Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00140530

Nonpolymer- and Polymer-Based Drug-Eluting Stents for Restenosis (ISAR-TEST-1)

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of nonpolymer-based rapamycin-eluting stent compared to standard polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent to reduce reblockage of coronary arteries.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen, Munich, Germany

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Drug-eluting stents represent a major advance in the treatment of restenosis. They have dramatically reduced the need of repeat revascularization procedures, and, thanks to the excellent results obtained in various patient subsets, these devices are now used in almost 90% of the stent implantation procedures performed in US hospitals. Along with the increasing number of patients receiving drug-eluting stents and availability of long-term follow-up data, concern has arisen regarding the safety of these devices. At the core of this concern is the potential for increased inflammatory and thrombogenic responses and their life-threatening consequences associated with the polymers employed for the delivery of antirestenotic agents. A growing interest has been shown on polymer-free stents with a microporous surface as an alternative to stents employing polymeric coating for local drug delivery. Recently, we developed a mobile system which enables coating in the catheterization laboratory of polymeric free stents with different drug doses or combinations. Using a porcine coronary model of restenosis, we found that coating with rapamycin of a polymer-free microporous stent is feasible and effectively reduces neointimal proliferation. More recently, in a clinical study in which the efficacy of several doses of rapamycin was assessed, we showed that non-polymer coating with rapamycin is safe and leads to a dose-dependent reduction in restenosis. While the advantage deriving from the lack of polymeric cover in on-site coated rapamycin-eluting stents is readily understandable, their relative efficacy as compared with commercially available polymer-based drug-eluting stents has yet to be evaluated.

Comparison:

Polymer-free microporous stents coated with rapamycin versus standard polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stents

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients at least 18 years old
  • Stable or unstable angina or a positive stress test
  • "de novo" coronary artery lesions
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Myocardial infarction within 48 h. before enrollment
  • Target lesion located in left main trunk
  • Contraindication or known allergy to aspirin, heparin, thienopyridines, rapamycin, paclitaxel or stainless steel

Treatment and study plan

Paclitaxel-eluting stent (TAXUS)

Device

patients has been implanted the Paclitaxel-eluting stent.

Other names: Taxus

Rapamycin-eluting stent

Device

patients has been implanted the Rapamycin-eluting stent.

Primary outcomes

  1. In-stent late luminal loss

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Angiographic restenosis at follow-up angiography

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Need for target lesion revascularization due restenosis at 9 months

    Time frame: 9 months

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen

Other

Collaborators

  • Bayerische Forschungsstiftung Muenchen

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Trial of a Nonpolymer-Based Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Versus a Polymer-Based Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent for the Prevention of Restenosis (ISAR-TEST-1)

Important dates

Study start
2004
Study completion
2005
First posted
Sep 1, 2005
Registry last updated
Jan 11, 2008

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.