Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07087821

NYU Epilepsy Self-Management Study

The investigators will conduct two-arm randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing effects of UPLIFT vs. enhanced usual care and PACES vs. enhanced usual care, respectively, on quality of life, depressive symptoms and seizures over 12 months in NYU patients with epilepsy.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

NYU Langone Health - NYU Langone Hospital-Brooklyn, Brooklyn, New York, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

UPLIFT and PACES are two evidence-based epilepsy self-management programs whose adoption and impact are limited by the lack of sustainable funding models.

The investigators will conduct an economic evaluation of these programs using data from completed and new trials in both healthcare and community settings.

The investigators will conduct two parallel RCTs to compare effects of UPLIFT vs. enhanced usual care, and separately, PACES vs. enhanced usual care.

Outcome data including patient-reported outcomes and costs will be aligned across the two trials and community implementation and collected at baseline and 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits for use in the economic evaluations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults (≥18 years)
  • English-speaking (UPLIFT and PACES) or Spanish-speaking (UPLIFT only).
  • Diagnosed with epilepsy for at least one year
  • Able to understand the informed consent and provide consent
  • Elevated depressive symptoms - Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score ≥10; applies to UPLIFT only

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe depressive symptoms (score of ≥20 on PHQ-9)
  • Active suicidal ideation (score of ≥1 on PHQ-9 item #9 or otherwise reported during screening)
  • Active psychotic disorder (psychiatric diagnosis and/or antipsychotic medications in the electronic health records (EHR)
  • Significant cognitive impairment (indicated in the EHR or evident during screening)

Treatment and study plan

UPLIFT

Behavioral

UPLIFT is an 8-week epilepsy self-management programs delivered to small groups of people with epilepsy (PWE) by Webex. UPLIFT is focused on self-management of depressive symptoms.

Each weekly session is 1 hour long and is comprised of a check-in period, teaching on the week's topic, group discussion, a skill-building exercise and a home practice assignment.

PACES

Behavioral

PACES is an 8-week epilepsy self-management programs delivered to small groups of people with epilepsy (PWE) by Webex. PACES focuses on general epilepsy self-management.

Each weekly session is 1 hour long and is comprised of a check-in period, teaching on the week's topic, group discussion, a skill-building exercise and a home practice assignment.

Enhanced Usual Care

Behavioral

Participants receive referrals to local epilepsy support groups.

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants with Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score <5

    Time frame: Baseline

    RCT 1 participants only.

    The PHQ-9 is a 9-item assessment of depression; each item is rated on a scale from 0-3. The total score is the sum of item responses and ranges from 0-27; higher scores indicate greater levels of depression. The primary outcome is the count of participants who score less than 5 on the PHQ-9 (i.e., absence of clinically significant depressive symptoms).

  2. Number of Participants with PHQ-9 Score <5

    Time frame: Post-Intervention Month 3 Follow-up (Approximately Month 5)

    RCT 1 participants only.

    The PHQ-9 is a 9-item assessment of depression; each item is rated on a scale from 0-3. The total score is the sum of item responses and ranges from 0-27; higher scores indicate greater levels of depression. The primary outcome is the count of participants who score less than 5 on the PHQ-9 (i.e., absence of clinically significant depressive symptoms).

  3. Number of Participants with PHQ-9 Score <5

    Time frame: Post-Intervention Month 6 Follow-up (Approximately Month 8)

    RCT 1 participants only.

    The PHQ-9 is a 9-item assessment of depression; each item is rated on a scale from 0-3. The total score is the sum of item responses and ranges from 0-27; higher scores indicate greater levels of depression. The primary outcome is the count of participants who score less than 5 on the PHQ-9 (i.e., absence of clinically significant depressive symptoms).

  4. Number of Participants with PHQ-9 Score <5

    Time frame: Post-Intervention Month 12 Follow-up (Approximately Month 14)

    RCT 1 participants only.

    The PHQ-9 is a 9-item assessment of depression; each item is rated on a scale from 0-3. The total score is the sum of item responses and ranges from 0-27; higher scores indicate greater levels of depression. The primary outcome is the count of participants who score less than 5 on the PHQ-9 (i.e., absence of clinically significant depressive symptoms).

  5. Composite PHQ-9 and Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-31 (QOLIE-31) Score

    Time frame: Baseline

    RCT 2 participants only.

    The QOLIE-31 is a 31-item questionnaire evaluating an epilepsy patient's quality of life (QOL) perception. The overall score is derived by weighing and then summing the 7 domain scores, which correspond with the item responses. The overall score is converted to a final, 0-100 point score, where higher converted scores reflect better QOL.

    The PHQ-9 is a 9-item assessment of depression; each item is rated on a scale from 0-3. The total score is the sum of item responses and ranges from 0-27; higher scores indicate greater levels of depression.

    The scores from both the PHQ-9 and QOLIE-3 are re-scaled into a combined, Composite PHQ+QOLIE Score ranging from 0-100; higher values indicate more favorable outcomes.

  6. Composite PHQ-9 and Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-31 (QOLIE-31) Score

    Time frame: Post-Intervention Month 3 Follow-up (Approximately Month 5)

    RCT 2 participants only.

    The QOLIE-31 is a 31-item questionnaire evaluating an epilepsy patient's quality of life (QOL) perception. The overall score is derived by weighing and then summing the 7 domain scores, which correspond with the item responses. The overall score is converted to a final, 0-100 point score, where higher converted scores reflect better QOL.

    The PHQ-9 is a 9-item assessment of depression; each item is rated on a scale from 0-3. The total score is the sum of item responses and ranges from 0-27; higher scores indicate greater levels of depression.

    The scores from both the PHQ-9 and QOLIE-3 are re-scaled into a combined, Composite PHQ+QOLIE Score ranging from 0-100; higher values indicate more favorable outcomes.

  7. Composite PHQ-9 and QOLIE-31 Score

    Time frame: Post-Intervention Month 6 Follow-up (Approximately Month 8)

    RCT 2 participants only.

    The QOLIE-31 is a 31-item questionnaire evaluating an epilepsy patient's quality of life (QOL) perception. The overall score is derived by weighing and then summing the 7 domain scores, which correspond with the item responses. The overall score is converted to a final, 0-100 point score, where higher converted scores reflect better QOL.

    The PHQ-9 is a 9-item assessment of depression; each item is rated on a scale from 0-3. The total score is the sum of item responses and ranges from 0-27; higher scores indicate greater levels of depression.

    The scores from both the PHQ-9 and QOLIE-3 are re-scaled into a combined, Composite PHQ+QOLIE Score ranging from 0-100; higher values indicate more favorable outcomes.

  8. Composite PHQ-9 and QOLIE-31 Score

    Time frame: Post-Intervention Month 12 Follow-up (Approximately Month 14)

    RCT 2 participants only.

    The QOLIE-31 is a 31-item questionnaire evaluating an epilepsy patient's quality of life (QOL) perception. The overall score is derived by weighing and then summing the 7 domain scores, which correspond with the item responses. The overall score is converted to a final, 0-100 point score, where higher converted scores reflect better QOL.

    The PHQ-9 is a 9-item assessment of depression; each item is rated on a scale from 0-3. The total score is the sum of item responses and ranges from 0-27; higher scores indicate greater levels of depression.

    The scores from both the PHQ-9 and QOLIE-3 are re-scaled into a combined, Composite PHQ+QOLIE Score ranging from 0-100; higher values indicate more favorable outcomes.

  9. 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) Score

    Time frame: Baseline

    The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL). It consists of two parts: a descriptive system and a visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system assesses health across five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, each with five levels of severity. The EQ VAS provides a self-assessment of overall health on a scale of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better health. The EQ-5D-5L will be used to derive utility values to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for cost-utility analyses.

  10. EQ-5D-5L Score

    Time frame: Post-Intervention Month 3 Follow-up (Approximately Month 5)

    The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL). It consists of two parts: a descriptive system and a visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system assesses health across five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, each with five levels of severity. The EQ VAS provides a self-assessment of overall health on a scale of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better health. The EQ-5D-5L will be used to derive utility values to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for cost-utility analyses.

  11. EQ-5D-5L Score

    Time frame: Post-Intervention Month 6 Follow-up (Approximately Month 8)

    The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL). It consists of two parts: a descriptive system and a visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system assesses health across five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, each with five levels of severity. The EQ VAS provides a self-assessment of overall health on a scale of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better health. The EQ-5D-5L will be used to derive utility values to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for cost-utility analyses.

  12. EQ-5D-5L Score

    Time frame: Post-Intervention Month 12 Follow-up (Approximately Month 14)

    The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL). It consists of two parts: a descriptive system and a visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system assesses health across five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, each with five levels of severity. The EQ VAS provides a self-assessment of overall health on a scale of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better health. The EQ-5D-5L will be used to derive utility values to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for cost-utility analyses.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in PHQ-9 Score

    Time frame: Baseline, Post-Intervention Month 3 Follow-up (Approximately Month 5)

    The PHQ-9 is a 9-item assessment of depression; each item is rated on a scale from 0-3. The total score is the sum of item responses and ranges from 0-27; higher scores indicate greater levels of depression.

  2. Change from Baseline in PHQ-9 Score

    Time frame: Baseline, Post-Intervention Month 6 Follow-up (Approximately Month 8)

    The PHQ-9 is a 9-item assessment of depression; each item is rated on a scale from 0-3. The total score is the sum of item responses and ranges from 0-27; higher scores indicate greater levels of depression.

  3. Change from Baseline in PHQ-9 Score

    Time frame: Baseline, Post-Intervention Month 12 Follow-up (Approximately Month 14)

    The PHQ-9 is a 9-item assessment of depression; each item is rated on a scale from 0-3. The total score is the sum of item responses and ranges from 0-27; higher scores indicate greater levels of depression.

  4. Change from Baseline in QOLIE-31

    Time frame: Baseline, Post-Intervention Month 3 Follow-up (Approximately Month 5)

    The QOLIE-31 is a 31-item questionnaire evaluating an epilepsy patient's quality of life (QOL) perception. The overall score is derived by weighing and then summing the 7 domain scores, which correspond with the item responses. The overall score is converted to a final, 0-100 point score, where higher converted scores reflect better QOL.

  5. Change from Baseline in QOLIE-31

    Time frame: Baseline, Post-Intervention Month 6 Follow-up (Approximately Month 8)

    The QOLIE-31 is a 31-item questionnaire evaluating an epilepsy patient's quality of life (QOL) perception. The overall score is derived by weighing and then summing the 7 domain scores, which correspond with the item responses. The overall score is converted to a final, 0-100 point score, where higher converted scores reflect better QOL.

  6. Change from Baseline in QOLIE-31

    Time frame: Baseline, Post-Intervention Month 12 Follow-up (Approximately Month 14)

    The QOLIE-31 is a 31-item questionnaire evaluating an epilepsy patient's quality of life (QOL) perception. The overall score is derived by weighing and then summing the 7 domain scores, which correspond with the item responses. The overall score is converted to a final, 0-100 point score, where higher converted scores reflect better QOL.

  7. Change from Baseline in Seizure Frequency

    Time frame: Baseline, Post-Intervention Month 3 Follow-up (Approximately Month 5)

  8. Change from Baseline in Seizure Frequency

    Time frame: Baseline, Post-Intervention Month 6 Follow-up (Approximately Month 8)

  9. Change from Baseline in Seizure Frequency

    Time frame: Baseline, Post-Intervention Month 12 Follow-up (Approximately Month 14)

  10. Healthcare Utilization

    Time frame: Baseline

    A composite count of outpatient visits, hospitalizations, and emergency department visits will be collected using a combination of EHR review and patient self-report.

  11. Healthcare Utilization

    Time frame: Post-Intervention Month 3 Follow-up (Approximately Month 5)

    A composite count of outpatient visits, hospitalizations, and emergency department visits will be collected using a combination of EHR review and patient self-report.

  12. Healthcare Utilization

    Time frame: Post-Intervention Month 6 Follow-up (Approximately Month 8)

    A composite count of outpatient visits, hospitalizations, and emergency department visits will be collected using a combination of EHR review and patient self-report.

  13. Healthcare Utilization

    Time frame: Post-Intervention Month 12 Follow-up (Approximately Month 14)

    A composite count of outpatient visits, hospitalizations, and emergency department visits will be collected using a combination of EHR review and patient self-report.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Tanya Spruill, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

646-501-3429

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

NYU Langone Health

Other

Collaborators

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Registry information

Official study title

Economic Evaluation of Managing Epilepsy Well (MEW) Network Epilepsy Self-Management Programs

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jul 28, 2025
Registry last updated
May 29, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.