Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02069392

Nicotinic Enhancement of Cognitive Remediation Training in Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is marked by problems in attention, memory and problem solving. These deficits predict long-term functional outcome such as the ability to live independently and maintain employment, but they are not ameliorated by currently available medications. Cognitive training improves these functions to some degree, but this approach is time- and resource-intensive. The current project aims at enhancing and accelerating the benefits that people with schizophrenia derive from cognitive training by administering nicotine during some of the training sessions. This would provide the proof of principle for a type of treatment intervention to improve cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia.

The current project aims at determining whether the intermittent presence of nicotine during cognitive training exercises in people with schizophrenia will shorten the training period necessary to induce significant and clinically relevant improvement and enhance the improvement seen after a training period of specified length.

Hypothesis 1a: Nicotine administration during training will increase the size of all measured effects of the training intervention, and will accelerate the time course of performance enhancement on the MCCB and training exercise progression parameters.

Hypothesis 1b: The larger training effects in the Nicotine Group will persist beyond the end of the intervention.

Hypothesis 2a: Within-session progress on the training exercises will be larger in the presence of nicotine than in the presence of placebo.

Hypothesis 2b: These acute nicotine-induced performance elevations will persist beyond the presence of nicotine through subsequent non-drug training sessions, giving evidence of an acute facilitation of learning processes.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Maryland Psychiatric Research Center

Baltimore, Maryland, 21228, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18-60 years.
  • DSM diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.
  • Ability to give written informed consent.
  • Either currently smoking and not attempting to quit, or having smoked no more than 80 cigarettes, cigarillos or cigars in lifetime and not at all within the last year.
  • Normal or corrected to normal vision (at least 20/50).
  • Four weeks of stable pharmacological treatment (same psychiatric medication at same dose) and no foreseeable changes at enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

  • Alcohol or substance abuse or dependence other than nicotine within the last 12 months.
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (resting systolic blood pressure above 150 or diastolic above 90 mm Hg).
  • History of myocardial infarction, heart failure, angina, stroke or severe arrhythmias.
  • ECG abnormalities.
  • History of neurological conditions such as stroke, seizures, dementia or organic brain syndrome.
  • Mental retardation.
  • Pregnant, verified by urine pregnancy test for females.
  • Breast-feeding.
  • Treated with benztropine currently or within the last four weeks.

Treatment and study plan

Cognitive Remediation Training

Behavioral

Other names: Posit Science cognitive remediation training

Nicotine polacrilex lozenge

Drug

Of interest are the effects of nicotine on cognitive remediation training benefits.

Other names: Nicorette polacrilex lozenges, GlaxoSmithKline, 2 mg and 4 mg

Primary outcomes

  1. MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Composite Score

    Time frame: baseline (week 0), weeks 4 and 7 of intervention, end-of-intervention (week 10), 4-week follow-up

    The MCCB is an FDA-approved assessment tool for trials of cognition-enhancing treatments in people with schizophrenia. The MCCB is comprised of the following domains: 1) Speed of Processing; 2) Attention/Vigilance; 3) Working Memory; 4) Verbal Learning; 5) Visual Learning; 6) Reasoning and Problem Solving; and 7) Social Cognition. The composite score is standardized to a T-scale (mean=50, standard deviation=10) based on healthy control normative data. Better performance is reflected by higher scores.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cognitive Assessment Interview (CAI) Score

    Time frame: baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 10)

    Clinician-administered interview about daily life cognitive functioning. The CAI assesses 10 items related to working memory, attention/vigilance, learning/memory, problem solving, processing speed, and social cognition. The total score ranges from 1 (inability to maintain personal hygiene due to cognitive deficits) to 100 (superior cognitive functioning in a wide range of activities). A score of 55 corresponds to moderate cognitive symptoms, e.g. persistent problems paying attention or forgetting scheduled events.

  2. Change in Abbreviated Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale Score

    Time frame: baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 10)

    Semi-structured clinician interview measuring functional outcome and quality of life in people with schizophrenia. Includes subjective questions regarding life satisfaction and objective indicators of social and occupational role functioning during preceding 4 weeks. Seven items are scored on a 0 (severe impairment) to 6 (high functioning) scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 42, with larger values reflecting higher functioning.

  3. UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA) Score

    Time frame: baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 10)

    Measures ability to perform real-life tasks by standardized role-play. Scores reflect percent correct, i.e. range from 0-100 with higher scores representing better performance.

  4. Calgary Depression Scale Score

    Time frame: baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 10)

    Clinician scale developed to assess the level of depression in schizophrenia. 9 items assess symptoms of depression and overall rater impression on a scale from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe).

  5. Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Score

    Time frame: baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 10)

    Clinician rating scale of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Within each of 5 domains, separate symptoms are rated from 0 (absent) to 5 (severe). Total scores are the sum of 22 subscales and range from 0 to 110, with larger values reflecting higher negative symptoms.

  6. Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) Score

    Time frame: baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 10)

    Clinician rating scale to measure psychotic symptoms. Each of 20 items is scored 1-7. Total scores are the sum of all items and range from 20 to 140, with larger values reflecting worse symptoms.

  7. Training Exercise Parameters: Visual and Sound Sweeps

    Time frame: baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 10), 4-week follow-up

    Some of the Posit Science exercises provide an assessment tool of training progress on task parameters, which adjust continuously to keep performance at ~85% correct. Enhanced sensory processing speed and precision is considered the central building block of training benefits. Therefore, we analyzed the two exercises aimed at training these processes. Performance is quantified as stimulus presentation time in ms of visual or sound "sweeps", which the participant has to judge in terms of change across space or time. Smaller values reflect better performance. Visual and sound sweeps were averaged.

  8. Change in Working Memory Capacity

    Time frame: baseline (week 1) and post-intervention (week 10)

    Derived from a computerized change localization task. One to four colored squares are shown for 100 ms. After a delay, they reappear and the task is to click on the one square that has changed color (50% chance). Performance is expressed as the percentage of correct responses.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Maryland, Baltimore

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Feb 24, 2014
Registry last updated
Sep 12, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.