The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
NCT Number: NCT06288217
This is a single-center, multiphase pilot study of 16 subjects with residual upper extremity deficits at least six months after a supratentorial ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the clinical safety, device functionality, and treatment effect of non-invasive electrical stimulation of the trigeminal and/or vagus nerves (nTVNS) using the NeuraStasis Stimulator System adjunctive to rehabilitation. Phase 1 consisted of 5 unblinded subjects receiving nTVNS to assess device usability and safety. Phase 2 used a Prospective Randomized Open, Blinded Endpoint (PROBE) design comparing nTVNS to sham stimulation in 11 subjects. The study will inform the design and implementation of a pivotal study.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me30 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
This pilot study proceeded in two phases: Phase I, an unblinded stage, and Phase II, a blinded stage comparing intervention and sham groups.
Phase I consisted of 5 subjects, unblinded, receiving nTVNS. This phase tested the usability of the device and de-risked the use of nTVNS during rehabilitation. Visits included consent and baseline evaluation, followed by 6 weeks of treatment consisting of upper extremity rehabilitation paired with nTVNS. Rehabilitation and treatment occurred at a cadence of 3 sessions per week. Primary endpoints was collected after 6 weeks.
Phase II consisted of a Prospective Randomized Open, Blinded Endpoint (PROBE) design with 11 subjects randomized to an intervention nTVNS group or a control sham stimulation group. Both groups received a stimulation tolerability assessment at the start of each session to support blinding for therapists and subjects. For the sham group, no stimulation was delivered during the priming or rehabilitation portions of the session. The same evaluations, sessions, and endpoints occurred as those in Phase 1.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Pulsed electrical stimulation of the trigeminal and vagus nerves paired with upper limb rehabilitation movements
Other names: nTVNS
Rehabilitation movements to improve upper limb function after stroke
Control sham stimulation of the trigeminal and vagus nerves is delivered at the start of each session. Performed alongside standard-of-care rehabilitation.
Time frame: Within 7 days of completing 6 weeks of rehabilitation
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) will be analyzed for the difference in average change after 6 weeks of therapy compared to baseline. The FMA-UE is a common scale used to measure motor impairment after a stroke. The range is 0 (more impairment) to 66 (no impairment).
Time frame: Within 7 days of completing 6 weeks of rehabilitation
The ARAT will be analyzed for the difference in average change after 6 weeks of therapy compared to baseline. The ARAT is a widely used clinical scoring tool for stroke rehabilitation. The test consists of 19 items that are grouped into four sub-tests: grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement. The total score on the ARAT ranges from 0 to 57, with a higher score indicating better performance.
Time frame: Within 7 days of completing 6 weeks of rehabilitation
The FMA-UE will be analyzed for the % of subjects that responded to treatment defined as achieving an effect equivalent to a greater than the minimal clinically important difference.
Time frame: Upon completion of 6 weeks of rehabilitation
Proportion of subjects completing all pre-specified treatment sessions across the 6 weeks of rehabilitation
Time frame: Upon completion of 6 weeks of rehabilitation
A questionnaire that evaluates subjects' level of comfort during use of the device on a 5-point scale, with 5 being the most comfortable and 1 being the least comfortable.
Time frame: Upon completion of 6 weeks of rehabilitation
A questionnaire that evaluates the ease of use of the device by therapists during the administration of rehab with the device on a 5-point scale, with 5 being the most usable and 1 being the least usable.
Time frame: Up to 24 hours after each therapy session and ending 24 hours post-last therapy session at 6 weeks of rehabilitation
SADE rate at 24 hours post-therapy sessions
Time frame: Within 7 days of completing 6 weeks of rehabilitation
The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) is a multidimensional self-reported measure of health-related quality of life. The SIS includes 59 items and assesses 8 domains: strength (four items), memory and thinking (seven items), emotion (nine items), communication (seven items), activities of daily living (ten items), mobility (nine items), hand function (five items) and participation and function in life activities (ten items). Each item is rated using a 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = an inability to complete the item; 5 = no difficulty experienced at all) and a global score is calculated as a summative score of each domain, transformed into a 0-100 scale. It includes an extra question on the person´s perceived stroke recovery measured in the form of a visual analogue scale from 0-100. Individual domain scores and the summative score will be analyzed for the difference in average change after 6 weeks of therapy compared to baseline.
Time frame: Collected at each therapy session across 6 weeks of rehabilitation
The number of paired stimulations initiated each rehabilitation session will be analyzed to understand personalized effectiveness and responder likelihood.
Time frame: Within 7 days of completing 6 weeks of rehabilitation
The Communicative Effectiveness Index (CETI) is a rating scale that measures change in functional communication in adults with aphasia. It assesses functionality across 16 communication situations rated by someone who interacts with the subject. The CETI score will be analyzed for the difference in average change after 6 weeks of therapy compared to baseline. Collected for subjects with aphasia only.
NeuraStasis, Inc
Industry
Feasibility of Trigeminal and Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Subjects With Chronic Upper Extremity Deficits After Stroke
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00719433
Brain Diseases, Bronchial Diseases
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT04992910
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Córdoba, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT06752499
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT03574623
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial Details