Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04318275

Objective Pain Measurement Using a Wearable Biosensor and a Mobile Platform in Patients With Endometriosis

This study aims to explore a novel objective measurement for endometriosis-related pain. A variety of pain symptoms are associated with endometriosis, including dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, dysuria, dyschezia and chronic pelvic pain. However, a clear characterization of pain typology and topology in populations with endometriosis, other gynecologic pathology, or a normal pelvis is lacking. Understanding the precise nature of the relationship between pain and endometriosis is important for the clinical management of affected women, given the body of evidence indicating that medical and surgical management for pain associated with endometriosis has been shown to be effective. Evaluating the relationship between pain and endometriosis, however, is challenging given that pain is difficult to measure and the mechanism by which endometriosis causes pain is not well understood. While previous studies have provided important data on the incidence of pelvic pain and endometriosis, little research has been done to assess both the typology and topology of pelvic pain, pain beyond the pelvis, endometriosis diagnosis, or severity of pain using operative findings and a standardized classification system.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

21 year–50 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Observational

Primary location

KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore

Loading trial locations.

About this study

BACKGROUND ON ENDOMETRIOSIS

A variety of pain symptoms are associated with endometriosis, including dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, dysuria, dyschezia and chronic pelvic pain. However, a clear characterization of pain typology and topology in populations with endometriosis, other gynecologic pathology, or a normal pelvis is lacking. Understanding the precise nature of the relationship between pain and endometriosis is important for the clinical management of affected women, given the body of evidence indicating that medical and surgical management for pain associated with endometriosis has been shown to be effective. Evaluating the relationship between pain and endometriosis, however, is challenging given that pain is difficult to measure and the mechanism by which endometriosis causes pain is not well understood. While previous studies have provided important data on the incidence of pelvic pain and endometriosis, little research has been done to assess both the typology and topology of pelvic pain, and pain beyond the pelvis, and endometriosis diagnosis and severity using operative findings and a standardized classification system.

Historically, pain has been measured using subjective scales to determine the presence of pain and its severity. Common scales include the numeric rating scale (NRS), visual analog scale (VAS), and visual response scale (VRS). While this is important information, self-reporting is a problematic metric for both diagnostic and research purposes as it depends on pain history, cognitive and behavioral factors, and can vary over time. Other measures used in clinical practice, such as the Biberoglu and Behrman (B&B) score, incorporate both patient and clinician assessments of pain. However, patients describe symptomatology and gynecologists evaluate tenderness and induration during physical examination with an exceedingly high risk of bias and inconsistent reproducibility. Over the past few years, significant advances have been made in the development of valid biomarkers or surrogate markers for the presence and severity of pain. Measurement of various physiology parameters like heart rate, heart rate variability and electrodermal activity have shown to be associated with the presence of pain and can aid clinical interpretation.

STUDY RATIONALE

Several ratings, such as the numeric rating scale (NRS) are mainly used in clinical trials to determine the presence and severity of pain associated with endometriosis. Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) such as NRS can be problematic as they are subjective, containing recall bias, and can vary over time. Thus, a more accurate and objective measurement of pain is needed to evaluate the efficacy of treatment with pain associated with endometriosis.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Able to give a written Informed Consent Form.
  • Patient who is willing to comply with study restrictions including E4® device management (wearing and charging the device) and Femme Rhythm Patient App Management (pairing E4® device and the patient Femme Rhythm App, and carrying the smartphone for answering questionnaires and data reporting)
  • Female patients aged ≥ 21 and < 50 years.
  • Patient who meets either A or B or both in the following criteria: A. Confirmed diagnosis of endometriosis (laparoscopy/laparotomy) performed WITHIN 10 YEARS prior to the study participation.

B. Current clinical diagnosis (endometriotic cysts or deep infiltrating endometriosis detected by TVUS, TRUS or MRI) WITHIN 6 MONTHS prior to the study participation.

  • Patient who meets either A or B in the following criteria:

A. Patient is NOT treated with hormonal agents for endometriosis WITHIN 4 WEEKS prior to study participation, and have regular menses (i.e. 21-38 days) within 38 days prior to the study participation.

B. Patient started hormonal agents for endometriosis, including combined oral contraceptives MORE THAN 8 WEEKS prior to the study participation, or progestins, danazol, GnRH agonists, GnRH antagonists or Progesterone and Levonorgestrel Releasing IUDs MORE THAN 12 WEEKS prior to the study participation, AND stable use of the medication is expected during the study period

  • Patient has a moderate to severe endometriosis- associated pelvic pain using the Monthly Assessment of Endometriosis Pain within 28 days prior to study participation

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient is pregnant, or breast feeding or is planning a pregnancy during participation of the study or is less than 6 months postpartum, post-abortion, or post-pregnancy before participation.
  • Patient has chronic pelvic pain that is not caused by endometriosis that requires chronic analgesic or other chronic therapy, or that would interfere with the assessment of endometriosis related pain (e.g., pelvic inflammatory disease).
  • Patient has more than five surgical histories in pelvic area.
  • Patient has a skin disease or condition that would interfere with the collection or interpretation of physiological data obtained through E4®
  • Patient required neuromodulator (a long-acting or immediate release narcotic, or gabapentin) during 3 months prior to the study participation.
  • Patient has a planned surgery during the study.
  • Patient had a surgery within 4 weeks prior to the study participation.
  • Patient has a planned trip overseas during the study participation.
  • Any other reason that, in the judgment of the investigator, would render the subject unsuitable for the study participation.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. The concordance between Pain Index and NRS scores during the study period. (Categorised into none, mild, moderate and severe pain)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    Pain Index will be generated via vital sign collected from subjects and processed by Biofourmis's propriety algorithm. Both pain index and NRS will be categorised into None (0), Mild (1-3), Moderate (4-6), and Severe (7-10) pain.

    Concordance will be measured using unweighted Kappa Statistic for multiple categories with 95% CI. Percentage agreement between the categories will be also calculated by taking the number of concordant pairs divided by the total number of pain episodes.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The correlation between 11-point Pain Index (0-10) and 11-point NRS score (0-10).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    The generated Pain Index will be classified into 11 points (0-10) in accordance with the raw NRS score.

    Correlation between the 11-point Pain Index and raw NRS score will be measured using Spearman correlation.

Other outcomes

  1. Exploratory Endpoint 1: Correlation between Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L and EHP-30), Productivity (HRPQ), PROMIS-Fatigue with Sleep Quality and Stress Values calculated using Biofourmis's propriety algorithm.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    The Pearson correlation and its statistical significance between the various Quality of Life measures and the Sleep Quality and Stress Values (calculated using Biofourmis's propriety algorithm) will be presented in a matrix table.

  2. Exploratory Endpoint 2: Trend of Quality of Life over the study period

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    The trend of Quality of life measures will be presented using line charts.

  3. Exploratory Endpoint 3: Trend of Pain Index and NRS categories over the study period

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    The trend of Pain Index and NRS categories (None, Mild, Moderate, Severe) will be presented using bar graphs.

  4. Exploratory Endpoint 4: Effect of concomitant medication usage on the NRS categories

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    Effects of concomitant medication usage will be measured as an increment or decrement in NRS pain categories (None, Mild, Moderate, Severe), based on the highest pain reported by patient before taking the medication and the pain report after medication usage.

  5. Exploratory Endpoint 5: Effect of concomitant medication usage on the Pain Index categories

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    Effects of concomitant medication usage will be measured as an increment or decrement in Pain Index categories (None, Mild, Moderate, Severe), based on the highest pain reported by patient before taking the medication and the Pain Index generated based on the pain report after medication usage.

  6. Exploratory Endpoint 6: Correlation between EQ-5D-5L and physiological parameters.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    The correlation between EQ-5D-5L and physiological parameters will be presented as scatterplots with the Pearson correlation and statistical significance.

  7. Exploratory Endpoint 7: Correlation between EHP-30 and physiological parameters.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    The correlation between EHP-30 and physiological parameters will be presented as scatterplots with the Pearson correlation and statistical significance.

  8. Exploratory Endpoint 8: Correlation between Productivity (HRPQ) and physiological parameters.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    The correlation between Productivity (HRPQ) and physiological parameters will be presented as scatterplots with the Pearson correlation and statistical significance.

  9. Exploratory Endpoint 9: Correlation between PROMIS-Fatigue and physiological parameters.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    The correlation between PROMIS-Fatigue and physiological parameters will be presented as scatterplots with the Pearson correlation and statistical significance.

  10. Exploratory Endpoint 10: Change in Pain Index, NRS categories over the menstrual cycle.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    Changes in Pain Index, NRS categories (None, Mild, Moderate, Severe) over the menstrual cycle will be summarized by plotting bar graphs across menstrual cycle.

  11. Exploratory Endpoint 11: Change in physiological parameters over the menstrual cycle.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    Changes in physiological parameters over the menstrual cycle will be summarized using boxplots across menstrual cycle.

  12. Exploratory Endpoint 12: Change in Pain Index, NRS categories by the type of lesions

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    Changes in Pain Index, NRS categories (None, Mild, Moderate, Severe) over the lesion types will be summarized using bar graphs across the menstrual cycle.

  13. Exploratory Endpoint 13: Change in physiological parameters by the type of lesions

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    Changes in physiological parameters over the lesion types will be summarized using boxplots across the menstrual cycle.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Biofourmis Singapore Pte Ltd.

Industry

Collaborators

  • Chugai Pharmaceutical

Registry information

Official study title

An Early Feasibility Study to Explore a Novel Objective Pain Measurement Using a Wearable Biosensor and a Novel Mobile Platform in Patients With Endometriosis (OPINE)

Acronym: OPINE

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2022
First posted
Mar 23, 2020
Registry last updated
May 19, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.