Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02053493

Nitrate's Effect on Activity Tolerance in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover study to assess effect of isosorbide mononitrate with dose up-titration on activity tolerance as assessed by (hip-worn, tri-axial) accelerometry.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

50 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Christiana Care Health Services, Newark, Delaware, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate increases daily activity as assessed by 14-day averaged arbitrary accelerometry units in comparison to placebo.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 50 years
  • Symptoms of dyspnea (NYHA class II-IV) without evidence of a non-cardiac or ischemic explanation for dyspnea
  • Ejection fraction (EF) ≥ 50% as determined on imaging study within 12 months of enrollment with no change in clinical status suggesting potential for deterioration in systolic function
  • Stable medical therapy for 30 days as defined by:
  • No addition or removal of ACE, Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers (CCBs) or aldosterone antagonists
  • No change in dosage of ACE, ARBs, beta-blockers,CCBs or aldosterone antagonists of more than 100%
  • One of the following within the last 12 months
  • Previous hospitalization for heart failure (HF) with radiographic evidence of pulmonary congestion (pulmonary venous hypertension, vascular congestion, interstitial edema, pleural effusion) or
  • Catheterization documented elevated filling pressures at rest (LVEDP≥15 or PCWP≥20) or with exercise (PCWP≥25) or
  • Elevated NT-proBNP (> 400 pg/ml) or BNP (> 200 pg/ml) or
  • Echo evidence of diastolic dysfunction / elevated filling pressures (at least two) E/A > 1.5 + decrease in E/A of > 0.5 with valsalva Deceleration time ≤ 140 ms Pulmonary vein velocity in systole < diastole (PVs<PVd)sinus rhythm) E/e'≥15 Left atrial enlargement (≥ moderate) Pulmonary artery systolic pressure > 40 mmHg Evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy
  • LV mass/BSA ≥ 96 (♀) or ≥ 116 (♂) g/m2
  • Relative wall thickness ≥ 0.43 (♂ or ♀) [(IVS+PW)/LVEDD]
  • Posterior wall thickness ≥ 0.9 (♀) or 1.0 (♂) cm
  • No chronic nitrate therapy or infrequent (≤ 1x week) use of intermittent sublingual nitroglycerin within last 3 months
  • Ambulatory (not wheelchair / scooter / walker / cane dependent)
  • HF is the primary factor limiting activity as indicated by answering # 2 to the following question:

My ability to be active is most limited by:

  • Joint, foot, leg, hip or back pain
  • Shortness of breath and/or fatigue and/or chest pain
  • Unsteadiness or dizziness
  • Lifestyle, weather, or I just don't like to be active
  • Body size allows wearing of the accelerometer belt as confirmed by ability to comfortably fasten the test belt provided for the screening process (belt designed to fit persons with BMI 20-40 Kg/m2 but belt may fit some persons outside this range)
  • Willingness to wear the accelerometer belt for the duration of the trial 11. Willingness to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Recent (< 3 months) hospitalization for HF
  • Hemoglobin < 8.0 g/dl
  • Glomerular filtration rate < 20 ml/min/1.73 m2 on most recent clinical laboratories
  • SBP < 110 mmHg or > 180 mmHg at consent
  • Diastolic blood pressure < 40 mmHg or > 100 mmHg at consent
  • Resting HR > 110 bpm at consent
  • Previous adverse reaction to nitrates necessitating withdrawal of therapy
  • Chronic therapy with phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors (intermittent use of phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction is allowable if the patient is willing to hold for the duration of the trial)
  • Regularly (> 1x per week) swims or does water aerobics
  • Significant COPD thought to contribute to dyspnea
  • Ischemia thought to contribute to dyspnea
  • Documentation of previous EF < 50%
  • Acute coronary syndrome within 3 months defined by electrocardiographic changes and biomarkers of myocardial necrosis (e.g. troponin) in an appropriate clinical setting (chest discomfort or anginal equivalent)
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting or new biventricular pacing within past 3 months
  • Primary hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
  • Infiltrative cardiomyopathy (amyloid)
  • Constrictive pericarditis or tamponade
  • Active myocarditis
  • Complex congenital heart disease
  • Active collagen vascular disease
  • More than mild aortic or mitral stenosis
  • Intrinsic (prolapse, rheumatic) valve disease with moderate to severe or severe mitral, tricuspid or aortic regurgitation
  • Acute or chronic severe liver disease as evidenced by any of the following: encephalopathy, variceal bleeding, INR > 1.7 in the absence of anticoagulation treatment
  • Terminal illness (other than HF) with expected survival of less than 1 year
  • Enrollment or planned enrollment in another therapeutic clinical trial in the next 3 months
  • Inability to comply with planned study procedures
  • Pregnant women

Treatment and study plan

Isosorbide Mononitrate

Drug

Dispense phase 1 study drug:

Weeks 1 and 2: No study drug (baseline) Week 3: 30 mg ISMN Week 4: 60 mg ISMN Weeks 5 and 6: 120 mg ISMN

Dispense phase-2 study drug:

Weeks 7 and 8: No study drug (washout) Week 9: 30 mg ISMN Week 10: 60 mg ISMN Weeks 11 and 12: 120 mg ISMN

Other names: Imdur, ISMO, Monoket

Placebo

Drug

Dispense phase 1 study drug:

Weeks 1 and 2: No study drug (baseline) Week 3: 30 mg Placebo Week 4: 60 mg Placebo Weeks 5 and 6: 120 mg Placebo

Dispense phase-2 study drug:

Weeks 7 and 8: No study drug (washout) Week 9: 30 mg Placebo Week 10: 60 mg Placebo Weeks 11 and 12: 120 mg Placebo

Primary outcomes

  1. Arbitrary Accelerometry Units (AAU) (Phase I)

    Time frame: 5-6 weeks

    To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate increases daily activity as assessed by 14-day averaged arbitrary accelerometry units in comparison to placebo. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement.

  2. Arbitrary Accelerometry Units (AAU) (Phase II)

    Time frame: 11-12 weeks

    To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate increases daily activity as assessed by 14-day averaged arbitrary accelerometry units in comparison to placebo. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Six Minute Walk Distance (Phase I)

    Time frame: Week 7

    To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) improves functional capacity by 6 minute walk distance in comparison to placebo.

  2. Six Minute Walk Distance (Phase II)

    Time frame: Week 13

    To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) improves functional capacity by 6 minute walk distance in comparison to placebo.

  3. Patient Preference for Isosorbide Mononitrate Treatment at the End of Study.

    Time frame: Week 13

    Self reported participant preference for study period 1 vs. study period 2.

  4. Borg Score During 6 Minute Walk Test (Phase I)

    Time frame: Week 7

    To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves quality of life in comparison to placebo. The Borg Scale consists of scale range of 0 to 10 (where 0 indicates no breathlessness at all and 10 indicates maximum breathlessness). Lower values are considered to be better than higher values.

  5. Borg Score During 6 Minute Walk Test (Phase II)

    Time frame: Week 13

    To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves quality of life in comparison to placebo. The Borg Scale consists of scale range of 0 to 10 (where 0 indicates no breathlessness at all and 10 indicates maximum breathlessness). Lower values are considered to be better than higher values.

  6. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (Phase I)

    Time frame: Week 7

    To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves quality of life in comparison to placebo. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a disease-specific patient-reported outcomes measure for patients with heart failure. It consists of 23 items, is comprised of 7 clinically relevant scales (Symptom Frequency, Symptom Burden, Symptom Stability, Physical Limitation, Social Limitation, Quality of Life, and Self-Efficacy), and yields 3 summary scores (Clinical Summary, Total Symptom, and Overall Summary Scores). Scale and summary scores range between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating better health status (eg, better functioning, fewer symptoms, better quality of life).

  7. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (Phase II)

    Time frame: Week 13

    To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves quality of life in comparison to placebo. • The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a disease-specific patient-reported outcomes measure for patients with heart failure. It consists of 23 items, is comprised of 7 clinically relevant scales (Symptom Frequency, Symptom Burden, Symptom Stability, Physical Limitation, Social Limitation, Quality of Life, and Self-Efficacy), and yields 3 summary scores (Clinical Summary, Total Symptom, and Overall Summary Scores). Scale and summary scores range between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating better health status (eg, better functioning, fewer symptoms, better quality of life).Higher values of the overall KCCQ score are considered to be better than lower values.

  8. N-terminal Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide Level (Phase I)

    Time frame: Week 7

    To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves natriuretic peptide levels in comparison to placebo

  9. N-terminal Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide Level (Phase II)

    Time frame: Week 13

    To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves natriuretic peptide levels in comparison to placebo

  10. Improvement in Daily Activity - Hours Active Per Day (Phase I)

    Time frame: 5-6 weeks

    To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Hours active per day during maximal dose of study drug

  11. Improvement in Daily Activity - Hours Active Per Day (Phase II)

    Time frame: 11-12 weeks

    To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Hours active per day during maximal dose of study drug

  12. Improvement in Daily Activity - Slope of Daily Average (Phase I)

    Time frame: 3-6 weeks

    To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Slope of daily averaged arbitrary accelerometry units during study drug administration. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement.

  13. Improvement in Daily Activity - Slope of Daily Average (Phase II)

    Time frame: 9-12 weeks

    To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Slope of daily averaged arbitrary accelerometry units during study drug administration. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement.

  14. Improvement in Daily Activity - Area Under the Curve (Phase I)

    Time frame: 3-6 weeks

    To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Area under the curve (AUC) of arbitrary accelerometry units during study drug administration. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement. Area under the curve is defined as ((7*average acceleromtery units/day during 30 mg) + (7*average acceleromtery units/day during 60 mg) + (14*average acceleromtery units/day during 120 mg))/28

  15. Improvement in Daily Activity - Area Under the Curve (Phase II)

    Time frame: 9-12 weeks

    To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Area under the curve (AUC) of arbitrary accelerometry units during study drug administration. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement. Area under the curve is defined as ((7*average acceleromtery units/day during 30 mg) + (7*average acceleromtery units/day during 60 mg) + (14*average acceleromtery units/day during 120 mg))/28

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Adrian Hernandez

Other

Collaborators

  • Mayo Clinic
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
  • University of Vermont

Registry information

Acronym: NEAT-HFpeF

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Feb 3, 2014
Registry last updated
Nov 28, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.