Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science
Los Angeles, California, 90059, United States
NCT Number: NCT04725058
The purpose of this study has two aims: Aim 1: To compare a medical group visit model versus a dietitian-let model (shared composite group visit approach vs individualized dietitian-led approach) to provide obesity care in a real-world diverse inner city population.
Aim 2. To use both perivascular fat attenuation and coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores in those receiving composite group intervention vs. dietitian-led intervention to see if lifestyle intervention can reduce plaque progression and improve perivascular fat attenuation.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year–90 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Los Angeles, California, 90059, United States
After being informed about the study and potential risks, all study participants giving written informed consent will be screened to determine eligibility for study entry. At week 0, study participants who meet the eligibility requirements will be randomized in a blind manner (participant only) in a 3:1 block ratio. The study will randomize 750 subjects to the composite group visit and 250 subjects to the dietitian-led group into a 12-months duration study.
For Aim 2: A subset of 200 participants who identify as female and over 50 years old and males over 40 years old randomized to either the composite group arm or the dietitian-led arm will have the option to take part in a sub-study that involves getting a Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) scan done at the Lundquist Institute. The first 125 subjects in the composite group arm and the first 75 subjects in the dietitian-led arm that express interest and want to undergo CAC scanning and perivascular fat measurements at baseline and at 12-months of intervention will need to sign a separate consent for these procedures. CAC scan readers will be blind to the assigned group. A group of 100 subjects not participating in the aim 1 intervention will be able to join the study under the control group. These participants will not be randomly assigned.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Females >50 years of age and Males >40 years of age meet inclusion criteria to participate in the sub-study that involves getting a Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) scan done at the Lundquist Institute.
Exclusion criteria
Females <50 years of age and Males <40 years of age are not eligible to participate in the sub-study that involves getting a Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) scan done at the Lundquist Institute.
A group of 20 or more participants will receive obesity management through endocrinologist and registered dietitian in a group seetting.
Other names: Medical Group
Participant receives obesity management individually from a registered dietitian.
Time frame: Baseline, months 3, 6 and 12.
Weight will be measured at baseline and at 3,6, and 12 months.
Time frame: Baseline, months 3, 6 and 12.
Hemoglobin A1c will be measured at baseline, and at moths 0, 3, 6 and 12 to determine the effect of the intervention arm.
Time frame: Baseline, months 3, 6 and 12.
Diet quality will be assessed by the healthy eating Index-2015 score calculated from the food frequency questionnaire using the diet history questionnaire tool (DHQ) version III software. The minimum and maximum scores ranges fron 0 to 100. Higher scores greater than 60 indicate better diet quality.
Time frame: Baseline, months 3, 6 and 12.
The IPAQ short form is a seven-item instrument evaluation tool of physical activity among the adults that measures a range of physical activity from vigorous to sedentary over the last 7 days. The specific type of activities assessed are walking, moderate intensity activities and vigorous intensity activities. All continuous scores are expressed in metabolic equivalent minutes(MET-minutes) per week with walking =3.3 METs, Moderate PA=4.0 METs and Vigorous PA = 8.0 METs. An overall total physical activity score can be computed as the sum of the total MET-minutes/week scores where more MET-minutes per week indicate more physical activity
Time frame: Baseline, months 3, 6 and 12.
The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) consists of 12-item rating scale for assessing psychological distress over the past few weeks. Scale score ranges from 0-12, with a higher score indicating a higher level of psychological distress.
Time frame: Baseline and at month-12.
Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up PRAPARE score. The PRAPARE assessment tool will be used to calculate a tally risk score indicating the cumulative number of SDOH risks a patient faces (including 15 SDOH domains).
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months.
Coronary Artery Scanning will be measured at baseline and at month 12 to determine calcium scores. The minimum and maximum scores ranges from 0 to 400. Higher scores means worse outcome. We categorized the total CAC scores into 0-100 no/mild risk; scores 101-400 moderate risk; and > 400 severe risk.
Charles Drew University of Medicine and Science
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04335799
Body Weight, Nutrition Disorders
Tampa, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05198765
Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00739362
Body Weight, Body Weight Changes
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07400653
Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus
Anaheim, California, United States
View Trial Details