Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01972360

Non-isotope Based Imaging Modalities vs Technetium-99m Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography(99mTcSPECT)

SPECT is currently the dominant clinical test for diagnostic and prognostic purposes as well as therapeutic decision-making. Given the shortage of nuclear reactor-produced Tc, advancing the use of non-isotope based imaging modalities has the potential to change the standard of care for patients with CAD as each one of these technics (CMR, CT, Stress echocardiography) has its own distinct potential advantages over SPECT.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–87 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Montreal Heart Institute

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

About this study

Obtain a better understanding of the clinical utility of advanced non-isotope-based imaging modalities to detect relevant CAD as potential alternatives to SPECT. Approximately 450 subjects will be enrolled in total. Three groups of about 150 patients per group. Each group will undergo imaging with 2 modalities; Group 1: 99mTcSPECT plus CMR, Group 2: 99mTcSPECT plus CT, Group 3:99mTcSPECT plus stress echocardiography. All 450 patients will undergo standard invasive coronary angiography following completion of non-invasive imaging, except for patients in whom both nuclear and non-nuclear imaging modalities reveal a normal result confirming the absence of significant coronary artery disease (i.e invasive angiography would not be clinically indicated and FFR would be considered to be above 0.8). Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infraction (TIMI) flow will be measured in all patients undergoing angiography, and fractional flow reserve (FFR) will be measured in all patients except those with TIMI flow =0, 1 and 2. All imaging procedures must be completed within 6 weeks. All patients will have a follow-up visit at 6 months after enrollment. During the 6 month follow-up visit major adverse cardiovascular events will be collected and adjudicated by a clinical endpoint committee (CEC).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • clinically indicated request for SPECT
  • ability to undergo at least one of three non-nuclear imaging tests; CMR, CT or Stress Echocardiography
  • History of recent symptoms suggestive of myocardial ischemia
  • High risk for ischemic cardiovascular events

Exclusion criteria

  • severely reduced systolic function (LV ejection fraction less than 35%)
  • Recent (less than 3 days) acute coronary syndrome including acute myocardial infarction
  • contraindications to dipyridamole SPECT including : i)severe reactive airway disease; ii) less than 3 days post Myocardial Infarction - Acute Coronary Syndrome (MI-ACS); iii) high-grade Atrioventricular block (AV block); iv)allergy to dipyridamole or theophylline; v) caffeine within 12 hours; vi) theophylline use within 48 hours; vii) severe claustrophobia; or viii) women who may be pregnant
  • kidney dysfunction (i.e estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) less than 45)
  • use of investigational drug or device within 30 days of screening visit
  • Coronary Artery Bypass Graft(s) surgery (CABG)

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall accuracy of "significant coronary artery disease (CAD)" according to non-invasive imaging modality

    Time frame: baseline

    The overall accuracy is calculated as the probability that a subject is correctly classified (presence of significant CAD or not) by non-invasive imaging modality. The standard of truth is presence of significant CAD or not according to the invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR)

  2. Sensitivity of "significant CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality

    Time frame: baseline

    The sensitivity is calculated as the probability that a subject with presence of significant CAD according to FFR is correctly identified as such by non-invasive imaging modality

  3. Specificity of "significant CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality

    Time frame: baseline

    The specificity is calculated as the probability that a subject with absence of significant CAD according to FFR is correctly identified as such by non-invasive imaging modality

  4. Positive predictive value of "significant CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality

    Time frame: baseline

    The positive predictive value is calculated as the probability that a subject with presence of significant CAD according to non-invasive imaging modality truly have significant CAD according to FFR

  5. Negative predictive value of "significant CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality

    Time frame: Baseline

    The negative predictive value is calculated as the probability that a subject with absence of significant CAD according to non-invasive imaging modality truly does not have significant CAD according to FFR

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall accuracy of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality flow and FFR

    Time frame: baseline

  2. Sensitivity of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality flow and FFR

    Time frame: Baseline

Other outcomes

  1. Specificity of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality flow and FFR

    Time frame: baseline

  2. Positive predictive value of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality flow and FFR

    Time frame: baseline

  3. Negative predictive value of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality flow and FFR

    Time frame: baseline

  4. Overall accuracy of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality to predict occurrence of the composite clinical endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)

    Time frame: baseline

  5. Sensitivity of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality to predict occurrence of the composite clinical endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)

    Time frame: baseline

  6. Specificity of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality to predict occurrence of the composite clinical endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)

    Time frame: baseline

  7. Positive predictive value of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality to predict occurrence of the composite clinical endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)

    Time frame: baseline

  8. Negative predictive value of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality to predict occurrence of the composite clinical endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)

    Time frame: baseline

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Montreal Heart Institute

Other

Collaborators

  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

Registry information

Official study title

Non-isotope Based Imaging Modalities vs 99mTcSPECT to Detect Myocardial Ischemia in Patients at High Risk for Ischemic Cardiovascular Events

Acronym: MITNECB5

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2019
First posted
Oct 30, 2013
Registry last updated
Feb 21, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.