Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19146, United States
NCT Number: NCT03632876
This study establishes the safety and efficacy of vit A supplementation doses (3000 and 6000 IU/d) over 8 weeks in children with SCD-SS, ages 9 and older and test the impact of vit A supplementation on key functional and clinical outcomes. Additionally, vitamin A status is assessed in healthy children ages 9 and older to compare to subjects with SCD-SS.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me9 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19146, United States
Suboptimal vitamin A (vit A) status is prevalent in children with type SS sickle cell disease (SCD-SS) and associated with hospitalizations and poor growth and hematological status. Preliminary data in children with SCD-SS show that vit A supplementation at the dose recommended for healthy children failed to improve vit A status, resulting in no change in hospitalizations, growth or dark adaptation. This indicates an increased vit A requirement most likely due to chronic inflammation, low vit A intake and possible stool or urine loss. The dose of vit A needed to optimize vit A status in subjects with SCD-SS is unknown.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The intervention is a daily vitamin A supplement.
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Serum vitamin A as measured by retinol
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Retinyl palmitate
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Measured on a stadiometer, compared to Center for Disease Control (CDC) reference standard to create a z-score
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Measured on a standing scale, compared to CDC reference standard to create a z-score
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Calculated using kg/m^2 and compared to CDC reference standards
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Calculated from dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Calculated from DEXA scan
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Calculated from DEXA scan
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Calculated from mid-upper arm circumference
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Calculated from mid-upper arm circumference and triceps skinfold thickness
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Directly measured with Biodex Multi-Joint System 3 Pro
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Directly measured with Force Plate
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Directly measured with hand-grip strength dynamometer
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Directly measured with Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Analysis of a three-day food record
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Calculated from 72-hour stool collection and dietary fat intake
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Direct measurement through spectral absorption
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Direct measurement through spectral absorption
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Direct measurement through quantitative flow cytometry
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Direct measurement through quantitative flow cytometry
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Calculated from hemoglobin mass and erythrocyte count
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Calculated from hemoglobin divided by hematocrit
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Direct measurement through quantitative flow cytometry
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Direct measurement through quantitative nephelometry
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Direct measurement through quantitative nephelometry
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Direct measurement through quantitative spectrophotometry
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Direct measurement through quantitative spectrophotometry
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Direct measurement through quantitative enzymatic assay
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Direct measurement through quantitative enzymatic assay
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Direct measurement through quantitative enzymatic assay
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Direct measurement through quantitative enzymatic assay
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Direct measurement through quantitative quantitative spectrophotometry
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Direct measurement through quantitative quantitative immunoturbidimetry
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Direct measurement through quantitative quantitative multiplex bead assay
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Direct measurement through automated cell count
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Direct measurement through automated cell count
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
Direct measurement through quantitative flow cytometry
Time frame: Change from baseline after supplementation for 8 weeks
compartmental modeling of [13C10]-retinyl acetate, measured by high performance liquid chromatography/mass spectroscopy
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Other
Vitamin A in Sickle Cell Disease: Improving Sub-optimal Status With Supplementation
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06939933
Anemia, Anemia, Hemolytic
Tanta, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT04750707
Sickle Cell Anemia in Children
Kampala, Uganda
View Trial DetailsNCT04579926
Anemia, Anemia, Hemolytic
Golden, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04800809
Anemia, Anemia, Hemolytic
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial Details