Emergency department Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière
Paris, 75013, France
NCT Number: NCT04653597
A decreased level of consciousness is a common reason for presentation to the emergency department (ED) and is often the result of intoxication (up to 1% of all ED visits and 3% of ICU admission). In France, approximately 165 000 poisoned patients are managed each year. Originally developed in head injured patients, the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is a validated reproducible score evaluating the level of consciousness: a GCS ≤ 8 is strongly associated with reduced gag reflex and increased incidence of aspiration pneumonia. Although recommended for patients with traumatic brain injury and coma, it remains unknown whether the benefit of an invasive management of airways with sedation, intubation and mechanical ventilation should be applied to other causes of coma in particular for acute poisoned patients. The investigator hypothesize that a conservative management with close monitoring without immediate endotracheal intubation of these patients is effective and associated with less in-hospital complications (truncated at 28 days) compared to routine practice management (in which the decision of immediate intubation is left to the discretion of the emergency physician).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Paris, 75013, France
A decreased level of consciousness is a common reason for presentation to the emergency department (ED) and is often the result of intoxication (up to 1% of all ED visits and 3% of intensive care unit (ICU) admission). In France, approximately 165 000 poisoned patients are managed each year.1 Originally developed in head injured patients, the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is a validated reproducible score evaluating the level of consciousness - a GCS ≤ 8 is associated with reduced gag reflex and increased incidence of aspiration pneumonia (with an adjusted odds ratio of 2.32, 95%CI =1.60 to 3.33). However, whether this risk of aspiration pneumonia (AP) may be decreased by early intubation is unknown, and no difference in the risk of AP was reported between patients that were intubated early and patients who were not.
Although it is well established that in trauma patients, a GCS ≤ 8 mandates airway management by endotracheal intubation, it remains unknown whether this strategy should be applied to other etiologies of coma, in particular for acute poisoned patients. Tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation allow to prevent aspiration pneumonia, to optimize oxygenation and gas exchange.
Investigators will include patients with a decreased level of consciousness (defined by a GCS of 8 or less) caused by acute intoxication (alcohol, recreative drugs, or other prescription drugs (with the exception intoxication with cardiotropic drugs, e.g. beta blockers, calcium channel inhibitor, angiotensin conversion enzyme)). These patients will be included at the initial stage of their management: in the ED, or out of hospital with a pre-hospital emergency physician. Patients with clear proven benefit of intubation will be excluded : patients in shock, patients with suspicion of brain lesion, seizure related with poisoning, visualization of regurgitation of gastric content or sign of respiratory distress. Conservative airway management. Patients will be conservatively managed, i.e. close monitoring and no intubation and mechanical ventilation unless the patient presents a clinical event that needs intubation (shock, sign of respiratory distress, visualization of regurgitation or seizure).
Acute poisoning is a common reason for presentation to the ED or MICU intervention (up to 1% of all ED visits and 3% of intensive care unit (ICU) admission). These patients are often intubated (reported rate ranging from 20 to 50% in different cohort studies), when their GCS is below 8, in order to protect their airways. However there is currently no clear demonstration of its efficacy in this specific target population, while it is known that intubation is associated with morbidity and mortality.
Intubated patients need subsequent intensive care unit admission and invasive monitoring, and this can be associated with increased risk of pulmonary complications, length of hospital-stay, nosocomial infections and cost. In a context of expenditures control in health care, appropriate intensive care resource utilization is an important issue. When considering the increasing demand for intensive care among emergency patients, the importance of health care resource allocation and expenditure control, and the possible absence benefit of intubation and intensive care, an endotracheal airway management of poisoned coma patients might be detrimental.
Thus, if our hypothesis is demonstrated, the results of NICO study will change practice and guidelines for management of acute coma poisoned patients, with less exposure to the morbidity of endotracheal intubation and associated with decrease of ICU stay, and reduction of their health costs.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
surveillance every 30 minutes of blood pressure, SpO2, respiratory rate, heart rate and GCS until the patient recovers a GCS>8 or responds adequately to a simple order
invasive airway management in order to avoid risk of pulmonary aspiration
Time frame: at 28 days
this endpoint will be reported using both the Finkelstein model (Finkelstein Stat med 1999; Beitler JAMA 2019) and the win ratio methods (Pocok Eur H J 2016), with priority listed in this order from highest to lowest. Patients will be followed until hospital discharge (or truncated at 28 days if still hospitalized) and data collected in the electronic health record the investigator with the help of a clinical research technician.
Time frame: at 28 days
this endpoint will be reported using both the Finkelstein model (Finkelstein Stat med 1999; Beitler JAMA 2019) and the win ratio methods (Pocok Eur H J 2016), with priority listed in this order from highest to lowest. Patients will be followed until hospital discharge (or truncated at 28 days if still hospitalized) and data collected in the electronic health record the investigator with the help of a clinical research technician.
Time frame: at 28 days
this endpoint will be reported using both the Finkelstein model (Finkelstein Stat med 1999; Beitler JAMA 2019) and the win ratio methods (Pocok Eur H J 2016), with priority listed in this order from highest to lowest. Patients will be followed until hospital discharge (or truncated at 28 days if still hospitalized) and data collected in the electronic health record the investigator with the help of a clinical research technician.
Time frame: at 28 days
number of included patients dead at 28 days after randomisation
Time frame: at 28 days
number of day in ICU for each patient included since randomization
Time frame: at 28 days
number of day in hospitalization for each patient included since their randomization
Time frame: at 28 days
number of patient included with mechanical ventilation 28 days after randomization
Time frame: at 28 days
Time frame: 28 days
number of patient included admitted to ICU during hospital stay
Time frame: 28 days
number of patient included developing a rapid onset pneumonia during hospital stay
Time frame: 28 days
number of patient included developing an adverse events from intubation during hospital stay, and type of adverse events
Time frame: at 28 days
cost of hospitalization for patient included in the study.
Time frame: at 28 days
cost of hospitalization for patient included in the study.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Other
Acronym: NICO
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05229419
Chemically-Induced Disorders, Poisoning
Asyut, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT01209455
Anaphylaxis, Chemically-Induced Disorders
Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT02553070
Chemically-Induced Disorders, Poisoning
Gainesville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00013767
Chemically-Induced Disorders, Poisoning
View Trial Details