University Hospital Basel
Basel, 4031, Switzerland
NCT Number: NCT01079611
Background: Estimates of central venous pressure (CVP) can be very helpful in guiding fluid therapy in the intensive care unit, operating room or emergency room. Current standard technique for CVP assessment is invasive, requiring insertion of a catheter into a subclavian, internal jugular or peripheral vein. Several ultrasound based and clinical methods have been described as potential non-invasive alternatives to assess CVP.
Aim: To prospectively evaluate the accuracy of CVP assessment by a) inferior vena cava diameter and collapsibility b) internal jugular vein diameter c) compression sonography of a forearm vein and d) clinical assessment of peripheral vein collapse in comparison to invasive CVP measurement.
Study design: single center, prospective observational study
Patients and Methods:
We will examine 77 consecutive patients with invasive venous access and invasive hemodynamic monitoring at the surgical intensive care unit (ICU). After obtaining informed consent, ultrasound examinations of the inferior vena cava, internal jugular vein and compression sonography of a forearm vein as well as clinical evaluation of peripheral vein collapsibility will be performed in a random sequence by different experienced examiner. Invasive CVP is recorded simultaneously to each measurement. Examiners are blinded to clinical parameters and results of previous CVP measurements.
Primary endpoint: Accuracy of each non-invasive method to determine CVP defined by invasively measured CVP.
Secondary endpoint: Comparison of the feasibility of each non-invasive method.
Expected results: We hypothesize that sonographic measurement of inferior vena cava diameter, internal jugular vein diameter and compression sonography of a forearm vein as well as clinical assessment of peripheral vein collapsibility are reliable methods for CVP determination in comparison to invasive CVP measurement.
Significance: The validation and comparison of sonographic / clinic CVP assessment would enable clinicians to choose an accurate non-invasive method to assess volume status which is an important adjunct in the management of many critically ill patients. The non-invasiveness of these methods broadens the feasibility to measure CVP and may guide fluid therapy in new patient populations.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Basel, 4031, Switzerland
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Other
Non-invasive Assessments of Central Venous Pressure by Ultrasound and Clinical Examination: a Prospective Comparative Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02820207
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Brain Diseases
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT02449863
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Infant, Newborn, Diseases
Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07656181
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound, Liver
Bern, Canton of Bern, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT07453186
Bariatric Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery, Biliary Tract Diseases
Esbjerg, Denmark
View Trial Details