Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04698343

Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Restless Legs Syndrome During Opioid Medication Reduction

Prospective open-label single-arm feasibility study assessing the tolerability of opioid medication reduction in conjunction with noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation (NPNS) for patients taking prescription opioids to treat moderate-severe primary RLS.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–89 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Mark J Buchfuhrer private practice, Downey, California, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

For RLS patients taking a stable dose of prescription opioid medications prior to study entry, iterative opioid dose reduction is performed in conjunction with open-label NPNS treatment. For each of two iterative step-downs in opioid dose (step-down #1 and step-down #2), a 1-2-week run-in phase to allow resolution of opioid withdrawal symptoms unrelated to RLS is followed by a 1-wk assessment phase to evaluate if RLS symptoms have increased. Study participation is terminated if there is a clinically significant increase in RLS severity during the assessment phase or if there are intolerable opioid withdrawal symptoms at any time. Participants who tolerate both step-downs have the option of an extension phase involving a third step-down with the same format.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject has received a medical diagnosis of primary restless legs syndrome (RLS)
  • Subject is currently taking a stable dose of at least one prescription opioid for RLS, where the total opioid dose is less than or equal to 60mg morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per day.
  • RLS symptoms are most significant in the subject's legs and/or feet.
  • Subject possesses the necessary equipment, internet/phone accessibility, and communication ability to complete electronic questionnaires and respond to electronic communications and phone calls from the research staff throughout the in-home portion of the study.
  • Subject is 18 to 89 years of age (inclusive) when written informed consent is obtained.
  • Subject has signed a valid, Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved informed consent form, can understand the requirements of the study and instructions for device usage, and can converse in English.
  • Subject has been taking a stable dose and schedule of prescription opioids for RLS for at least 3 months prior to enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

  • Subject has RLS that is known to be caused by another diagnosed condition (i.e. secondary RLS).
  • Subject was misdiagnosed with RLS, as determined by the investigator (e.g. actual diagnosis of Periodic Leg Movement Disorder (PLMD), arthritis, leg spasms or neuropathy without comorbid RLS).
  • Subject has primary sleep disorder other than RLS that significantly interferes with sleep at the present time (e.g. unmanaged sleep apnea or general insomnia).
  • Subject has been diagnosed with one of the following conditions at any time: Epilepsy or other seizure disorder, Severe movement disorder symptoms (Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, dyskinesia, dystonia), Deep Vein Thrombosis, Multiple sclerosis
  • Subject has an active diagnosis of one of the following conditions: Acute or chronic infection other than viral upper respiratory tract infections, Stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease or renal failure, Iron-deficient anemia, Severe edema affecting lower legs
  • Subject has any of the following at the location of device application: Acute injury, Cellulitis, Open sores
  • Subject has a malignancy within the past 5 years (not including basal or squamous cell skin cancer)
  • Subject is on dialysis or anticipated to start dialysis while participating in the study
  • Subject has severe peripheral neuropathy affecting the lower legs and/or subject has neuropathy and is unable to clearly distinguish between symptoms of neuropathy and symptoms of RLS.
  • During NPNS calibration, subject has a sensation threshold above the upper-cutoff value (e.g. 30mA), the subject finds stimulation intensities less than 15 mA to be uncomfortable or distracting, or the device does not properly fit the subject.
  • Subject has significantly changed dose or schedule of a medication that may impact RLS symptoms within the 30 days prior to enrollment, as judged by the investigator (e.g. antidepressants, sleep medications, sedative antihistamines).
  • Subject has received an investigational drug or device within the last 30 days or is planning to receive an investigational device during the duration of the study.
  • Subject has another medical condition that may affect validity of the study as determined by the investigator.
  • Subject is unable or unwilling to comply with study requirements.
  • Moderate or severe cognitive disorder or mental illness.
  • Subject has prior experience with Noctrix Health NPNS devices.
  • Subject has active implantable medical devices anywhere in the body (including pacemakers), or metal implant at the site of study device electrode application.
  • Subject has known allergy to electrode gel, polyurethane foam, or lycra.
  • Subject is pregnant or trying to become pregnant.
  • Subject has undergone a major surgery (excluding dental work) in the previous 30 days.
  • Subject has another medical condition that may put the subject at risk as determined by the investigator.

Treatment and study plan

Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS)

Device

NPNS device programmed to deliver active stimulation.

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Subjects Without a Clinically Significant Increase in RLS Symptoms During the First Phase Involving an Opioid Dose Reduction of >= 20% Relative to Baseline.

    Time frame: Week 1

    Percentage of subjects without a clinically significant increase in RLS symptoms during the first Phase involving an opioid dose reduction of >= 20% relative to baseline. The clinically significant increase was assessed by determining the Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) score for the subject. Possible choices (followed by scale value) are: Very much improved (1), Much improved (2), Minimally improved (3), No change (4), Minimally worse (5), Much worse (6), Very Much Worse (7). Scores of 6 or 7 would be considered a clinically significant increase in RLS Symptoms.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Subjects Without a Clinically Significant Increase in RLS Symptoms During the First Phase Involving an Opioid Dose Reduction of >= 1/3 Relative to Baseline.

    Time frame: 1 week

    Percentage of subjects without a clinically significant increase in RLS symptoms during the first Phase involving an opioid dose reduction of >= 1/3 relative to baseline. The clinically significant increase was assessed by determining the Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) score for the subject. Possible choices (followed by scale value) are: Very much improved (1), Much improved (2), Minimally improved (3), No change (4), Minimally worse (5), Much worse (6), Very Much Worse (7). Scores of 6 or 7 would be considered a clinically significant increase in RLS Symptoms.

  2. Change From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) Score During Step-down #1 With an Opioid Dose Reduction of >=20%

    Time frame: 1 week

    IRLS is a participant-rated questionnaire that rates RLS severity from 0-40, where 40 is the most severe.

  3. Change From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) Score During Step-down #2 With an Opioid Dose Reduction of >=1/3

    Time frame: 1 week into Step-down #2

    IRLS is a participant-rated questionnaire that rates RLS severity from 0-40, where 40 is the most severe.

  4. Maximum Percent Change in Opioid Dose Relative to Baseline Without a Clinically Significant Increase in RLS Symptoms.

    Time frame: 1 week into final step-down

    The clinically significant increase was assessed by determining the Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) score for the subject. Possible choices (followed by scale value) are: Very much improved (1), Much improved (2), Minimally improved (3), No change (4), Minimally worse (5), Much worse (6), Very Much Worse (7). Scores of 6 or 7 would be considered a clinically significant increase in RLS Symptoms.

Other outcomes

  1. NPNS Tolerability Rate - Percentage of Subjects Who Withdrew From Optional Phase 3 Citing Lack of Tolerability of NPNS as the Primary Reason for Withdrawal.

    Time frame: Up to 9 weeks

    Percentage of subjects who withdraw from study prior to the optional Phase 3 citing lack of tolerability of NPNS as the primary reason for withdrawal. The criterion for success was fewer than 20% of subjects who begin NPNS treatment withdrawing for this reason.

  2. Percentage of Grade 2 or Higher NPNS-related Adverse Events.

    Time frame: Up to 9 weeks

    A Grade 2 adverse event is described as: moderate; minimal, local, or non-invasive intervention indicated; limiting age appropriate instrumental Activities of Daily Living such as preparing meals, shopping for groceries or clothes, using the telephone, and managing money. The success criteria was fewer than 20% Grade 2 or higher NPNS-related adverse events. (Definition from the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 NCI, NIH, US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). May 29, 2009 NIH publication #- 09-7473.)

  3. Percentage of Grade 3 or Higher NPNS-related Adverse Events.

    Time frame: Up to 9 weeks

    The criteria for success were no Grade 3 or higher NPNS-related adverse events. A Grade 3 adverse event was described as: Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care Activities of Daily Living such as bathing, dressing and undressing, feeding oneself, using the toilet, taking medications, and not being bedridden. (Definition from the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 NCI, NIH, DHHS. May 29, 2009 NIH publication #- 09-7473.)

  4. NPNS Adherence Ratio During Step-down #1 and Step-down #2.

    Time frame: 1 week post step-down

    NPNS adherence was based on the percent of device usage on nights with RLS symptoms during Assessment periods. Adherence was assessed during assessment periods based on objective electronic records of completed device sessions. Subjects were instructed to complete a device session on all days with RLS symptoms. The global criterion for success percentage was >=70%. The adherence ratio is the average days per week subjects completed device sessions divided by the average number of days that subjects experienced RLS symptoms.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Noctrix Health, Inc.

Industry

Collaborators

  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

Registry information

Official study title

Exploratory Study Assessing the Response of Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) Patients to Non-invasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS) During Opioid Medication Reduction

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Jan 6, 2021
Registry last updated
Sep 19, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.