Team Huddles
BehavioralBrief multidisciplinary meeting occurring twice a week for staff working at a LTC home led by a Nurse Practitioner. Huddles focused on discussing resident-care and staff-wellbeing.
NCT Number: NCT05387213
A pre-experimental design to conduct a process evaluation and to compare the outcomes after implementing team huddles for the intervention and control groups.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Long-Term Care Home, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Staff working in long-term care (LTC) homes during COVID-19 frequently reported lack of communication, collaboration, and teamwork, all of which are associated with staff dissatisfaction, health concerns, perceived of lack of support and moral distress. The purpose of this study was to introduced regular huddles, led by a Nurse Practitioner, to support LTC staff during COVID-19. The objectives were to evaluate the process of huddle implementation and to examine differences between staff attending and not attending the huddles on outcomes of moral distress, job satisfaction, perceived support from the Nurse Practitioner, and health and mental health. Furthermore, we hypothesize that regular huddles can lead to improvements in resident-centred care and resident outcomes.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Brief multidisciplinary meeting occurring twice a week for staff working at a LTC home led by a Nurse Practitioner. Huddles focused on discussing resident-care and staff-wellbeing.
Time frame: 20 weeks
Moral Distress in Dementia Care is a ten-item checklist, where respondents are asked to rate moral distress associated with each item on a 5-point scale ranging from none (1) to an extremely large amount (5). Higher scores represent more moral distress.
Time frame: 20 weeks
The single-item question was high reliability and validity (Dolbier et al., 2005) and has been used in previous studies in LTC homes (Schwendimann et al., 2016). Respondents rate job satisfaction on a 4-point scale ranging from strongly dissatisfied (1) to strongly satisfied (4), where higher scores indicate more satisfaction.
Time frame: 20 weeks
Respondents rate their health on a 5-point scale ranging from poor (0) to excellent (4), where higher scores indicate better health.
Time frame: 20 weeks
Respondents rate their mental health on a 5-point scale ranging from poor (0) to excellent (4), where higher scores indicate better mental health.
Time frame: 20 weeks
The 5-item scale asks respondents to rate their perception of support from the nurse practitioner in 5 situations on a 5-point scale ranging from never (0) to always (5), where higher scores indicate more perceived support.
Time frame: 15 weeks
Average and range of huddle duration were measured.
Time frame: 15 weeks
Attendance of categories of staff at huddles was summarized as percentage of total huddles attended.
Time frame: 15 weeks
Data was summarized as total number of huddles delivered and number of huddles delivered per week.
Time frame: 15 weeks
Data included huddle topic and aim, sharing of a positive event, maintaining a collaborative culture, and creation of a risk management plan and was summarized as number of huddles adhering to the structure.
Time frame: 1 year
This is a quality indicator obtained from the Resident Assessment Instrument - Minimum Data Set (RAI-MDS) 2.0. Depression Rating Scale is based on the following items: negative statements (E1a), persistent anger (E1d), expression of unrealistic fears (E1f), repetitive health complaints (E1h), repetitive anxious complaints (E1ii), sad, pained, worried facial expression (E1l), crying, tearfulness (E1m). The score ranges from 0 to 14, where a score of 3 or more may indicate a potential or actual problem with depression.
Time frame: 1 year
This is a quality indicator obtained from the RAI-MDS 2.0. Aggressive Behaviour Scale is based on the following items: verbally abusive (E4b), physically abusive (E4c), socially inappropriate/disruptive behaviour (E4d), resists care (E4e). Scores range from 0 to 12, where higher scores indicate higher levels of aggressive behaviour.
Time frame: 1 year
This is a quality indicator obtained from the RAI-MDS 2.0. Cognitive Performance Scale is based on the following items: comatose (B1), short-term memory (B2a), cognition skills for daily decision-making (B4), expressive communication (C4), eating (G1hA). The sores range from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate more severe cognitive impairment.
Time frame: 1 year
This is a quality indicator obtained from the RAI-MDS 2.0. CHESS is based on the following items: decline in cognition (B6), decline in ADL (G9), dehydration (J1c), edema (J1g), shortness of breath (J1l), vomiting (J1o), end-stage disease (J5c), weight loss (K3a), leaving food uneaten (K4c). The score ranges from 0 to 5, where higher scores indicate higher levels of medical complexity and are associated with adverse outcomes.
Time frame: 1 year
This is a quality indicator obtained from the RAI-MDS 2.0. ISE is based on the following items: at ease interacting with others (F1a), at ease doing planned or structured activities (F1b), at ease doing self-initiated activities (F1c), establishes own goals (F1d), pursues involvement in the life of the facility (F1e), accepts invitations into most group activities (F1f). The scores range from 0-6, where higher scores indicate higher levels of social engagement.
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute
Other
Nurse Practitioner Led Implementation of Team Huddles in Long-Term Care Homes During COVID-19
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07455370
Behavior, Mental Disorders
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06792084
Ethics, Moral Distress
Sivas, Center, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06258395
Moral Distress
Bilecik, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT00360711
Genetic Counseling, Moral Distress
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details