Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05203185

Nudging Provider Adoption of Clinical Decision Support

The central hypothesis of this proposal is that the addition of a theory-informed "nudge" to a clinical decision support (CDS) tool will address identified behavioral barriers to use and significantly improve adoption by providers. Nudges are applications of behavioral science, defined as positive reinforcement and indirect suggestions that have a non-forced effect on decision making. This study will use a behavioral theory-informed process to develop a new CDS tool that includes a nudge that addresses barriers to adoption.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

25 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Huntington Hospital, Huntington, New York, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The research team developed and pilot tested two CDS tools for pulmonary embolism (PE) risk stratification in the Emergency Department (ED). One of the tools incorporated two behavioral theory-informed nudges in the user interface. The research team's objective was to pilot test the tools to demonstrate feasibility as well as examine preliminary efficacy of the nudges on provider adoption of the tool. This cluster non-randomized controlled trial took place between September 20th, 2021 and March 3rd, 2022 in two EDs that are a part of a large academic health system in the New York City metropolitan area. All ED providers (physicians, physician assistants and nurse practitioners) seeing patients for the evaluation of PE during this time were included in the trial. The EDs were chosen based on their comparable size and acuity levels.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Medical doctors, nurse practitioners and physician assistants working full time at Huntington Hospital and Long Island Jewish Valley Stream

Exclusion criteria

  • Does not meet the inclusion criteria

Treatment and study plan

Pulmonary Embolism Risk Kalculator (PERK)

Other

Nudges are applications of behavioral science, defined as positive reinforcement and indirect suggestions that have a non-forced effect on decision making. Nudges will be to the PE CALC CDS tool to develop the new CDS tool, PERK.

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patient Visits Where the Provider Adopted the Pulmonary Embolism Risk Kalculator (PERK) Tool

    Time frame: Up to Month 6

    The tool is considered adopted during a patient visit if the provider accepted the recommendation given by the PERK tool (i.e., a D-dimer was recommended and ordered or a CT pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) was recommended and ordered). This outcome measure is assessed using electronic health record (EHR) data from the patient visit.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of PE-Designated CTPA Tests That Are Positive for PE

    Time frame: Up to Month 6

    Monitored using EHR reporting data. Calculated as the percentage of CTPA tests ordered to evaluate for PE that are positive for PE.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

NYU Langone Health

Other

Collaborators

  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Jan 24, 2022
Registry last updated
Jun 26, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.