Rogers Behavioral Health
Oconomowoc, Wisconsin, 53066, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Hana Zickgraf, Ph.D., M.A., B.A.
CONTACT
Hana Zickgraf, Ph.D., M.A., B.A.
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT07017322
The study is to evaluate the feasibility of using a non-invasive brain stimulation device in a sample of inpatients with eating disorders (ED). The study will help researchers evaluate whether their device protocol is practical for eating disorder inpatients as a way to manage eating disorder and anxiety symptoms. A secondary aim of the study is to evaluate preliminary effectiveness of the protocol for reducing pre-meal anxiety during the treatment, and explore effects on eating disorder symptoms over the course of the inpatient admission.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–30 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Oconomowoc, Wisconsin, 53066, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Hana Zickgraf, Ph.D., M.A., B.A.
CONTACT
Hana Zickgraf, Ph.D., M.A., B.A.
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a protocol for using Alpha-Stim AID® (explicitly references the patented waveform and delivery method in the Alpha-Stim AID® device manufactured and marketed by Electromedical Products International, Mineral Wells, TX) to manage acute pre-meal anxiety in eating disorder inpatients indicated by recruitment and retention, dropout reasoning, nature and frequency of patient-reported side effects, level of missing patient-reported data, staff perception and patient perception. Secondary outcomes include pre-meal anxiety rated on a 0-10 visual analogue scale, eating disorder symptom severity during the three-session protocol and across the inpatient admission using the Eating Disorder-15 assessment, and clinical impairment from disordered eating using the Clinical Impairment Assessment-Eating only version, across the same timepoints.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Subjects will receive non-invasive cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) treatment in 20-minute group sessions taking place immediately prior to breakfast, lunch, and dinner. This study uses the Alpha-Stim AID® CES device which will be set to the highest amplitude that is tolerated by the participant (with a minimum of 200 microampere (µA) and a maximum of 500 µA stimulation) at 0.5 hertz for a duration of 20 minutes per session, 3 sessions per day, for 3 separate days of stimulation (180 minutes of stimulation total).
Time frame: From recruitment to end of study intervention at day 3.
The percentage of eligible patients approached for recruitment, percentage of recruited patients enrolled, and percentage of enrolled patients completing the study, each as recorded by study staff.
Time frame: Anytime from enrollment to the end of study intervention at day 3.
The patient's self-reported rationale for leaving the study prematurely (e.g., unexpected discharge from inpatient eating disorder treatment, unable to tolerate stimulation, emergent suicidality, unwilling to participate in the protocol, etc.).
Time frame: Before the first session on days 2 and 3 of the study intervention.
Patient-reported side effects questionnaire assessing side effects experienced from the intervention day prior.
Time frame: Baseline, Days 2 and 3 of study intervention.
The Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire is a 6-item self-report survey used to assess patients' belief and expectation that they will benefit from a treatment. We will use two questions from the scale to assess how much the participant believes the treatment makes sense, and how strongly they feel it will help them. It is rated on a 10-point scale with anchors 1-9 (not at all (1), somewhat (5), very (9)).
The two questions from the CEQ will be as follows:
Time frame: At end of patient's participation and end of admission on inpatient unit.
Tracking and reporting completeness of all patient-reported outcome data and study data abstracted from electronic medical records.
Time frame: Prior to each meal on intervention days 1, 2 and 3.
A patient-reported measure of pre-meal anxiety rated on a 0-10 visual analogue scale. A score of 0 is no anxiety while a score of 10 is maximum anxiety.
Time frame: From enrollment until end of study intervention on day 3.
Patient self-reports of eating disorder symptoms using the Eating Disorder-15 (ED-15) measure. The ED-15 includes two attitudinal subscales, scored as follows: 1) Weight & Shape Concerns = mean of items 2, 4, 5, 6, 9, and 10 (add the six scores and divide by 6), 2) Eating Concerns = mean of items 1, 3, 7 and 8 (add the four scores and - divide by 4). The Overall attitudinal score is the mean of the scores on all ten items (total the ten items and divide by 10). All items are positively scored from 0-6.
Time frame: At days 1, 2 and 3 of intervention.
The Fear of Food Measure (FOFM) is a measure of the degree to which patients report fearing eating and food itself. Scores on the FOFM can assess if patients are improving while undergoing eating disorder treatment. The FOFM is a 23 item scale positively scored 0-5 with three attitudinal scales measuring Anxiety About Eating, Food Anxiety Behaviors (i.e., avoidance), and Feared Concerns (i.e., feared outcomes of eating). Scores on all subscales will be examined, but Food Anxiety Behaviors scores are the most directly comparable across eating disorder diagnoses (e.g., Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) vs. anorexia and bulimia nervosa, Other Specified Feeding or Eating Disorders (OSFED)).
Time frame: Days 1, 2 and 3 of intervention.
The Clinical Impairment Assessment - Eating only (CIA) is a 16-item measure of physical, cognitive, and emotional impairment from disordered eating. Items are scored on a 0-4 scale. The Eating-only version of the measure assesses impairment specifically related to restrictive or binge eating behavior, rather than impairment from other eating disorder behaviors that are not universally applicable to all eating disorders (i.e., purging, compensatory exercise). The measure is scored by summing all items for a possible score of 0-64.
Time frame: Inpatient admission to discharge (average 14 days)
Frequency of use of mealtime interventions for anxiety. This is a study-specific measure created by summing the meals during which one or more acute anxiety interventions (acute anxiolytics, one-to-one support, reduced meal plan, or tube feeding) were used across the full inpatient stay. Obtained from the electronic medical record.
Time frame: Inpatient admission to discharge (average 14 days).
The outcome is time to discharge to a lower level of eating disorder care. This analysis will exclude data from any patient discharged for medical reasons, to another inpatient program, or against medical advice. Obtained from the electronic medical record.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Rogers Behavioral Health
Other
Investigating Non-invasive Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation for Acute Anxiety in Inpatients With Eating Disorders
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07600671
Anorexia Nervosa, Binge Eating Disorder
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07237607
Anorexia Nervosa, Binge-Eating Disorder
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06208605
Anorexia Nervosa, Binge-Eating Disorder
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06752304
Anorexia Nervosa, Binge Eating Disorder
Uppsala, Sweden
View Trial Details