Oxaliplatin
DrugConsolidation Chemotherapy
Other names: All Brands
NCT Number: NCT04864067
This study is designed to explore the hypothesis that in patients with a Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treated with a Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) strategy based on short course radiotherapy (5x5Gy) followed by neoadjuvant consolidation chemotherapy is associated with a higher rate of pathological clinical response and sustained (>1year) complete clinical response when compared to an historical cohort treated with long course chemoradiation therapy (CRT), total mesorectal excision (TME) and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Complejo Asistencial Doctor Sótero del Rio, Santiago, RM, Chile
Non-operative management with a Watch and Wait (W&W) strategy has been advocated for selected patients with a locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and a complete clinical response (cCR) after neoajuvant (NA) treatment.
In this context, total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), i.e the use of radiotherapy and full dose of post-operative chemotherapy as part of NA treatment, has emerged as a strategy to enhance treatment response.
Currently, TNT has reported higher rates of pCR and organ preservation when compared to current standard of care. However, the best TNT strategy is still unknown. We therefore hypothesize that in LARC patients, the use of a TNT strategy based on short course RT followed by consolidation chemotherapy is associated with a higher rate of pCR and sustained (>1year) cCR when compared to an historic cohort.
The main aim of the present proposal is to assess the effects of a standardized TNT model in LARC patients as a strategy for enhanced pCR/sustained cCR. For this purpose, we propose the following experimental model: In primary Aim 1 we will study if the effects of a TNT strategy over patients with a LARC enhance the rate of pCR/sustained cCR by (1) evaluating the compliance and toxicity of a TNT strategy as a proof of concept of its applicability, (2) assessing the rate of cCR at the end of TNT and (3) assessing the rate of pCR in the surgically managed subgroup and sustained cCR (>1year) in the W&W subgroup. Additionally, in primary Aim 2, we will determine if patients with a W&W strategy have better functional outcomes and quality of life (QoL) than patients treated with TME after TNT by (1) using validated questionnaires for the evaluation of bowel, sexual and urinary function for W&W and TME patients and (2) by evaluating the QoL using a widely-used standardized questionnaire.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Consolidation Chemotherapy
Other names: All Brands
Consolidation Chemotherapy
Other names: All Brands
Consolidation Chemotherapy
Other names: All Brands
Consolidation Chemotherapy
Other names: All Brands
Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy
Quality of Life Evaluation (LARS Score, IIEF, FSFI, I-PSS and EORTC QLQ-C30)
Flexible Sigmoidoscopy and Digital Rectal Exam
Time frame: 3 years
Combined number of patients with pathological response in the surgical specimen and patients in a Watch and Wait protocol with a sustained clinical response longer than a year.
Time frame: 3 years
Standardized evaluation using validated questionnaires comparing patients undergoing TME versus WW patients in the cohort
Time frame: 3 years
Adverse events will be graded using the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0.
Servicio de Salud Metropolitano Sur Oriente
Other Gov
No Operation After Short Course Equivalent Dose (Ht) Radiation Therapy Followed By Consolidation Chemotherapy In Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: The Prospective, Single Arm NOAHS-ARC Trial
Acronym: NOAHS-ARC
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04028479
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01111604
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01206530
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00847119
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
L'Hospitalet Del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
View Trial Details