Cervical epidural steroid injection
ProcedureInterlaminar cervical epidural steroid injection with steroid and normal saline at C6-7 and C7-T1 (standard of care).
NCT Number: NCT04320836
Neck pain is the 4th leading cause of disability in the world, with approximately 50% being neuropathic in nature. Epidural steroid injections (ESI) are one of the most commonly used treatments for cervical radiculopathy. Physical exam signs, including non-organic signs, have been shown to predict outcomes for low back pain treatments, but have yet to be adequately studied for neck pain.
In this prospective, observational study, 72 patients with cervical radiculopathy undergoing an initial ESI for this pain episode will undergo a comprehensive history and physical examination that includes the presence of Spurling test, midline and paraspinal tenderness, 9 non-organic tests in 5 categories, and 3 questionnaires to assess depression, anxiety, sleep, and somatization. The investigators will also evaluate patients' MRI results to determine patients' precise pathology. Patients will then receive interlaminar cervical ESI. The primary outcome measure will be the difference in the proportion of people with a positive categorical outcome, defined as a >/= 2-point decrease in arm pain 4 weeks post-procedure coupled with a score >/= 5 on a 7-point patient global impression of change (PGIC) scale 4 weeks post-treatment, indicating subjective improvement.
The main objectives of this study are to:
1. Determine the ability of physical exam, including non-organic signs, to predict ESI outcomes in individuals with cervical radicular pain. 2. Determine the prevalence of different non-organic signs, and the association with other factors that may be associated with non-organic illness such as psychopathology and multiple unrelated pain conditions.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–90 year
All sexes
Observational
Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
Seventy-two patients with cervical radiculopathy undergoing an initial ESI for this pain episode will undergo a comprehensive history and physical examination that includes the presence of Spurling test, midline and paraspinal tenderness, 9 non-organic tests in 5 categories, and 3 questionnaires to assess depression, anxiety, sleep, and somatization.
Non-organic signs that the investigators will evaluate are:
a. Inability to rotate head > 45 degrees during overt range-of-motion testing, but significantly greater range of motion when patient is lying prone and asked to turn head to respond to physician request (e.g. sign paper, count fingers, answer question).
The investigators will evaluate MRI results to determine the precise pathology. Patients will then receive interlaminar cervical ESI. In accordance with standard practice, a Tuohy needle will be directed towards the side of the radicular pain, with correct needle position in the epidural space being confirmed with real-time contrast injection. Once the physician is satisfied with the spread, a 3 mL solution consisting of depo-methylprednisolone 40 mg + 2 mL normal saline will be injected. At Seoul National University, due to Korean healthcare regulations, the mixture will be a 3 mL solution containing 10 mg of dexamethasone and 2 mL saline. The primary outcome measure will be the difference in the proportion of people with a positive categorical outcome, defined as a >/= 2-point decrease in average arm pain 4 weeks post-procedure coupled with a score >/= 5 on a 7-point patient global impression of change (PGIC) scale 4 weeks post-treatment, indicating subjective improvement. Secondary outcome measures will include mean reductions in average and worst 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) arm pain scores over the past 7 days, mean reduction in average and worst neck pain scores, neck disability index (NDI) score, medication usage, patient global impression of change (PGIC), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), Somatic Symptom Scale-8 (SSS-8), and side effects. Individuals who experience a positive categorical outcome at 4 weeks will continue to be evaluated at 12 weeks, while those with a negative outcome will exit the study.
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Interlaminar cervical epidural steroid injection with steroid and normal saline at C6-7 and C7-T1 (standard of care).
Time frame: 4 weeks
Positive response is defined as a >/= 2-point reduction in average arm pain coupled with >/= 5/7 score on patient global impression of change. Anything else is a negative response.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Average arm pain on 0-10 numerical rating scale.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Worst arm pain on 0-10 numerical rating scale.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Average neck pain on 0-10 numerical rating scale.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Worst neck pain on 0-10 numerical rating scale.
Time frame: 4 weeks
NDI Score on 0-10 numerical rating scale.
Time frame: 4 weeks
8-question survey, out of 32 points measuring somatization.
Time frame: 4 weeks
8-question survey, out of 24 points measuring sleep quality.
Time frame: 4 weeks
14-question survey measuring anxiety and depression (each out of 21 points).
Time frame: 4 weeks
7-point Likert scale measuring patient-reported improvement.
Time frame: 12 weeks
7-point Likert scale measuring patient-reported improvement.
Time frame: 12 weeks
14-question survey measuring anxiety and depression (each out of 21 points).
Time frame: 12 weeks
8-question survey, out of 24 points measuring sleep quality.
Time frame: 12 weeks
8-question survey, out of 32 points measuring somatization.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Average arm pain on 0-10 numerical rating scale.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Worst arm pain on 0-10 numerical rating scale.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Average neck pain on 0-10 numerical rating scale.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Worst neck pain on 0-10 numerical rating scale.
Time frame: 12 weeks
NDI Score on 0-10 numerical rating scale.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Positive response is a >/= 2-point reduction in average arm pain coupled with >/= 5/7 score on patient. Anything else is a negative response.
Johns Hopkins University
Other
Prospective Study to Determine Evaluate the Validity and Predictive Ability of Physical Exam Signs for Cervical Radiculopathy to Predict Epidural Steroid Injection (ESI) Treatment Outcomes.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07639671
Cervical Disc Herniation, Cervical Radicular Pain
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07375823
Cervical Radicular Pain, Cervical Radiculopathy
Lefka, Cyprus
View Trial DetailsNCT06069362
Cervical Pain, Cervical Radicular Pain
San Sebastián, Gipuzkoa, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07592715
Cervical Radicular Pain, Cervical Radiculopathy
Gujranwala, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial Details