Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07476274

Nosocomial Pneumonia After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Observational studies of patients with coronary artery bypass grafting, associated with an unfavorable cardiopulmonary prognosis for at least one year after surgery.

This is Prospective, cohort, unblinded, observational comparable single center clinical trial. To compare the clinical, laboratory (including complete blood count, metabolic panel, and specific cardiac, inflammatory, infectious, and endothelial biomarkers), functional (ECG, echocardiography, ultrasound, spirometry, cardiopulmonary exercise testing), and radiological (chest X-ray/CT) phenotypes in patients with coronary artery bypass grafting with and without non-ventilator-associated postoperative, nosocomial pneumonia; to identify the factors of early and 1-years cardiopulmonary prognosis.

Increased risk of cardiovascular outcomes is related with the circulatory arrest, artificial circulation, perioperative trauma and respiratory complications of the postoperative period associating to the different severity and duration of the systemic inflammatory response, immune status disorders, hemostasis disorder, endothelial dysfunction, external respiration dysfunction, anatomic and functional disorders in the heart and lungs. Individual predictors of an unfavorable prognosis can be determined at the stage of before and just after surgery to conduct personalized prevention.

This study aimed to compare the clinical, laboratory (including complete blood count, metabolic panel, and specific cardiac, inflammatory, infectious, and endothelial biomarkers), functional (ECG, echocardiography, ultrasound, spirometry, cardiopulmonary exercise testing), and radiological (chest X-ray/CT) phenotypes in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting with and without non-ventilator-associated postoperative nosocomial pneumonia; to identify the factors of early and 1-years cardiopulmonary prognosis.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

About this study

RESEARCH RELEVANCE Cardiovascular diseases (CVD), remain the leading cause of death worldwide. In 2017, mortality from cardiovascular diseases reached 862,895 people, or 587.6 per 100,000 of the population. Coronary artery disease (CAD) holds the leading position in the structure of causes of death from CVD. The annual mortality rate from CAD is 27%, with 42% of all deceased being of working age. Myocardial revascularization is one of the most common surgical procedures for the effective treatment of CAD. In the United States, over 200,000 coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgeries are performed annually, with approximately 14% of patients being rehospitalized within 30 days after discharge and another 10% visiting emergency departments due to surgery-related complications and care issues. Pulmonary complications, primarily pneumonia (3%-42%), account for a significant proportion of the complications. Although pneumonia primarily affects the lungs, growing evidence suggests that it can have a negative impact on many systems and organs, particularly the cardiovascular system. The impact of pneumonia on the starting CVD consist the most evidences. The short-term and long-term impact of nosocomial pneumonia (NP) on the course of determined CVD, especially following myocardial revascularization performed using coronary bypass grafting (CABG) has not been previously assessed, and potential mechanisms have not been studied. It is known that the CABG leads to an enhanced systemic inflammatory response, is associated with nitric oxide deficiency, endothelial dysfunction, and procoagulant activity. Therefore, a postoperative complication in the form of NP in patients with multivessel CAD and not rare anatomic and functional myocardial disorders could potentially lead to a short-term additive enhancement of the inflammatory and endothelial response associated with the surgery, and to long-term activation of immune inflammation after CABG. The consequence of this may be an increased frequency of any complications within one year or more after surgery and a reduction in its effectiveness in reversing signs of coronary and heart failure. However, there is no confirmation of this assumption. The impact of pneumonia complications, such as respiratory failure, on the course of stable CAD is also insufficiently studied.

The study will be conducted at the Cardiology Research Institute - a branch of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences" (Cardiology Research Institute of the Tomsk NRMC) in Tomsk, Russia, from December 2024 to June 2027. The study was approved by the Biomedical Ethics Committee of the Cardiology Research Institute of the Tomsk NRMC on December 25, 2024. Informed consent will be obtained from all study participants after the nature, purpose, and potential risks of the study have been explained to them.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that in patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing CABG, the occurrence of postoperative nosocomial pneumonia is associated with an adverse cardiopulmonary prognosis for at least one year after surgery.

SRCONDARY OBJECTIVES To compare the clinical, cellular, secretory, and instrumental profiles, as well as their in-hospital dynamics, between patients with an uncomplicated postoperative course and those complicated by nosocomial pneumonia.

To assess the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of pulmonary and systemic criteria for diagnosing nosocomial pneumonia in patients with CAD following surgical myocardial revascularization; to identify the most specific systemic diagnostic criteria or propose new ones.

In a prospective one-year follow-up study of patients with CAD corrected by CABG, to evaluate the impact of nosocomial pneumonia on cardiopulmonary prognosis; to identify in-hospital predictors of an unfavorable prognosis for the purpose of personalized prevention.

The effectiveness of the study will be assessed by such a concept as "end point".

The primary endpoint was assessed at visits 5, 6, and 7 as the difference in parameters between the groups with pneumonia and without pneumonia and included the frequency of occurrence of one or more cardiovascular and/or respiratory endpoint events.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years and older.
  • Myocardial revascularization for CAD via CABG during the current hospitalization, in accordance with the indications defined by the ESC/EACTS Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394].
  • Successful transfer from the intensive care unit to a general ward after surgery.
  • One or more of the risk factor for nosocomial pneumonia [doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2024-6094].
  • Signed informed consent for participation in the study.

Pre-operative Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute coronary syndrome within the last 1 month.
  • Combined surgical intervention for infective endocarditis.
  • Combined valve surgery.
  • Concomitant pulmonary disease requiring respiratory support prior to surgery.
  • Presence of a tracheostomy.
  • Participation in another clinical trial at the time of potential inclusion or within the preceding 3 months.
  • Diagnosis of malignant neoplasms within the last 5 years.
  • Life duration of less than 1 year.
  • HIV infection.

Peri-operative Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP).
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction after CABG and before inclusion.
  • Acute Stroke after CABG and before inclusion.
  • Pulmonary after CABG and before inclusion.
  • Pulmonary Edema after CABG and before inclusion.
  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) after CABG and before inclusion.
  • Pneumothorax requiring drainage after CABG and before inclusion.
  • Delirium after CABG and before inclusion.
  • Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage 4-5 / Acute Kidney Injury requiring renal replacement therapy or chronic dialysis.
  • Any perioperative complication requiring the patient's return to the intensive care unit or prolonging the ICU stay beyond 48 hours.
  • Any other active infectious process at a different site.
  • Novel Coronavirus Infection (COVID-19).

Treatment and study plan

Clinical, laboratory, and instrumental examination

Other

Clinical, laboratory, and instrumental examinations will be performed to achieve the specified primary and secondary endpoints.

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of combined cardiovascular+respiratory endpoint (percentage);

    Time frame: 12 months

    The study will assess the incidence (percentage) of occurrence of combined cardiovascular+respiratory endpoint that includes the following events:

    • Cardiovascular events: All-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, myocardial revascularization, acute cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, hospitalization or emergency medical service visit for acute heart failure or decompensation of chronic heart failure, hospitalization for cardiac arrhythmias, new-onset atrial fibrillation.
    • Respiratory events: Respiratory mortality, hospitalization for broncho-obstructive or broncho-restrictive diseases, new oxygen dependence, initiation of non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation, new diagnosis of bronchial asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease n the frequency of occurrence of one or more cardiovascular and/or respiratory endpoint events.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Levels of procalcitonin (ng/ml);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the levels of procalcitonin;

  2. Levels of interleukins 1 (pg/ml);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the levels of interleukins 1.

  3. Changes in immune status (in percent);

    Time frame: 30 days

    Difference between groups in the changes in immune status;

  4. Level of endothelin-1 (ET-1) (pg/ml);

    Time frame: 6 months

    Difference between groups in the level of endothelin-1 (ET-1);

  5. Level of presepsin (pg/ml);

    Time frame: 6 months

    Difference between groups in the levels of presepsin

  6. Interleukins 6(pg/ml);

    Time frame: 6 months

    Difference between groups in the levels of interleukins 6;

  7. Tumor Necrosis Factor α (TNF-α)(pg/ml);

    Time frame: 6 months

    Difference between groups in the levels of TNF-α;

  8. Level of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (pg/ml);

    Time frame: 6 months

    Difference between groups in the level of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF);

  9. Difference between groups in the level of endocan (pg/ml);

    Time frame: 6 months

    Level of endocan .

Other outcomes

  1. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) levels (mmHg);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the levels of SBP

  2. Level of NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) (pg/ml);

    Time frame: 6 months

    Difference between groups in the NT-proBNP level;

  3. Presence of life-threatening and symptomatic cardiac arrhythmias (in percent);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the presence of life-threatening and symptomatic cardiac arrhythmias

  4. Severity of systemic inflammatory response syndrome manifestations (in percent);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the severity of systemic inflammatory response syndrome manifestations (fever, leukocytosis, left shift in the leukocyte formula, categorized by phenotypes).

  5. Level of Troponin I (ng/ml);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the Troponin I level;

  6. Heart failure class according to NYHA (New York Heart Association) (in percent);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the Heart failure class according to NYHA

  7. Result of calculating inflammatory indices/scores (in percent);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the result of calculating inflammatory indices/scores;

  8. Dynamics of ventilatory parameters during spiroergometry (in percent);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the dynamics of ventilatory parameters during spiroergometry;

  9. Severity of ventilatory impairments during spirometry (in percent);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the severity of ventilatory impairments during spirometry;

  10. Worsening of chronic heart failure by NYHA(New York Heart Association) Functional Class I or more during prospective follow-up (in percent);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the worsening of CHF by NYHA Functional Class I or more during prospective follow-up; increase in dosage / initiation of diuretics; first-time prescription of antiarrhythmic drugs during prospective follow-up.

  11. Exercise tolerance during spiroergometry (in percent);

    Time frame: 6 months

    Difference between groups in the exercise tolerance during spiroergometry.

  12. Tiffeneau index (in percent);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the Tiffeneau index,

  13. Frequency of glucocorticoid prescription (in percent);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the frequency of glucocorticoid prescription;

  14. Frequency of transfer to the ICU (Intensive Care Unit) (in percent);

    Time frame: 30 days

    Difference between groups in the frequency of transfer to the ICU;

  15. Frequency of sepsis/septic shock development (in percent);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the frequency of sepsis and septic shock development.

  16. Difference between groups in the onset of respiratory failure (RF) or its worsening by 1 grade or more (in percent);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the onset of respiratory failure (RF) or its worsening by 1 grade or more during prospective follow-up;

  17. Exercise duration during spiroergometry, achieved heart rate (in percent);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the exercise duration during spiroergometry, achieved heart rate;

  18. Level and dynamics of EQ-5D-5L quality of life questionnaire scores (in percent);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the level and dynamics of EQ-5D-5L quality of life questionnaire scores;

  19. Need for and duration of respiratory support (in percent);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the need for and duration of respiratory support;

  20. Level and dynamics of body temperature (°C);

    Time frame: 30 days

    Difference between groups in the level and dynamics of body temperature;

  21. Prescription of inhaled bronchodilators (in percent);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the prescription of inhaled bronchodilators for continuous use during prospective follow-up.

  22. Forced expiratory volume (L/s);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the forced expiratory volume is measured in liters per second (L/s).

  23. Forced vital capacity (L)

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the forced vital capacity is measured in liters (L).

  24. Vital capacity (L)

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the vital capacity is measured in liters (L).

  25. The Six-Minute Walk test (6MWT) (in meters);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the Six-Minute Walk test (6MWT)

  26. Level of the Medical Research Council (from 0 to 4) dyspnea scale;

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the level of the Medical Research Council (from 0 to 4) dyspnea scale.

    0 - Not troubled by breathlessness except on strenuous exercise

    • - Short of breath when hurrying or walking up a slight hill
    • - Walks slower than contemporaries on level ground because of breathlessness, or has to stop for breath when walking at own pace
    • - Stops for breath after walking about 100m or after a few minutes on level ground
    • - Too breathless to leave the house, or breathless when dressing or undressing
  27. Respiratory rate (RR) (bpm);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the respiratory rate is measured in breaths per minute.

  28. Length of hospital stay after surgery (days);

    Time frame: 30 days

    Difference between groups in the length of hospital stay after surgery;

  29. Level of peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) (in percent);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the SpO2 levels

  30. Medication adherence (in percent);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the medication adherence;

  31. Degree of respiratory failure (in percent);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the degree of respiratory failure;

  32. Any other postoperative complications (in percent);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in any other postoperative complications.

  33. Right ventricular fractional area change (RVFAC) (in percent);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the Right ventricular fractional area change (RVFAC);

  34. Right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) (mmHg);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the Right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP);

  35. Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain (LV GLS) (in percent);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain

  36. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (EDVI);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (EDVI)

  37. Angina Functional Class (in percent);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the Angina Functional Class

  38. Heart rate (HR) (bpm);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in heart rate is measured in beats per minute.

  39. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) Levels (mm Hg);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the levels of DBP;

  40. Left ventricular stroke index (SI) (in percent);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the left ventricular stroke index (SI).

  41. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (in percent);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

  42. Wall motion score index (WMSI);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the wall motion score index (WMSI);

  43. Frequency of significant ST-segment depression during spiroergometry (in percent);

    Time frame: 6 months

    Difference between groups in the frequency of significant ST-segment depression during spiroergometry.

  44. Depth and time of onset of ST-segment depression during spiroergometry (in percent);

    Time frame: 6 months

    Difference between groups in the depth of ST-segment depression during spiroergometry;

  45. Time of onset of ST-segment depression during spiroergometry (in percent);

    Time frame: 6 months

    Difference between groups in the time of onset of ST-segment depression during spiroergometry;

  46. Cardiac arrhythmias during spiroergometry (in percent);

    Time frame: 6 months

    Difference between groups in the cardiac arrhythmias during spiroergometry;

  47. Increase in dosage / initiation of diuretics; first-time prescription of antiarrhythmic drugs during prospective follow-up (in percent);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the increase in dosage / initiation of diuretics during prospective follow-up.

  48. First-time prescription of antiarrhythmic drugs during prospective follow-up (in percent);

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between groups in the first-time prescription of antiarrhythmic drugs during prospective follow-up.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Roman S. Timoshenko, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+79539244630

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Impact of Nosocomial Pneumonia on the Outcome and Prognosis of Stable Coronary Artery Disease After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Acronym: CABG-PNEUM

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2027
First posted
Mar 17, 2026
Registry last updated
Mar 23, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.