Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04567160

NOL Index to Compare the Intraoperative Analgesic Effect of Propofol Versus Sevoflurane

The purpose of this prospective randomized controlled study is to compare the analgesic properties of propofol and sevoflurane using variation of the NOL index and standard monitoring (Heart Rate and Mean Arterial Blood Pressure) when patients under general anaesthesia with either agents are subjected to a standardized painful stimulus (a tetanic stimulation over the ulnar nerve at 70 mA, 100 Hz for 30 seconds).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

CIUSSS de l'Est de l'Ile de Montreal

Montreal, Quebec, H1T2M4, Canada

About this study

This study proposes a research design that compare the analgesic properties of two commonly used agents for induction and maintenance of the hypnotic component of anesthesia: propofol versus sevoflurane. Using the NOL index to quantitatively monitor nociception, it is expected to see a difference in response to a standardized electrical and tetanic stimulus during general anesthesia maintained with either agents.

Hypothesis is that magnitude of the variation and/or the value of the NOL Index following a standardized nociceptive stimulus is lower when general anesthesia is based on propofol rather than on sevoflurane.

Induction of general anesthesia will differ depending in which group the patient belongs.

In the propofol group, general anesthesia will be induced using target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol and remifentanil.

In the sevoflurane group, induction of general anesthesia will be carried out by spontaneous breathing through a mask while progressively opening up the dial of the sevoflurane vaporizer up to 8%. Like in the propofol group, target-controlled infusion of remifentanil is simultaneously started to reach an initial target predicted effect-site concentration of 3 ng/mL. Vaporizer is adjusted when gas equilibration reaches the patient-specific concentration 1.0 MAC of sevoflurane.

At this point, noxious stimulation will be delayed at least 10 minutes after TCI remifentanil is paused to allow for the remifentanil to be cleared out and to ensure brain-alveolar equilibration of sevoflurane (sevoflurane group).

Measurements of the NOL Index, BIS, HR and MAP start 1 minute before applying noxious stimulus (prestimulation period). Means of the data collected during that period will constitute the basal values for NOL and HR before stimulation. After this stand-by period, electric stimulation is applied. This will consist in a standardized tetanic stimulation to the ulnar nerve of the non-dominant forearm delivered by a routine nerve stimulator at a frequency of 100 Hz and a current of 70 mA for a duration of 30 seconds. Measurements of the NOL Index, BIS, HR and MAP will continue during 3 minutes after (poststimulation period). This window of recording has to be free of any other external stimulation as it could produce noise disturbance on recorded values.

After the stimulation, all the monitors will be used to guide intraoperative administration of hypnotic agents and analgesics. Total consumption of hypnotics and opioids will be recorded for the duration of surgery. Postoperative assessment of pain and opioid consumption will be done in post anesthesia care unit as exploratory outcomes.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • ASA status I, II or III
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Elective surgery under general anesthesia.
  • Good understanding of English or French language

Non-inclusion Criteria

  • Ongoing Coronary artery disease
  • Patients with non-regular sinus cardiac rhythm, implanted pacemakers, prescribed antimuscarinic agents, α2-adrenergic agonists, β1-adrenergic antagonists and antiarrhythmic agents
  • Emergent surgery
  • Pregnancy/lactation
  • Preoperative hemodynamic disturbance
  • Central nervous system disorder (neurologic/head trauma/uncontrolled epileptic seizures)
  • Patient refusal
  • Drug or alcohol abuse within the last 6 months
  • Chronic use of psychoactive drugs
  • Pre-operative chronic opioid use or chronic pain, equivalent to oxycodone 20mg per oral, per day for more than 6 weeks
  • History of psychiatric diseases or psychological problems
  • Allergy or intolerance to any of the study drugs

Exclusion criteria

  • Unexpected difficult airway requesting excessive, possibly painful airway manipulations.
  • Intraoperative unexpected complications requiring strong hemodynamic support (transfusions, vasopressors, inotropes)

Treatment and study plan

Propofol

Drug

In the propofol group, general anesthesia will be induced using target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol and remifentanil. Marsh pharmacokinetic model will be used to set the initial target predicted effect-site concentration of propofol at 3.0 mcg/ml in flash mode. Simultaneously, target-controlled infusion of remifentanil will be started to reach an initial target predicted effect-site concentration of 3 ng/mL using the Minto pharmacokinetic model.

After tracheal intubation, TCI of remifentanil is paused.

Sevoflurane

Drug

In the sevoflurane group, induction of general anesthesia will be carried out by spontaneous breathing through a mask while progressively opening up the dial of the sevoflurane vaporizer up to 8%. Like in the propofol group, target-controlled infusion of remifentanil is simultaneously started to reach an initial target predicted effect-site concentration of 3 ng/mL. Vaporizer is adjusted when gas equilibration reaches the patient-specific concentration 1.0 MAC of sevoflurane. After tracheal intubation, TCI of remifentanil is paused.

Primary outcomes

  1. Delta NOL (no unit for the NOL index)

    Time frame: From 1 minute before to 3 minutes after tetanic stimulation for each patient

    To compare the variation of NOL (delta NOL) after tetanic stimulation under general anesthesia based on propofol versus sevoflurane

Secondary outcomes

  1. Delta Heart Rate (beat per minute)

    Time frame: From 1 minute before to 3 minutes after tetanic stimulation for each patient

    To compare the variation of heart rate after tetanic stimulation under general anesthesia based on propofol versus sevoflurane

  2. Delta Mean Arterial Blood Pressure (unit: mmHg)

    Time frame: From 1 minute before to 3 minutes after tetanic stimulation for each patient

    To compare the variation of mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) after tetanic stimulation under general anesthesia based on propofol versus sevoflurane

  3. Delta BIS (no unit for BIS index)

    Time frame: From 1 minute before to 3 minutes after tetanic stimulation for each patient

    To compare the variation of bispectral index (BIS) after tetanic stimulation under general anesthesia based on propofol versus sevoflurane

  4. Peak value of NOL (no unit)

    Time frame: From 1 minute before to 3 minutes after tetanic stimulation for each patient

    To compare the peak value of NOL after tetanic stimulation under general anesthesia based on propofol versus sevoflurane

  5. Peak value of Heart Rate (unit: beat per minute)

    Time frame: From 1 minute before to 3 minutes after tetanic stimulation for each patient

    To compare the peak value of heart rate after tetanic stimulation under general anesthesia based on propofol versus sevoflurane

  6. Peak value of Mean Arterial Blood Pressure (unit: mmHg)

    Time frame: From 1 minute before to 3 minutes after tetanic stimulation for each patient

    To compare the peak value of mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) after tetanic stimulation under general anesthesia based on propofol versus sevoflurane

  7. Peak value of BIS (no unit)

    Time frame: From 1 minute before to 3 minutes after tetanic stimulation for each patient

    To compare the peak value of bispectral index (BIS) after tetanic stimulation under general anesthesia based on propofol versus sevoflurane

  8. Area Under the Curve for NOL for Propofol Versus Sevoflurane (no unit)

    Time frame: From T0 (start stimulation) to 3 minutes after tetanic stimulation for each patient

    To compare the area under the curve between propofol and sevoflurane between the beginning of stimulation and 3 minutes after stimulation

  9. Area Under the Curve for Heart Rate for Propofol Versus Sevoflurane (no unit)

    Time frame: From T0 (start stimulation) to 3 minutes after tetanic stimulation for each patient

    To compare the area under the curve between propofol and sevoflurane between the beginning of stimulation and 3 minutes after stimulation

  10. Area Under the Curve for Mean Arterial Blood Pressure for Propofol Versus Sevoflurane (no unit)

    Time frame: From T0 (start stimulation) to 3 minutes after tetanic stimulation for each patient

    To compare the area under the curve between propofol and sevoflurane between the beginning of stimulation and 3 minutes after stimulation

  11. Area Under the Curve for BIS for Propofol Versus Sevoflurane (no unit)

    Time frame: From T0 (start stimulation) to 3 minutes after tetanic stimulation for each patient

    To compare the area under the curve between propofol and sevoflurane between the beginning of stimulation and 3 minutes after stimulation

  12. Total Dose of Remifentanil (unit: mcg)

    Time frame: Intraoperative

    Total dose of remifentanil in mcg from induction of anesthesia until tracheal extubation

  13. Total Dose of Propofol (unit: mg)

    Time frame: Intraoperative

    Total dose of propofol in mg from induction of anesthesia until tracheal extubation in Propofol group

  14. Total Dose of Sevoflurane (unit: mL)

    Time frame: Intraoperative

    Total dose of sevoflurane in mL from induction of anesthesia until tracheal extubation in Sevoflurane group

  15. Total Dose of Hydromorphone in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (unit: mg)

    Time frame: From entrance in post-anesthesia care unit until post-anesthesia care unit discharge, an average of 2 hours

    Total dose of hydromorphone in mg in post-anesthesia care unit

  16. post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) Pain Scores at Rest (scale from 0 to 10)

    Time frame: From entrance in post-anesthesia care unit until post-anesthesia care unit discharge, an average of 2 hours

    Pain scores on a scale from 0 to 10 at rest in post-anesthesia care unit

  17. post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) Pain Scores during Cough (scale from 0 to 10)

    Time frame: From entrance in post-anesthesia care unit until post-anesthesia care unit discharge, an average of 2 hours

    Pain scores on a scale from 0 to 10 during cough effort in post-anesthesia care unit

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréal

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Use of the NOL Index to Compare the Intraoperative Analgesic Effect of Propofol Versus Sevoflurane After Standardized Stimulation in Patients Under General Anesthesia. The PROSEVNOL Study

Acronym: PROSEVNOL

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Sep 28, 2020
Registry last updated
Dec 21, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.