Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06288217

Non-invasive Trigeminal and Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Stroke Subjects With Chronic Upper Extremity Deficits

This is a single-center, multiphase pilot study of 16 subjects with residual upper extremity deficits at least six months after a supratentorial ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the clinical safety, device functionality, and treatment effect of non-invasive electrical stimulation of the trigeminal and/or vagus nerves (nTVNS) using the NeuraStasis Stimulator System adjunctive to rehabilitation. Phase 1 consisted of 5 unblinded subjects receiving nTVNS to assess device usability and safety. Phase 2 used a Prospective Randomized Open, Blinded Endpoint (PROBE) design comparing nTVNS to sham stimulation in 11 subjects. The study will inform the design and implementation of a pivotal study.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

This pilot study proceeded in two phases: Phase I, an unblinded stage, and Phase II, a blinded stage comparing intervention and sham groups.

Phase I consisted of 5 subjects, unblinded, receiving nTVNS. This phase tested the usability of the device and de-risked the use of nTVNS during rehabilitation. Visits included consent and baseline evaluation, followed by 6 weeks of treatment consisting of upper extremity rehabilitation paired with nTVNS. Rehabilitation and treatment occurred at a cadence of 3 sessions per week. Primary endpoints was collected after 6 weeks.

Phase II consisted of a Prospective Randomized Open, Blinded Endpoint (PROBE) design with 11 subjects randomized to an intervention nTVNS group or a control sham stimulation group. Both groups received a stimulation tolerability assessment at the start of each session to support blinding for therapists and subjects. For the sham group, no stimulation was delivered during the priming or rehabilitation portions of the session. The same evaluations, sessions, and endpoints occurred as those in Phase 1.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • History of unilateral supratentorial ischemic, intracerebral hemorrhagic, subarachnoid hemorrhagic, or a heterogeneous lesion stroke that occurred at least 6 months but not more than 15 years prior to enrollment.
  • Age >30 years and <85 years.
  • Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) baseline score of 10 to 56 (inclusive of 10 and 56).
  • Ability to communicate, understand, and provide appropriate consent. Subjects should be able to follow two-step commands.
  • Right- or left-sided weakness of the upper extremity.

Exclusion criteria

  • Participant with any implanted metallic device at or near the stimulation sites (forehead and ears).
  • Participant with an implanted or active stimulator (ex. Deep brain stimulator, pacemaker, vagus nerve stimulator, defibrillator)
  • Participant skin in the stimulation area has open wounds, skin eruptions, swollen, infected, or inflamed areas, or skin abnormalities that could be cancerous
  • Advanced cardiac, pulmonary, liver, kidney dysfunction or blood system disease
  • Participant has a fever or shows clinical signs concerning for an infectious disease
  • Other neurologic or musculoskeletal diseases that could interfere with the assessments of this study
  • Low heart rate (<60 bpm) from a cardiac conduction block or related etiology
  • Participant has a history of trigeminal neuralgia
  • Participant has a history of Bell's Palsy
  • History of cranial nerve neuropathy (including facial nerve injury), carotid surgery, vagotomy, or other surgical intervention on the vagus nerve
  • History of recurrent syncopal events
  • Known or newly-discovered aneurysm or arteriovenous malformation
  • Patients who have any terminal illness such that the patient would not be expected to survive more than 90 days
  • Botox injections 12 weeks prior to or during therapy
  • Participants who have had a craniectomy:
  • Without replacement of bone flap
  • With bone flap replaced < 6 months prior to initiation of study activities

Treatment and study plan

NeuraStasis Stimulator System (Non-Invasive Trigeminal and Vagus Nerve Stimulation)

Device

Pulsed electrical stimulation of the trigeminal and vagus nerves paired with upper limb rehabilitation movements

Other names: nTVNS

Upper Limb Rehabilitation

Other

Rehabilitation movements to improve upper limb function after stroke

Sham stimulation

Other

Control sham stimulation of the trigeminal and vagus nerves is delivered at the start of each session. Performed alongside standard-of-care rehabilitation.

Primary outcomes

  1. Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) Average Change

    Time frame: Within 7 days of completing 6 weeks of rehabilitation

    The Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) will be analyzed for the difference in average change after 6 weeks of therapy compared to baseline. The FMA-UE is a common scale used to measure motor impairment after a stroke. The range is 0 (more impairment) to 66 (no impairment).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) Average Change

    Time frame: Within 7 days of completing 6 weeks of rehabilitation

    The ARAT will be analyzed for the difference in average change after 6 weeks of therapy compared to baseline. The ARAT is a widely used clinical scoring tool for stroke rehabilitation. The test consists of 19 items that are grouped into four sub-tests: grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement. The total score on the ARAT ranges from 0 to 57, with a higher score indicating better performance.

  2. Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) Response %

    Time frame: Within 7 days of completing 6 weeks of rehabilitation

    The FMA-UE will be analyzed for the % of subjects that responded to treatment defined as achieving an effect equivalent to a greater than the minimal clinically important difference.

  3. Proportion of subjects completing all pre-specified treatment doses

    Time frame: Upon completion of 6 weeks of rehabilitation

    Proportion of subjects completing all pre-specified treatment sessions across the 6 weeks of rehabilitation

  4. Subject Questionnaire on Device Usage

    Time frame: Upon completion of 6 weeks of rehabilitation

    A questionnaire that evaluates subjects' level of comfort during use of the device on a 5-point scale, with 5 being the most comfortable and 1 being the least comfortable.

  5. Therapist Questionnaire on Device Usage

    Time frame: Upon completion of 6 weeks of rehabilitation

    A questionnaire that evaluates the ease of use of the device by therapists during the administration of rehab with the device on a 5-point scale, with 5 being the most usable and 1 being the least usable.

  6. Serious adverse device effects (SADE) rate at 24 hours post-therapy session

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours after each therapy session and ending 24 hours post-last therapy session at 6 weeks of rehabilitation

    SADE rate at 24 hours post-therapy sessions

  7. Stroke impact scale (SIS) Domain and Summative Score Average Change

    Time frame: Within 7 days of completing 6 weeks of rehabilitation

    The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) is a multidimensional self-reported measure of health-related quality of life. The SIS includes 59 items and assesses 8 domains: strength (four items), memory and thinking (seven items), emotion (nine items), communication (seven items), activities of daily living (ten items), mobility (nine items), hand function (five items) and participation and function in life activities (ten items). Each item is rated using a 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = an inability to complete the item; 5 = no difficulty experienced at all) and a global score is calculated as a summative score of each domain, transformed into a 0-100 scale. It includes an extra question on the person´s perceived stroke recovery measured in the form of a visual analogue scale from 0-100. Individual domain scores and the summative score will be analyzed for the difference in average change after 6 weeks of therapy compared to baseline.

  8. Analysis of the number of stimulations per therapy session

    Time frame: Collected at each therapy session across 6 weeks of rehabilitation

    The number of paired stimulations initiated each rehabilitation session will be analyzed to understand personalized effectiveness and responder likelihood.

Other outcomes

  1. Change in Communicative Effectiveness Index (CETI) Score

    Time frame: Within 7 days of completing 6 weeks of rehabilitation

    The Communicative Effectiveness Index (CETI) is a rating scale that measures change in functional communication in adults with aphasia. It assesses functionality across 16 communication situations rated by someone who interacts with the subject. The CETI score will be analyzed for the difference in average change after 6 weeks of therapy compared to baseline. Collected for subjects with aphasia only.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

NeuraStasis, Inc

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Feasibility of Trigeminal and Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Subjects With Chronic Upper Extremity Deficits After Stroke

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Mar 1, 2024
Registry last updated
Jun 2, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.