Paclitaxel-eluting stent (TAXUS)
Devicepatients has been implanted the Paclitaxel-eluting stent.
Other names: Taxus
NCT Number: NCT00140530
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of nonpolymer-based rapamycin-eluting stent compared to standard polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent to reduce reblockage of coronary arteries.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen, Munich, Germany
Drug-eluting stents represent a major advance in the treatment of restenosis. They have dramatically reduced the need of repeat revascularization procedures, and, thanks to the excellent results obtained in various patient subsets, these devices are now used in almost 90% of the stent implantation procedures performed in US hospitals. Along with the increasing number of patients receiving drug-eluting stents and availability of long-term follow-up data, concern has arisen regarding the safety of these devices. At the core of this concern is the potential for increased inflammatory and thrombogenic responses and their life-threatening consequences associated with the polymers employed for the delivery of antirestenotic agents. A growing interest has been shown on polymer-free stents with a microporous surface as an alternative to stents employing polymeric coating for local drug delivery. Recently, we developed a mobile system which enables coating in the catheterization laboratory of polymeric free stents with different drug doses or combinations. Using a porcine coronary model of restenosis, we found that coating with rapamycin of a polymer-free microporous stent is feasible and effectively reduces neointimal proliferation. More recently, in a clinical study in which the efficacy of several doses of rapamycin was assessed, we showed that non-polymer coating with rapamycin is safe and leads to a dose-dependent reduction in restenosis. While the advantage deriving from the lack of polymeric cover in on-site coated rapamycin-eluting stents is readily understandable, their relative efficacy as compared with commercially available polymer-based drug-eluting stents has yet to be evaluated.
Comparison:
Polymer-free microporous stents coated with rapamycin versus standard polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stents
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
patients has been implanted the Paclitaxel-eluting stent.
Other names: Taxus
patients has been implanted the Rapamycin-eluting stent.
Time frame: 6 months
Time frame: 6 months
Time frame: 9 months
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
Other
A Randomized Trial of a Nonpolymer-Based Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Versus a Polymer-Based Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent for the Prevention of Restenosis (ISAR-TEST-1)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02579655
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT04580017
Angina Pectoris, Angina, Unstable
Hammam Sousse, Sousse Governorate, Tunisia
View Trial DetailsNCT00248352
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT00241735
Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease
View Trial Details