Observation and Study on the Application of Different Analgesic Regimens in Critically Ill Patients Without Mechanical Ventilation

Pain management is a critical component of treatment for critically ill patients, particularly in non-mechanically ventilated patient populations. Appropriate analgesic therapy not only impacts patient comfort but also directly influences disease outcomes and medical safety. Non-ventilated patients often endure moderate-to-severe pain due to conditions such as postoperative trauma, advanced cancer, and acute pancreatitis. Pain-induced stress responses can lead to tachycardia, hypertension, increased oxygen consumption, and immunosuppression. Studies indicate that inadequately controlled acute pain increases myocardial infarction risk by 2.3-fold and deep vein thrombosis incidence by 1.8-fold, with strong correlations to chronic pain persistence.

However, implementing analgesic therapy faces dual challenges:

• Pain assessment tends to be delayed in patients with impaired consciousness or communication difficulties, resulting in undertreatment;
• Analgesic drugs carry complex side-effect profiles, with opioid-associated respiratory depression occurring in 9%-12% of cases, and NSAIDs increasing gastrointestinal bleeding risk by 4.7-fold. These complications may have catastrophic consequences in non-ventilated patients. Taking respiratory depression as an example: non-ventilated patients lack artificial airway protection. Even mild reductions in respiratory rate can cause hypercapnia, potentially necessitating emergency intubation. Mortality rates among these emergently intubated patients are 3.2 times higher than those with planned intubation[3]. This therapeutic dilemma makes precise analgesic regimen selection a core clinical challenge.Notably, the novel analgesic hydromorphone-a semi-synthetic morphine derivative-exhibits 8-10 times greater analgesic potency than morphine with a non-ceiling effect. It offers rapid onset, non-toxic metabolites, and diverse administration routes, demonstrating superior clinical applicability especially in patients with hepatic/renal impairment. Preliminary studies suggest hydromorphone significantly reduces respiratory depression and gastrointestinal adverse events compared to traditional opioids. Nevertheless, clinical data in non-ventilated patients remain limited, warranting systematic evaluation.

Inclusion criteria

• Age ≥18 and ≤75 years; Non-mechanically ventilated patients (including post-extubation patients) with an anticipated ICU stay >24 hours; Patients with moderate to severe pain requiring analgesic therapy; Informed consent obtained from the patient or legal guardian.

Exclusion criteria

• Age <18 or >75 years; Pregnancy or lactation; Patients scheduled for general anesthesia surgery within 48 hours; Severe pre-existing parenchymal liver disease with clinically significant portal hypertension, Child-Pugh Class C cirrhosis, or acute liver failure; Bronchial asthma, COPD, or myasthenia gravis patients; Severe traumatic brain injury, brain tumors, intracranial hypertension, or other conditions predisposing to respiratory depression; History of alcohol or drug abuse; Any condition impairing cognitive assessment (e.g., language/sensory impairment or psychiatric disorders, such as aphasia or organic mental dysfunction); Inability to obtain informed consent or authorization; Participation in other investigational clinical trials within 6 months prior to screening; Known allergy to the study medication.