Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS)
DeviceNPNS device programmed to deliver active stimulation.
NCT Number: NCT04698343
Prospective open-label single-arm feasibility study assessing the tolerability of opioid medication reduction in conjunction with noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation (NPNS) for patients taking prescription opioids to treat moderate-severe primary RLS.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–89 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Mark J Buchfuhrer private practice, Downey, California, United States
For RLS patients taking a stable dose of prescription opioid medications prior to study entry, iterative opioid dose reduction is performed in conjunction with open-label NPNS treatment. For each of two iterative step-downs in opioid dose (step-down #1 and step-down #2), a 1-2-week run-in phase to allow resolution of opioid withdrawal symptoms unrelated to RLS is followed by a 1-wk assessment phase to evaluate if RLS symptoms have increased. Study participation is terminated if there is a clinically significant increase in RLS severity during the assessment phase or if there are intolerable opioid withdrawal symptoms at any time. Participants who tolerate both step-downs have the option of an extension phase involving a third step-down with the same format.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
NPNS device programmed to deliver active stimulation.
Time frame: Week 1
Percentage of subjects without a clinically significant increase in RLS symptoms during the first Phase involving an opioid dose reduction of >= 20% relative to baseline. The clinically significant increase was assessed by determining the Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) score for the subject. Possible choices (followed by scale value) are: Very much improved (1), Much improved (2), Minimally improved (3), No change (4), Minimally worse (5), Much worse (6), Very Much Worse (7). Scores of 6 or 7 would be considered a clinically significant increase in RLS Symptoms.
Time frame: 1 week
Percentage of subjects without a clinically significant increase in RLS symptoms during the first Phase involving an opioid dose reduction of >= 1/3 relative to baseline. The clinically significant increase was assessed by determining the Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) score for the subject. Possible choices (followed by scale value) are: Very much improved (1), Much improved (2), Minimally improved (3), No change (4), Minimally worse (5), Much worse (6), Very Much Worse (7). Scores of 6 or 7 would be considered a clinically significant increase in RLS Symptoms.
Time frame: 1 week
IRLS is a participant-rated questionnaire that rates RLS severity from 0-40, where 40 is the most severe.
Time frame: 1 week into Step-down #2
IRLS is a participant-rated questionnaire that rates RLS severity from 0-40, where 40 is the most severe.
Time frame: 1 week into final step-down
The clinically significant increase was assessed by determining the Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) score for the subject. Possible choices (followed by scale value) are: Very much improved (1), Much improved (2), Minimally improved (3), No change (4), Minimally worse (5), Much worse (6), Very Much Worse (7). Scores of 6 or 7 would be considered a clinically significant increase in RLS Symptoms.
Time frame: Up to 9 weeks
Percentage of subjects who withdraw from study prior to the optional Phase 3 citing lack of tolerability of NPNS as the primary reason for withdrawal. The criterion for success was fewer than 20% of subjects who begin NPNS treatment withdrawing for this reason.
Time frame: Up to 9 weeks
A Grade 2 adverse event is described as: moderate; minimal, local, or non-invasive intervention indicated; limiting age appropriate instrumental Activities of Daily Living such as preparing meals, shopping for groceries or clothes, using the telephone, and managing money. The success criteria was fewer than 20% Grade 2 or higher NPNS-related adverse events. (Definition from the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 NCI, NIH, US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). May 29, 2009 NIH publication #- 09-7473.)
Time frame: Up to 9 weeks
The criteria for success were no Grade 3 or higher NPNS-related adverse events. A Grade 3 adverse event was described as: Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care Activities of Daily Living such as bathing, dressing and undressing, feeding oneself, using the toilet, taking medications, and not being bedridden. (Definition from the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 NCI, NIH, DHHS. May 29, 2009 NIH publication #- 09-7473.)
Time frame: 1 week post step-down
NPNS adherence was based on the percent of device usage on nights with RLS symptoms during Assessment periods. Adherence was assessed during assessment periods based on objective electronic records of completed device sessions. Subjects were instructed to complete a device session on all days with RLS symptoms. The global criterion for success percentage was >=70%. The adherence ratio is the average days per week subjects completed device sessions divided by the average number of days that subjects experienced RLS symptoms.
Noctrix Health, Inc.
Industry
Exploratory Study Assessing the Response of Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) Patients to Non-invasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS) During Opioid Medication Reduction
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07637643
Dyssomnias, Lumbar Central Spinal Stenosis
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT00949806
Dyssomnias, Mental Disorders
Pessac, France
View Trial DetailsNCT03218969
Augmentation, Dyssomnias
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07292077
Craniomandibular Disorders, Dyssomnias
Yozgat, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details