Non-hormonal vaginal device therapy
DeviceExperimental Active Therapy
NCT Number: NCT04887701
Randomized (1:1), double-blind, sham-controlled, 2-arm parallel study comparing effectiveness and safety of non-hormonal medical device versus sham device to treat VVA in post-menopausal women.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year–65 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
North Shore Private Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
After screening and baseline assessment, participants, ages 21 to 65 years of age, will be randomized and followed for a 12-week intervention period. After the primary endpoint evaluation at week 12, each participant in both arms will immediately commence an open label period using an Active device for week 13 to 1 year to collect further effectiveness and safety data.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Experimental Active Therapy
Sham Comparator
Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Will determine by comparing the mean change between the two arms of the study in clinician assessed changes of VVA by the Vaginal Health Index (VHI). The VHI gives a numerical score (1-5) for each of the 5 parameters measured:
issue elasticity, vaginal fluid, PH, mucosa, and vaginal moisture.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Mean change in the Vaginal Assessment Scale (VAS). The VAS is a scale from 0 to 3 with 0 being no symptoms and 3 being severe symptoms.
Time frame: 12 weeks
The proportion of patients in the two arms of the study achieving improvement in the patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I), (much or very much improved) at 12 weeks post-treatment.
Time frame: 1 year
Adverse event grading will be done according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (CTCAE)
Time frame: 6 months and 1 year
Patient satisfaction assessed on Likert Scale - a scoring from 0 to 3 (0=not satisfied, 1=neutral, 2=satisfied, 3=extremely satisfied)
Madorra
Industry
Clinical Outcomes and Safety of a Non-hormonal Medical Device Versus a Sham Device on the Treatment of Vulvovaginal Atrophy (VVA) in Post-Menopausal Women Who Have Failed, Refused, or Are Contraindicated for Hormone Therapy
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07250490
Dyspareunia, Female Urogenital Diseases
Lisbon, Lisbon District, Portugal
View Trial DetailsNCT04746456
Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause, Menopause
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06846216
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Mission Viejo, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05586711
Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause, Vulvovaginal Atrophy
Stockholm, Sweden
View Trial Details