Obeticholic Acid (OCA)
DrugOther names: 6alpha-ethylchenodeoxycholic acid (6-ECDCA), INT-747
NCT Number: NCT02177136
This was a phase 2, double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled trial in participants with primary sclerosing cholangitis to evaluate the effect of obeticholic acid on liver biochemistry, in particular, serum alkaline phosphatase; and, safety. The long-term safety extension (LTSE) phase was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of long-term, open-label use of OCA in participants with PSC who had completed the DB phase of the study.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Dipartimento di Universitario di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Bologna, Italy
This was a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding evaluation of the efficacy and safety of OCA in participants with PSC. Approximately 75 participants who provided written informed consent and met all of the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment groups as follows: 1.5 milligrams (mg) titrating to 3 mg OCA, 5 mg titrating to 10 mg OCA, or placebo, in a 1:1:1 ratio. Participants self-administered investigational product (IP) orally, once daily for 2 consecutive 12-week periods.
For the first 12 weeks, the participant's dose was 1.5 mg OCA, 5 mg OCA, or placebo. After 12 weeks, the participant's dose was titrated as follows, providing there were no limiting safety or tolerability concerns in the opinion of the Investigator, while maintaining the trial blind: the 1.5 mg OCA treatment group titrated to 3 mg, the 5 mg OCA treatment group titrated to 10 mg OCA, and the placebo group remained on placebo. Double-blind treatment continued for a further 12 weeks at that dose.
Any participant whose dose was not titrated, due to safety or tolerability concerns, remained on their starting treatment (1.5 mg OCA, 5 mg OCA, or placebo) for the remainder of the DB phase to Week 24.
Randomization was stratified by the presence or absence of concomitant ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) use and total bilirubin level (≤1.5x upper limit of normal [ULN] or >1.5x ULN but <2.5x ULN).
Following completion of the DB phase, participants were asked to reconfirm their consent for participation in the open-label LTSE phase (planned as a further 24 months).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Other names: 6alpha-ethylchenodeoxycholic acid (6-ECDCA), INT-747
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
The primary efficacy analysis compared the Week 24 change from Baseline in ALP between OCA treatment group and placebo using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with fixed effects for treatment group and randomization strata, and Baseline as a covariate. Results are reported in U/L.
Time frame: LTSE Baseline (DB Week 24) to Month 26
The primary safety analysis evaluated the effects of OCA treatment on AESIs of pruritus, hepatic disorders, and dyslipidemia. All adverse event (AE) summaries were restricted to treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs), which were defined as any AEs that newly appeared, increased in frequency, or worsened in severity following initiation of investigational product. Treatment-emergent pruritus was defined as any preferred term (PT) including "Prur-". Hepatic disorder AESIs were defined using specific Hepatic Disorders Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Query (SMQ) terms. AE lipid profile changes, defined in the Dyslipidemia SMQ, were reported. Verbatim terms were mapped to PTs and system organ classes (SOCs) using MedDRA version 17.1 for all AE summaries except those for hepatic disorder AESIs, which used MedDRA version 18.1. A summary of serious and all other non-serious AEs, regardless of causality, is located in the Reported Adverse Events module.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
As a marker of hepatic biochemistry and liver function, the median change in ALT from Baseline at Week 24 is reported. Results are reported in U/L.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
As a marker of hepatic biochemistry and liver function, the median change in AST from Baseline at Week 24 is reported. Results are reported in U/L.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
As a marker of hepatic biochemistry and liver function, the median change in serum total bilirubin from Baseline at Week 24 is reported. Results are reported in umol/L.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
As a marker of hepatic biochemistry and liver function, the median change in serum direct bilirubin from Baseline at Week 24 is reported. Results are reported in umol/L.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
As a marker of hepatic biochemistry and liver function, the median change in serum GGT from Baseline at Week 24 is reported. Results are reported in U/L.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
To assess farnesoid X receptor (FXR) activity, the change in FGF-19 from Baseline at Week 24 is reported. Results are reported in picograms/milliliter (pg/mL).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
To assess FXR activity, the change in plasma C4 from Baseline at Week 24 is reported. Results are reported in nanograms (ng)/mL.
Time frame: LTSE Baseline (DB Week 24), Month 12
The median change in serum ALP from Baseline to the last available visit is reported. The DB value at Week 24 was used as the Baseline. Results are reported in U/L.
Time frame: LTSE Baseline (DB Week 24), Month 12
As a marker of hepatic biochemistry and liver function, the median change in ALT from Baseline at Month 12 is reported. The DB value at Week 24 was used as the Baseline. Results are reported in U/L.
Time frame: LTSE Baseline (DB Week 24), Month 12
As a marker of hepatic biochemistry and liver function, the median change in AST from Baseline at Month 12 is reported. The DB value at Week 24 was used as the Baseline. Results are reported in U/L.
Time frame: LTSE Baseline (DB Week 24), Month 12
As a marker of hepatic biochemistry and liver function, the median change in serum total bilirubin from Baseline at Month 12 is reported. The DB value at Week 24 was used as the Baseline. Results are reported in umol/L.
Time frame: LTSE Baseline (DB Week 24), Month 12
As a marker of hepatic biochemistry and liver function, the median change in serum direct bilirubin from Baseline at Month 12 is reported. The DB value at Week 24 was used as the Baseline. Results are reported in umol/L.
Time frame: LTSE Baseline (DB Week 24), Month 12
As a marker of hepatic biochemistry and liver function, the median change in serum GGT from Baseline at Month 12 is reported. The DB value at Week 24 was used as the Baseline. Results are reported in U/L.
Time frame: LTSE Baseline (DB Week 24), Month 12
As a marker of hepatic biochemistry and liver function, the median change in albumin from Baseline at Month 12 is reported. The DB value at Week 24 was used as the Baseline. Results are reported in grams (g)/L.
Time frame: LTSE Baseline (DB Week 24), Month 12
As a marker of hepatic biochemistry and liver function, the median change in INR from Baseline at Month 12 is reported. The DB value at Week 24 was used as the Baseline.
Time frame: LTSE Baseline (DB Week 24), Month 12
As a marker of hepatic inflammation and fibrosis, the median change in TE, as a measure of hepatic stiffness, from Baseline at Month 12 is reported. The DB value at Week 24 was used as the Baseline. Results are reported in kilopascal (kPa).
Time frame: LTSE Baseline (DB Week 24), Month 12
As a marker of hepatic inflammation and fibrosis, the change in ELF score from Baseline at Month 12 is reported. The ELF score and its components (hyaluronic acid [HA]; procollagen-3 N-terminal peptide [P3NP]; tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 [TIMP-1]) was calculated as follows: 2.278 + 0.851 x ln(HA (ng/mL)) + 0.751 x ln(P3NP (ng/mL)) + 0.394 x ln(TIMP-1 (ng/mL). The DB value at Week 24 was used as the Baseline. An increase in score indicates an improvement/worsening of symptoms.
Time frame: LTSE Baseline (DB Week 24), Month 12
To assess FXR activity, the change in FGF-19 from Baseline at Month 12 is reported. The DB value at Week 24 was used as the Baseline. Results are reported in pg/mL.
Time frame: LTSE Baseline (DB Week 24), Month 12
To assess FXR activity, the change in plasma C4 from Baseline at Month 12 is reported. The DB value at Week 24 was used as the Baseline. Results are reported in ng/mL.
Time frame: Month 12
To assess inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) activity, the number of participants experiencing ulcerative colitis remission at Month 12 is reported. Remission was defined as a partial Mayo score of ≤2 with no individual sub-score exceeding 1 point.
Time frame: Month 12
To assess IBD activity, the number of participants experiencing Crohn's Disease remission at Month 12 is reported. Remission was defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index score of <150.
Time frame: Month 12
To assess the effects on bile acids, the median change in total bile acids from Baseline at Month 12 is reported. The DB value at Week 24 was used as the Baseline. Results are reported in umol/L.
Time frame: LTSE Baseline (DB Week 24), Month 12
To assess the effects on disease-specific symptoms, the median change in the pruritus VAS score from Baseline at Month 12 is reported. The score is derived from the VAS participant questionnaire, which has the participant draw a line anywhere on a scale that best represents the severity of the itch; the scale ranges from 0 (no itching) to 10 (worst possible itching), in increments of 2. An increase in score represents an increase in severity of symptoms. The DB value at Week 24 was used as the Baseline.
Intercept Pharmaceuticals
Industry
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Finding, Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Obeticholic Acid in Subjects With Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
Acronym: AESOP
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03333928
Bile Duct Diseases, Biliary Tract Diseases
Chandler, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01161992
Bile Duct Diseases, Biliary Tract Diseases
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06686810
Adenocarcinoma, Bile Duct Diseases
Roma, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT06037577
Bile Duct Diseases, Biliary Tract Diseases
Tel Aviv, Israel
View Trial Details