NCT Number: NCT02860572
Non-interventional Follow-up Versus Fluid Bolus in RESPONSE to Oliguria in the Critically Ill
Background: After hypotension, oliguria (urine output less than 0.5 mL/kg/h) was the most common trigger to administer fluid bolus in a multinational practice survey in intensive care. The effect of fluid bolus on cardiovascular variables can be very short-lived among patients in shock suggesting that fluid boluses in the optimization phase are unlikely to improve patient-centered outcomes. Moreover, a growing body of evidence suggests a poor renal response to fluid bolus.
Objective: To investigate, whether fluid bolus - as a standard of care - improves urine output in oliguric patients compared to a non-interventional follow-up approach without fluid bolus.
Design: Investigator-initiated, open, randomized, controlled study
Interventions:
1. Intervention group - follow-up without intervention 2. Control group - fluid bolus (500mL of balanced crystalloid over 30 minutes)
Randomization: 1:1 stratified according to the site, presence of acute kidney injury, and sepsis
Trial size: 130 patients randomized in 2 ICUs
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year–100 year
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Primary location
Helsinki University Hospital, Meilahti, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland
About this study
Study hypothesis:
The investigators hypothesize that fluid bolus given due to oliguria does not improve urine output in a majority of patients, especially among those with acute kidney injury. Another study hypothesis is that patients receiving fluid bolus will have higher levels of endothelial damage biomarkers.
Intervention description:
Intervention group -follow-up without intervention; No intervention to increase the urine output within 2 hours will be done.
Standard group - Fluid bolus group: Patient will receive 500mL of balanced crystalloid intravenously over 30 minutes.
In both groups, if severe hemodynamic instability occurs, a rescue bolus of 500mL over 30 minutes may be given according to the decision of the treating clinician.
In both groups, all other ongoing infusions (nutrition and on-going clear fluids) will be held constant during the 2-hour period. Vasoactive medications, sedation, short-acting insulin, and other medications can be modified according the clinical need. No diuretics during the 2-hour study period are allowed. After two hours from randomization, treating clinician can modify the fluid and drug therapy according to the clinical needs of the patient. All administered fluids will be recorded 6 h from randomization.
Except for the study intervention period of 2 hours, no attempt to control fluid therapy will be done. During the study period, all other aspects of critical care will follow the ICU's standard operating procedures and clinician's prescription.
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Age over 18
- Emergency admission to an ICU
- Mean arterial pressure (MAP) >65 mmHg (with vasopressors if needed) and initial fluid resuscitation for shock/hypovolemia has been given
- Oliguria (urine output less than 0.5mL/kg/h) for at least 2 consecutive hours
Exclusion criteria
- Marked fluctuations in hemodynamics within last 2 hours (cardiac arrhythmias, increase in norepinephrine need over 0.2ug/kg/min, need for initiation of inotrope/inodilator)
- Administration of furosemide within last 6 hours
- Chronic kidney disease (estimated pre-critical illness GFR < 60ml/min/1.73m2)
- Renal replacement therapy
- Among patients with acute kidney injury, urgent indications for commencing renal replacement therapy
- Fluid overload (cumulative fluid accumulation exceeds 10% of baseline body weight)
- Pulmonary edema (bilateral infiltrates in chest x-ray)
- Active bleeding (need for transfusion, platelets, or fresh frozen plasma)
- Suspected or known intra-abdominal hypertension (IAP >16mmHg)
- Pregnant or lactating
- Expected survival less than 24h
- Obtaining informed consent is not possible/consent is denied
Treatment and study plan
Fluid bolus
OtherPrimary outcomes
-
Change in individual mean cumulative urine output (mL/kg/h)
Time frame: 2 hours after randomization compared to urine output 2 hours preceding randomization
Doubling of the urine output is defined as clinically meaningful response
Secondary outcomes
-
The difference between groups in the change in individual urine output
Time frame: 2 hours after randomization compared to urine output 2 hours preceding randomization
-
Duration of consecutive oliguria (urine output <0.5 mL/kg)
Time frame: during ICU stay, i.e. as long as urine output stays below 0.5 mL/kg/h while the patient is in the ICU (an average of 5 to 7 days) or until renal replacement therapy is commenced
-
Cumulative fluid balance
Time frame: six hours from randomization
Other outcomes
-
Number of patients receiving rescue boluses and the number of rescue boluses
Time frame: study intervention period (i.e. 2 hours)
-
Highest stage of acute kidney injury
Time frame: within 24 hours, 48 hours and during ICU stay (an average of 5 to 7 days or up to 30 days if patient is still in ICU)
-
Number of patients with one or several protocol violation(s) and number of those per patient
Time frame: study intervention period (i.e. 2 hours)
-
Number of patients with adverse events
Time frame: from randomization to next morning
-
Number of patients receiving renal replacement therapy
Time frame: during ICU stay(an average of 5 to 7 days or up to 30 days if patient is still in ICU)
-
change in mean arterial pressure
Time frame: from randomization to 2 hours post-randomization
-
change in heart rate
Time frame: from randomization to 2 hours post-randomization
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Other
Collaborators
- Central Finland Hospital District
Registry information
Official study title
Non-interventional Follow-up Versus Fluid Bolus in RESPONSE to Oliguria in the Optimization Phase of Fluid Therapy in the Critically Ill (the RESPONSE Trial)
Acronym: RESPONSE
Important dates
- Study start
- 2017
- Primary completion
- 2020
- Study completion
- 2020
- First posted
- Aug 9, 2016
- Registry last updated
- Dec 14, 2020
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Septic Patients
NCT05830669
Acute Kidney Injury, Critical Illness
Münster, Germany
View Trial DetailsBK Virus and Renal Dysfunction in Postoperative/Posttraumatic Critically Ill Patients
NCT00736827
Acute Kidney Injury, Acute Renal Failure
Ulm, Germany
View Trial DetailsActivated Vitamin D for the Prevention and Treatment of Acute Kidney Injury
NCT02962102
Acute Kidney Injury, Critical Illness
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNT-proBNP in ICU Postoperative/Posttraumatic Patients With Shock
NCT00736723
Critical Illness, Critically Ill
Ulm, Germany
View Trial Details