James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY
The Bronx, New York, 10468, United States
NCT Number: NCT03414424
Most spinal cord injuries (SCI) are anatomically incomplete - some nerve circuits remain intact, even if the individual cannot feel or control them. Activating spared nerve circuits may improve functional recovery.
With this goal, the Investigators have developed a form of electrical stimulation over the cervical spinal cord that can activate muscles in both hands simultaneously and comfortably. This technique, called cervical electrical stimulation (CES), works at the skin surface - no surgery or other invasive procedures are required.
The long-term goal is to use CES to strengthen residual circuits to hand muscles after SCI. Regaining control over hand function represents the top priority for individuals with cervical SCI.
In the current study, the Investigators first need to better understand how CES works. In the first half of this study, the Investigators will take a systematic approach to determining how CES interacts with other circuits in the spinal cord and the brain. In the second half of the study, the Investigators will test combinations of CES with active hand and wrist movements to find ways to enhance physical movement with CES.
These experiments will improve understanding of electrical stimulation in SCI, and may set the table for future treatments to prolong any short-term benefits observed in this study.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
The Bronx, New York, 10468, United States
Roughly 60% of spinal cord injuries occur at the cervical level. Most injuries are anatomically incomplete. Activating spared nerve circuits augments functional recovery of the damaged nervous system. With this goal, the Investigators have developed a novel method of non-invasive cervical electrical stimulation (CES). Preliminary data show that CES triggers afferent sensory or efferent motor nerve roots depending on stimulus intensity, resulting in concurrent activation of multiple muscles on both upper limbs. the Investigators aim to use CES to strengthen residual circuits to hand muscles after SCI. Regaining control over hand function represents the top priority for individuals with cervical SCI.
However, much more work needs to be done to better understand underlying CES mechanisms, its interactions with segmental and supraspinal circuits, and its optimal stimulation parameters for improving neural transmission to the hands. This proposal will address these issues.
Mechanistic experiments: 15 able-bodied volunteers and 15 subjects with motor-incomplete cervical spinal cord injury will undergo systematic combinations of CES with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or peripheral nerve stimuli at varying intensities, sites, and interstimulus intervals.
Mechanistic hypotheses: Conditioning subthreshold CES pulses will potentiate responses to test pulses of TMS and peripheral nerve F-wave stimulation, will reduce responses to test pulses of peripheral nerve H-reflex stimulation, and will modulate response to test suprathreshold CES pulses in either direction depending on conditioning stimulus interval and intensity. These experiments will elucidate CES circuit interactions at both the segmental and supraspinal levels.
Combined CES-volitional movement experiments: 15 able-bodied volunteers and 15 subjects with motor-incomplete cervical spinal cord injury will undergo systematic combinations of CES with volitional wrist and hand movements at varying intensity and effort level.
Combined CES-volitional movement hypotheses: Conditioning subthreshold CES pulses will facilitate concurrent volitional wrist and hand muscle activation. Suprathreshold CES will transiently inhibit concurrent volitional wrist and hand muscle activation. These experiments will shed light on the clinically relevant possibility of using CES to enhance response to physical exercise therapy.
Completion of the proposed studies will characterize CES circuit timing and distribution, and will demonstrate in principle the potential for CES to enhance physical therapy for wrist and hand muscles. Furthermore, this approach is compatible with other interventions, including drug and cell-based treatments.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
CES will be delivered at rest at various intensities, in combination with either electrical stimulation over peripheral nerves or magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex.
This is an experiment designed to measure CES interactions with other central and peripheral nerve circuits.
CES will be delivered while the participant performs specific finger or wrist tasks at different degrees of effort.
This is an experiment designed to detect momentary changes in muscle function.
Time frame: up to one day
Effect of cervical electrical stimulation (CES) on concurrent finger or wrist active movements will be measured via root-mean-square of ongoing muscle activity in various hand and forearm muscles.
Time frame: up to one day
Response of the target hand muscle to transcranial magnetic stimulation (delivered at 120% of resting motor threshold) with or without a conditioning cervical electrical stimulator pulse (delivered at 90% of resting motor threshold) timed to arrive at cervical synapses 2 milliseconds after transcranial pulse arrival. Response is expressed as percentage change relative to the response to unconditioned transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Bronx VA Medical Center
Fed
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05589402
Bone Diseases, Brain Diseases
Harlingen, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04350359
Central Nervous System Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05822297
Central Nervous System Diseases, Cognition Disorders
Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT04736849
Central Nervous System Diseases, Nervous System Diseases
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial Details