Early Amniotomy Following Transcervical Foley Balloon in the Induction of Labor
NCT04573517
Early Amniotomy, Labor Induction
Galveston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT Number: NCT04075630
Our hypothesis is that there is one sequence of labour-induction that leads to a better experience of childbirth than others. This is based on the following underlying theories :
* Maternal satisfaction depends on the number of labour-inducing sequences * A longer labour-induction would be experienced less positively than a shorter one * The experience is correlated with maternal outcomes ( vaginal / Caesarian delivery, spontaneous birth or instrument-assisted birth, maternal complications ) and neonatal outcomes (neonatal complications, secondary hospitalization).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Observational
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Nîmes, Gard, France
Artificial labour induction is a medical intervention used in the interest of the mother or unborn child, aimed at provoking birth by inducing uterine contractions artificially, leading to cervical effacement and dilation. The purpose is to end the pregnancy in the interest of the mother and/or foetus.
According to the latest results of the Perinatal Enquiry (2016), induced labour rates total around 22% of pregnancies (767.000 births in 2017) in all maternity clinics. For the university hospitals of Nimes and Montpellier, with Level 3 maternity units (thus requiring a higher rate of inductions), this represents 515 and 550 pregnancies respectively (2017 figures).
There are several methods of inducing labour: use of a cervical ripening balloon (a medical device with which the onset of labour is provoked mechanically), vaginal inserts containing prostaglandins or intravenous perfusion with oxytocin combined with water-breakage. These labour-induction methods may be used alone or in succession depending on the evaluation of the cervix using the Bishop score as a reference. Each method has its own benefits and risks.
There is variability between establishments in the protocols used for cervical ripening.
The Nimes and Montpellier centres both use the same methods, but with different sequences.
Studies are mainly devoted to evaluating each method individually in terms childbirth by vaginal delivery and duration of labour.
Maternal satisfaction, which is a rarely studied multifactorial evaluation, is correlated with women's psychological outcome. A bad experience during childbirth appears to increase the risk of post-partum (PP) psychological disorders.
Considering the current literature available, although there have been trials comparing two isolated labour-induction methods, like the study by Probaat (Jozwiak et al., 2013), which compared obstetrical and neonatal outcomes with the cervical ripening balloon and the prostaglandin insert, none of these studies investigated their impact on maternal satisfaction. Although there have been a few studies evaluating maternal satisfaction at childbirth, there have not been any evaluating satisfaction during artificial labour-induction in a pragmatic situation.
The aim of our study was therefore to evaluate the impact on semi-immediate maternal satisfaction under pragmatic, real-life conditions depending on the various possible induction scenarios (both in terms of the number of methods used, from 1 to 3, and the possible combinations when at least 2 or more methods were used ).
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
The patient has made no formal opposition to taking part in the study.
Concerning the targeted population:
Exclusion criteria
The person is in a period of exclusion determined by a previous study.
Non-inclusion criteria concern associated illnesses or interfering conditions:
Time frame: 2 hours after giving birth
Overall patient satisfaction evaluated via a 4-point Likert scale (1= not satisfied, 2 = moderately satisfied, 3 = satisfied, 4 = very satisfied) on a touchscreen.
Time frame: 2 hours after giving birth
The Wijma Delivery Experience Questionnaire (W-DEQ) is a Scandinavian questionnaire (designed by Wijma et al. in 1998) translated into French. It evaluates the patient's true experience of childbirth compared with her expectations. It has 33 items based on recurring fears of pregnant women, divided into several catégories (fear, negative feelings, lack of confidence, behaviour etc…).
Time frame: 1-2 months after giving birth
The pluridimensional Questionnaire d'Evaluation du Vécu de l'Accouchement (QEVA) known in English as the QACE (Questionnaire for Assessing the Childbirth Experience is used to evaluate the patient's experience of childbirth. It contains 25 items, each with a 4-point Likert scale, divided into the following categories: relationship with healthcare teams, emotions (positive and negative), first moments with the newborn baby, situation one month after childbirth. An e-mail is sent to the patient 1 month after giving birth, asking her to complete the QEVA by logging onto a dedicated platform.
Time frame: 6 months after giving birth
Data collection from medical files on the methods of labour-induction used (alone or successively), duration of use and intermediate Bishop scores. This a pre-labor scoring system reflecting cervical modification ranges from 0 to 3 (0= cervix closed and 3 = dilated to more than 5 cm) assists in predicting whether labour-induction will be required and the likelihood of spontaneous preterm delivery.
Time frame: 48 hours maximum
Rate of spontaneous vaginal deliveries,
Time frame: 48 hours maximum
Rate of instrument-assisted vaginal deliveries.
Time frame: 48 hours maximum
Reason for instrument-assisted vaginal deliveries (non progression of fœtal presentation, fœtal distress, maternal complications).
Time frame: 48 hours maximum
Type of instrumental extraction used for the delivery
.
Time frame: 48 hours maximum
Rate of Caesarian births and reason (no cervical dilatation at the first stage of labour : dilatation 0 to 10cm, absence of fœtal descent at stage 2 of labour, fœtal cause, maternal cause).
Time frame: 48 hours maximum
Reason for Caesarian birth (no cervical dilatation at the first stage of labour : dilatation 0 to 10cm, absence of fœtal descent at stage 2 of labour, fœtal cause, maternal cause).
Time frame: 48 hours maximum
Time between the start of labour-induction and the onset of labour will be measured
Time frame: 48 hours maximum
Time from labour-induction to vaginal delivery
Time frame: 12 hours from start of induction
Rate of vaginal deliveries at 12 hours from start of labour-induction
Time frame: 24 hours from start of induction
Rate of vaginal deliveries at 24 hours from start of labour-induction
Time frame: 48 hours from start of induction
Rate of vaginal deliveries at 48 hours from start of labour-induction
Time frame: 12 - 18 hours
Rate of labour-induction failures giving rise to a Caesarian due to the duration of the latency phase (0-6cm) ≥24h with oxytocine administered for at least 12-18h after artificial water-breakage.
Time frame: up to 48 hours before birth
Rate of secondary or tertiary use of Propess (vaginal prostaglandine inserts)
Time frame: 48 hours maximum
Rate of secondary or tertiary use of the cervical ripening balloon (Foley bulb)
Time frame: 48 hours maximum
Rate of secondary or tertiary use of intravenous Oxytocine
Time frame: 48 hours maximum
Rate of epidural anesthaesia during labour
Time frame: Until birth (48 hours maximum)
The Bishop score,developed by Professor Emeritus of Obstetrics and Gynecology Dr. Edward Bishop, is also known as cervix score. It is a pre-labor scoring system to assist in predicting whether induction of labor will be required. It is based on 5 points : Cervical dilation in centimeters, cervical effacement as a percentage,cervical consistency by provider assessment/judgement, cervical position, fetal station (the position of the fetal head in relation to the pelvic bones).The Bishop score grades patients who would be most likely to achieve a successful induction. The duration of labor is inversely correlated with the Bishop score; a score that exceeds 8 describes the patient most likely to achieve a successful vaginal birth. Bishop scores of less than 6 usually require a cervical ripening method (pharmacologic or physical, such as a Foley bulb).
Time frame: Until birth (48 hours maximum)
The Bishop score,developed by Professor Emeritus of Obstetrics and Gynecology Dr. Edward Bishop, is also known as cervix score. It is a pre-labor scoring system to assist in predicting whether induction of labor will be required. It is based on 5 points : Cervical dilation in centimeters, cervical effacement as a percentage,cervical consistency by provider assessment/judgement, cervical position, fetal station (the position of the fetal head in relation to the pelvic bones).The Bishop score grades patients who would be most likely to achieve a successful induction. The duration of labor is inversely correlated with the Bishop score; a score that exceeds 8 describes the patient most likely to achieve a successful vaginal birth. Bishop scores of less than 6 usually require a cervical ripening method (pharmacologic or physical, such as a Foley bulb).
Time frame: Until birth (48 hours maximum)
The Bishop score,developed by Professor Emeritus of Obstetrics and Gynecology Dr. Edward Bishop, is also known as cervix score. It is a pre-labor scoring system to assist in predicting whether induction of labor will be required. It is based on 5 points : Cervical dilation in centimeters, cervical effacement as a percentage,cervical consistency by provider assessment/judgement, cervical position, fetal station (the position of the fetal head in relation to the pelvic bones).The Bishop score grades patients who would be most likely to achieve a successful induction. The duration of labor is inversely correlated with the Bishop score; a score that exceeds 8 describes the patient most likely to achieve a successful vaginal birth. Bishop scores of less than 6 usually require a cervical ripening method (pharmacologic or physical, such as a Foley bulb).
Time frame: 6 months after giving birth
Rate of uterine hyperstimulation(> 6 contractions in 10 minutes on 2 occasions) with or without an effect on the foetus
Time frame: 48 hours maximum
Rate of uterine hypertonia (contraction > 2 minutes with slowing down of fœtal heartbeat)
Time frame: 48 hours maximum
Rate of post partum haemorrage ≥ 500ml, rate of severe post-partum haemorrhage ≥1000ml, rate of transfusion, number of packs of red blood cells transfused
Time frame: 48 hours maximum
rate of severe post-partum haemorrage ≥1000ml rate of transfusion, number of packs of red blood cells transfused
Time frame: 48 hours maximum
Rate of transfusions
Time frame: 48 hours maximum
This is measured in terms of the number of packs of red blood cells transfused
Time frame: 48 hours maximum
Rate of uterine rupture
Time frame: 48 hours maximum
Chorioamniotitis (temperature > 38°C with fœtal tachycardia > 160 beats / minute)
Time frame: 1 week after giving birth
Rate of post-partum infection (temperature > 38°C with antibiotherapy, urinary infection, bacteriologically-proven endometritis at 1 week post-partum)
Time frame: 5 minutes after giving birth
Rate of neonatal asphyxia (umbilical cord arterial pH ≤ 7.05, and/or APGAR at 5 minutes < 7). The Apgar score is a means of evaluating the vitality of a newborn based on the simple observation at the time of birth. The value is a prognostic for neonatal mortality. It was developed in 1952 by the American doctor, Virginia Apgar.
Time frame: up to 48 hours after giving birth
Rate of neonatal pediatric hospitalisations
Time frame: up to 48 hours after giving birth
Bacteriologically-proven infection rate
Time frame: up to 48 hours after giving birth
Metrorrhagia due to vaginal insert (dinoprostone) or cervical ripening balloon placement
Time frame: up to 48 hours after giving birth
Pain related to balloon inflation requiring secondary partial deflation, reorded with a VAS. The visual analog scale is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured.The pain VAS is self-completed by the respondent. The respondent is asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represents their pain intensity
Time frame: up to 48 hours before birth
Pain level recorded with a VAS before the 1st induction sequence. The visual analog scale is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured.The pain VAS is self-completed by the respondent. The respondent is asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represents their pain intensity
Time frame: 2 hours after giving birth
Pain level recorded with a VAS at H2 of childbirth.
Time frame: labour time
Pain level at various times of labour-induction recorded with a VASThe visual analog scale is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured.The pain VAS is self-completed by the respondent. The respondent is asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represents their pain intensity
Time frame: up to 48 hours before birth
Pain level recorded with a VAS before vaginal insert or balloon placement. The visual analog scale is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured.The pain VAS is self-completed by the respondent. The respondent is asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represents their pain intensity
Time frame: 2 hours after device placement
Pain level recorded with a VAS 2 hours after vaginal insert or balloon placement. The visual analog scale is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured.The pain VAS is self-completed by the respondent. The respondent is asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represents their pain intensity
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Other
Observatory on Different Artificial Labour-induction Methods and Measuring Immediate Postpartum Maternal Satisfaction
Acronym: SATISFACC
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04573517
Early Amniotomy, Labor Induction
Galveston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06502418
Agnosia, Labor Induction
Roubaix, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05827731
Labor Induction, Mode of Delivery
Changsha, Hunan, China
View Trial DetailsNCT03039036
Labor Induction
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details