Active Neurotech Vital
Device12 weeks treatment for 30 minutes per day, 5 days out of 7.
NCT Number: NCT02214784
Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) is described as an uncontrolled loss of urine which happens when physical activities such as running, jumping and lifting etc are carried out or when increased pressure to the bladder in everyday life is applied by simply sneezing or coughing.
There are various treatment options available - surgical operations, pelvic floor exercises/muscle training and electrical stimulation. This study aims to prove that using the Neurotech Vital device for 12 weeks can stimulate the pelvic floor muscles to strengthen and tone them and in doing so improving stress urinary incontinence. We are comparing the Neurotech Vital device with an altered Neurotech Vital device that does not give the same stimulation treatment. There is a 50% chance of you receiving the altered device, if you do, you will be offered the non-altered Neurotech vital device after your first 12 week treatment programme. Both devices are identical in looks, but give different stimulations through the skin contact electrodes.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
St Hedwig Krankenhaus, Berlin, Germany
The study involves wearing a device that includes a wired garment around the hip and bottom area for a period of 30 minutes, 5 days out of 7, for 12 weeks. During this treatment, electrical stimulation is passed through skin contact electrodes (large sticky black pads) which causes the pelvic floor to contract and relax, without you having to do anything. This treatment is not painful and is very similar to the workout you would get from relaxing and contracting your pelvic floor muscles yourself, however the device produces a much stronger contraction.
The study is open to females who have failed a 6 week exercise programme and have been diagnosed with Stress Urinary Incontinence. It will take place at hospital uro-gynaecology clinics/continence clinics across the United Kingdom. The study could last up to 16 months.
This study is being carried out to further prove that the Neurotech Vital device is an effective way of treating stress urinary incontinence in female participants.The study will look at the results of a 12 week treatment programme with the Neurotech Vital device compared to the modified Neurotech Vital device. It will compare the following:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
12 weeks treatment for 30 minutes per day, 5 days out of 7.
12 weeks treatment for 30 minutes per day for 5 days out of 7.
Time frame: 12 weeks
We will look at the amount of urine in grams which is lost by participants when carrying out a stress test with all participants and compare their urine loss measured at baseline and then what it measures at 12 weeks after the 12 weeks treatment with the device. Comparing these against one another to look at any improvement.
Time frame: 12 weeks
We will look at the scores which are taken from these questionnaires (depending on which answer is ticked by the participant on the questionnaire) at baseline before treatment with the device commences and then again after 12 weeks of treatment with the device and compare the scores for any improvement.
Time frame: 4, 8, 12 and 26 weeks
We will look at the amount of urine in grams which is lost by participants when carrying out a stress test with all participants and compare their urine loss measured at 4, 8 and 12 weeks against each other and calculate any difference to ascertain if any improvment has been gained by following the device treatment schedule.
Time frame: Stress test done at 4, 8 and 12 weeks during treatment with the device and at 6 months, for the main and cohort part of study
The loss of urine in grams after this test at the above time points will be collected and using the definition of dryness (pad weight of less than 1 gram) they will be looked at to see if at any of the above timepoints the participants are classed as dry i.e. have urine loss of less than 1gram following the stres test.
Time frame: 4, 8 and 12 weeks and at 6 months for main and cohort part of the study
We are looking at a significant reduction in the weight of the pad after the stress test has taken place, this improvement is defined as a greater than 50% reduction in pad weight in all particpants who took the test at baseline compared to the weight of the pad at 4, 8 and 12 weeks and at 6months for the main and cohort studies.
Time frame: 4, 8 and 12 weeks and at 6 months, for main and cohort part of the study
reduction in pad weight on the 1-hour pad weight test in relation to the mean intensity of the stimulation delivered during the 12-week treatment programme;
Time frame: 4, 8 and 12 weeks and at 6 months, for main part and cohort part of the study
quality of life assessed using the Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire (I-QOL) (except for the 12 week assessment which is one of the primary endpoints);
Time frame: 4, 8 and 12 weeks and at 6 months for main and cohort part of the study
quality of life questionnaire assessed using the Kings Health Questionnaire (KHQ)
Time frame: 4, 8 and 12 weeks and at 6 months for main and cohort part of the study
urine leakage experienced by the subject at home during a 24-hour period (24-hour pad weight test);
Time frame: 4, 8 and 12 weeks and at 6 months for main and cohort part of the study
dryness, defined as a pad weight of less than 1.3g on the 24-hour pad weight test;
Time frame: 4, 8 and 12 weeks and at 6 months for main and cohort part of the study
significant improvement, defined as a greater than 50% reduction in pad weight from baseline on the 24-hour pad weight test;
Time frame: 4, 8 and 12 weeks and at 6 months for main and cohort part of the study
number of incontinence episodes/day recorded using a 3-day voiding diary;
Time frame: 4, 8 and 12 weeks and at 6 months for main and cohort part of the study
number of pads used/day recorded using a 3-day voiding diary;
Time frame: 4, 8 and 12 weeks and at 6 months for main and cohort part of the study
pelvic floor strength and quality of contraction measured using the Modified Oxford Score;
Time frame: 4, 8 and 12 weeks and at 6 months for main and cohort part of the study
pelvic floor muscle function measured using sonographic/real time ultrasound imaging/recording with displacement measurement using on screen callipers on the sonogram unit to assess volitional contractions
Time frame: We will compare the urine loss against the urine loss after 4weeks treatment with the device and also after 8weeks treatment with the device and 12 weeks treatment
We will look at the amount of urine in grams which is lost by participants when carrying out a stress test with all participants and compare their urine loss measured at 4, 8 and 12 weeks against each other and calculate any difference to ascertain if any improvment has been gained by following the device treatment schedule.
Time frame: 6, 9 and 12 months
time to achieve dryness (i.e. no record of any leaks) on the 3-day voiding diary;
Time frame: 6, 9 and 12 months
compliance with the treatment protocol during the 12-week treatment programme;
Time frame: 12 weeks cohort and main study
subject feedback on the device recorded by the Device Ease of Use Questionnaire following completion of the 12-week treatment programme;
Time frame: Screening to 26 weeks
the safety will be ascertained according to how many participants report any device related adverse events and and device related serious adverse events also we will look at device deficiencies reported by all the participants
Time frame: scores looked at from the questionnaires completed at 9 months and 12 months
The scores collected on these questionnaires will be compared against the scores collected at 12 months - The Kings Health Questionnaire and Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire (I-QOL)both are completed at 9 months into the study and 12 months.
Atlantic Therapeutics
Other
A Randomised Controlled Double-Blind Clinical Study To Evaluate The Safety And Performance Of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) With The Neurotech Vital Device For The Treatment Of Stress Urinary Incontinence
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07668128
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
New Taipei City, Banqiao Dist, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT03913845
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Bethel Park, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02785016
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Frauenfeld, Thurgau, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT07095283
Behavior, Female Urogenital Diseases
Elche, Alicante, Spain
View Trial Details