Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 325 E Eisenhower Pkwy Suite 3011
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48108, United States
NCT Number: NCT06269367
An affordable and easy to use gait-assistive device for stroke survivors to use at home is yet to be developed. This study is intended to modify the current design of the NewGait device to specifically work for stroke survivors based on feedback from patients and clinicians. Consequently, conducting a short-term biomechanical gait study is planned to determine the usability and functionality of the NewGait device compared to other comparative devices.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48108, United States
More than 795,000 individuals suffer from a stroke each year in the United States, making stroke a leading cause of adult disability in the United States and worldwide. More than half of stroke survivors exhibit reduced independence and functional mobility due to stroke-related gait impairments. Despite significant advancements in post-stroke medical care and rehabilitation, current treatments are not successful in optimally restoring gait function after stroke. It is well established that intense, repetitive task-oriented rehabilitation interventions are essential for inducing experience-dependent neuroplasticity (defined as the ability of the nervous system to adapt and optimize its resources through structural and functional changes)-which is a key factor for post-stroke gait recovery. Accordingly, new therapeutic approaches that rely on specialized gait training devices, such as treadmills, robotic devices, and exosuits have been developed. However, these devices are typically expensive, bulky, and not accessible for home use. Moreover, these devices often require uninterrupted power sources, which is a major barrier for rural communities in developing nations. While some lightweight and "low-cost" commercial devices exist, they are not often designed based on multi-user feedback and robust biomechanical data and their clinical utility have not been tested in stroke survivors, thereby limiting usability and effectiveness. Thus, there is a significant unmet clinical need for an effective, affordable, and portable gait mobility/rehabilitation device that is accessible for most stroke survivors. This Phase-I STTR pursues the following specific aims: (1) Identify an optimal NewGait design based on end-user feedback (design sprints) and musculoskeletal modeling to address the needs of stroke rehabilitation, (2) Refine the current prototype using data gathered from design sprints and think aloud technique and perform benchtop testing on the final prototype to validate durability, and (3) Examine short-term gait adaptations and clinical feasibility in stroke survivors by performing a comparative clinical feasibility study in stroke survivors to establish the clinical utility of the NewGait device in comparison with other similar devices. This trial registration is for the third aim only, as the first two aims do not follow under the definition of clinical trial. All devices tested are deemed to be 501(k) exempt devices. The successful completion of this Phase-I STTR will lay the foundation for an evidence-based low-cost gait rehabilitation system that could positively affect the lives of millions of stroke survivors living across the globe.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
wearable limb orthotic device
wearable limb orthotic device
Time frame: Up to 2 hours
Changes in gait speed (from baseline) as measured using the 10 Meter Walk Test between the experimental (NewGait) and control conditions. Participants were timed during the 10 Meter Walk Test to determine their self-selected gait speed while walking overground in a hallway. In this test, participants walked down a 14 meter walkway, and a stopwatch was used to time how long it took participants to cross the intermediate 10 meter distance. The baseline measure for the first device was taken immediately prior to the intervention. Participants then wore the first device, and the during-training measure was taken immediately. After this, participants received training with the device for about 15 minutes, following which, the device was removed and the post-intervention measure was taken immediately for the first device. Participants then rested for 20-30 minutes. This entire process was repeated with the second device. All measures were obtained on the same day.
Time frame: Up to 2 hours
Changes in ankle muscle activation of the leg muscles as measured using surface electromyography between the experimental (NewGait) and control conditions. Muscle activation ranges from 0 to no upper limit, and higher activation meant that the muscle was being used more. The baseline measure for the first device was taken immediately prior to the intervention. Participants then wore the first device, and the during-training measure was taken immediately. After this, participants received training with the device for about 15 minutes, following which, the device was removed, and the post-intervention measure was taken immediately for the first device. Participants then rested for 20-30 minutes. This entire process was repeated with the second device. All measures were obtained on the same day.
Time frame: Up to 2 hours
Changes in paretic leg propulsive force were measured using ground reaction forces obtained from force sensors during walking between the experimental (NewGait) and control conditions. Propulsive force had no upper or lower limit, with a higher number indicating greater propulsion from the paretic limb. The baseline measure for the first device was taken immediately prior to the intervention. Participants then wore the first device, and the during-training measure was taken immediately. After this, participants received training with the device for about 15 minutes, following which, the device was removed, and the post-intervention measure was taken immediately for the first device. Participants then rested for 20-30 minutes. This entire process was repeated with the second device. Results reflect Newton units in force generated divided by Newton units of body weight (N/N) times 100. All measures were obtained on the same day.
Time frame: Up to 2 hours
Changes in paretic leg loading were measured using vertical ground reaction forces obtained from force sensors during walking between the experimental (NewGait) and control conditions.
Time frame: Up to 2 hours
Changes in lower extremity muscle activation as measured using surface electromyography between the experimental (NewGait) and control conditions.
Time frame: Up to 2 hours
Changes in ankle muscle coordination of the leg muscles as measured using surface electromyography between the experimental (NewGait) and control conditions.
University of Michigan
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02425345
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
View Trial DetailsNCT05589402
Bone Diseases, Brain Diseases
Harlingen, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06750692
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Afyonkarahisar, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04992195
Alzheimer Disease, Arterial Thromboembolism
Hong Kong
View Trial Details