Cardiology Research Institute of Tomsk NRMC
Tomsk, Tomsk Oblast, 634012, Russia
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07476274
Observational studies of patients with coronary artery bypass grafting, associated with an unfavorable cardiopulmonary prognosis for at least one year after surgery.
This is Prospective, cohort, unblinded, observational comparable single center clinical trial. To compare the clinical, laboratory (including complete blood count, metabolic panel, and specific cardiac, inflammatory, infectious, and endothelial biomarkers), functional (ECG, echocardiography, ultrasound, spirometry, cardiopulmonary exercise testing), and radiological (chest X-ray/CT) phenotypes in patients with coronary artery bypass grafting with and without non-ventilator-associated postoperative, nosocomial pneumonia; to identify the factors of early and 1-years cardiopulmonary prognosis.
Increased risk of cardiovascular outcomes is related with the circulatory arrest, artificial circulation, perioperative trauma and respiratory complications of the postoperative period associating to the different severity and duration of the systemic inflammatory response, immune status disorders, hemostasis disorder, endothelial dysfunction, external respiration dysfunction, anatomic and functional disorders in the heart and lungs. Individual predictors of an unfavorable prognosis can be determined at the stage of before and just after surgery to conduct personalized prevention.
This study aimed to compare the clinical, laboratory (including complete blood count, metabolic panel, and specific cardiac, inflammatory, infectious, and endothelial biomarkers), functional (ECG, echocardiography, ultrasound, spirometry, cardiopulmonary exercise testing), and radiological (chest X-ray/CT) phenotypes in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting with and without non-ventilator-associated postoperative nosocomial pneumonia; to identify the factors of early and 1-years cardiopulmonary prognosis.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Tomsk, Tomsk Oblast, 634012, Russia
Location status: Recruiting
RESEARCH RELEVANCE Cardiovascular diseases (CVD), remain the leading cause of death worldwide. In 2017, mortality from cardiovascular diseases reached 862,895 people, or 587.6 per 100,000 of the population. Coronary artery disease (CAD) holds the leading position in the structure of causes of death from CVD. The annual mortality rate from CAD is 27%, with 42% of all deceased being of working age. Myocardial revascularization is one of the most common surgical procedures for the effective treatment of CAD. In the United States, over 200,000 coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgeries are performed annually, with approximately 14% of patients being rehospitalized within 30 days after discharge and another 10% visiting emergency departments due to surgery-related complications and care issues. Pulmonary complications, primarily pneumonia (3%-42%), account for a significant proportion of the complications. Although pneumonia primarily affects the lungs, growing evidence suggests that it can have a negative impact on many systems and organs, particularly the cardiovascular system. The impact of pneumonia on the starting CVD consist the most evidences. The short-term and long-term impact of nosocomial pneumonia (NP) on the course of determined CVD, especially following myocardial revascularization performed using coronary bypass grafting (CABG) has not been previously assessed, and potential mechanisms have not been studied. It is known that the CABG leads to an enhanced systemic inflammatory response, is associated with nitric oxide deficiency, endothelial dysfunction, and procoagulant activity. Therefore, a postoperative complication in the form of NP in patients with multivessel CAD and not rare anatomic and functional myocardial disorders could potentially lead to a short-term additive enhancement of the inflammatory and endothelial response associated with the surgery, and to long-term activation of immune inflammation after CABG. The consequence of this may be an increased frequency of any complications within one year or more after surgery and a reduction in its effectiveness in reversing signs of coronary and heart failure. However, there is no confirmation of this assumption. The impact of pneumonia complications, such as respiratory failure, on the course of stable CAD is also insufficiently studied.
The study will be conducted at the Cardiology Research Institute - a branch of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences" (Cardiology Research Institute of the Tomsk NRMC) in Tomsk, Russia, from December 2024 to June 2027. The study was approved by the Biomedical Ethics Committee of the Cardiology Research Institute of the Tomsk NRMC on December 25, 2024. Informed consent will be obtained from all study participants after the nature, purpose, and potential risks of the study have been explained to them.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that in patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing CABG, the occurrence of postoperative nosocomial pneumonia is associated with an adverse cardiopulmonary prognosis for at least one year after surgery.
SRCONDARY OBJECTIVES To compare the clinical, cellular, secretory, and instrumental profiles, as well as their in-hospital dynamics, between patients with an uncomplicated postoperative course and those complicated by nosocomial pneumonia.
To assess the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of pulmonary and systemic criteria for diagnosing nosocomial pneumonia in patients with CAD following surgical myocardial revascularization; to identify the most specific systemic diagnostic criteria or propose new ones.
In a prospective one-year follow-up study of patients with CAD corrected by CABG, to evaluate the impact of nosocomial pneumonia on cardiopulmonary prognosis; to identify in-hospital predictors of an unfavorable prognosis for the purpose of personalized prevention.
The effectiveness of the study will be assessed by such a concept as "end point".
The primary endpoint was assessed at visits 5, 6, and 7 as the difference in parameters between the groups with pneumonia and without pneumonia and included the frequency of occurrence of one or more cardiovascular and/or respiratory endpoint events.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Pre-operative Exclusion Criteria:
Peri-operative Exclusion Criteria:
Clinical, laboratory, and instrumental examinations will be performed to achieve the specified primary and secondary endpoints.
Time frame: 12 months
The study will assess the incidence (percentage) of occurrence of combined cardiovascular+respiratory endpoint that includes the following events:
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the levels of procalcitonin;
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the levels of interleukins 1.
Time frame: 30 days
Difference between groups in the changes in immune status;
Time frame: 6 months
Difference between groups in the level of endothelin-1 (ET-1);
Time frame: 6 months
Difference between groups in the levels of presepsin
Time frame: 6 months
Difference between groups in the levels of interleukins 6;
Time frame: 6 months
Difference between groups in the levels of TNF-α;
Time frame: 6 months
Difference between groups in the level of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF);
Time frame: 6 months
Level of endocan .
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the levels of SBP
Time frame: 6 months
Difference between groups in the NT-proBNP level;
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the presence of life-threatening and symptomatic cardiac arrhythmias
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the severity of systemic inflammatory response syndrome manifestations (fever, leukocytosis, left shift in the leukocyte formula, categorized by phenotypes).
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the Troponin I level;
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the Heart failure class according to NYHA
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the result of calculating inflammatory indices/scores;
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the dynamics of ventilatory parameters during spiroergometry;
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the severity of ventilatory impairments during spirometry;
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the worsening of CHF by NYHA Functional Class I or more during prospective follow-up; increase in dosage / initiation of diuretics; first-time prescription of antiarrhythmic drugs during prospective follow-up.
Time frame: 6 months
Difference between groups in the exercise tolerance during spiroergometry.
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the Tiffeneau index,
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the frequency of glucocorticoid prescription;
Time frame: 30 days
Difference between groups in the frequency of transfer to the ICU;
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the frequency of sepsis and septic shock development.
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the onset of respiratory failure (RF) or its worsening by 1 grade or more during prospective follow-up;
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the exercise duration during spiroergometry, achieved heart rate;
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the level and dynamics of EQ-5D-5L quality of life questionnaire scores;
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the need for and duration of respiratory support;
Time frame: 30 days
Difference between groups in the level and dynamics of body temperature;
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the prescription of inhaled bronchodilators for continuous use during prospective follow-up.
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the forced expiratory volume is measured in liters per second (L/s).
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the forced vital capacity is measured in liters (L).
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the vital capacity is measured in liters (L).
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the Six-Minute Walk test (6MWT)
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the level of the Medical Research Council (from 0 to 4) dyspnea scale.
0 - Not troubled by breathlessness except on strenuous exercise
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the respiratory rate is measured in breaths per minute.
Time frame: 30 days
Difference between groups in the length of hospital stay after surgery;
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the SpO2 levels
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the medication adherence;
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the degree of respiratory failure;
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in any other postoperative complications.
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the Right ventricular fractional area change (RVFAC);
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the Right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP);
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (EDVI)
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the Angina Functional Class
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in heart rate is measured in beats per minute.
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the levels of DBP;
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the left ventricular stroke index (SI).
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the wall motion score index (WMSI);
Time frame: 6 months
Difference between groups in the frequency of significant ST-segment depression during spiroergometry.
Time frame: 6 months
Difference between groups in the depth of ST-segment depression during spiroergometry;
Time frame: 6 months
Difference between groups in the time of onset of ST-segment depression during spiroergometry;
Time frame: 6 months
Difference between groups in the cardiac arrhythmias during spiroergometry;
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the increase in dosage / initiation of diuretics during prospective follow-up.
Time frame: 12 months
Difference between groups in the first-time prescription of antiarrhythmic drugs during prospective follow-up.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Other
The Impact of Nosocomial Pneumonia on the Outcome and Prognosis of Stable Coronary Artery Disease After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Acronym: CABG-PNEUM
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01476995
Acute Kidney Injury, Acute Renal Failure
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07720349
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Arendal, Norway
View Trial DetailsNCT02038127
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Chuncheon, Gangwon-do, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT07190690
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Alicante, Spain
View Trial Details