Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02661789

Neuropsychobiological Correlates of Sex-steroid Hormone Manipulation in Healthy Women: a Risk Model for Depression

The project aimed at identifying neuropsychobiological signatures of pharmacological sex-steroid hormone manipulations in healthy women as a risk model for depression.

The study is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Investigators included 63 healthy female volunteers with regular menstrual cycles between 23 and 35 days. Participants were randomized to active Gonadotrophin-Releasing-Hormone agonist (GnRHa) (goserelin 3.6 mg implant) or placebo (saline injection) intervention, which was initiated in the mid follicular phase (i.e. cycle day 22.6 ±2.5). Sixty women completed follow-up and entered the analyses, except for a few drop outs on some domains. The following domains were addressed at baseline and at follow-up (16±3 days post intervention), (which corresponded to the early ovarian suppression phase of the biphasic hormone response to GnRHa): 1) serotonin transporter binding as imaged by 11CDASB Positron Emission Tomography (PET), 2) functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) emotional processing, 3) fMRI reward processing, 3) rating state fMRI (rsfMRI), 4) structural MRI, 5) Neuropsychology, 6) Psychophysiology, 7) Hypothalamus-Pituitary-Adrenal cortex (HPA)-axis dynamics, 8) Peripheral markers of immunoactive cell responses, 9) Epigenetic factors.

Psychometrics in terms of self reported mental distress and interview based ratings were monitored across the intervention period to monitor potential symptoms of mental distress and psychopathology. Also ovarian hormone responses, peripheral blood markers, and side effects scores were collected across the intervention period.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Aims and hypotheses:

Gender matters in normal brain function as well as in neuropsychiatric disorders. E.g. the vulnerability to mood and anxiety disorders is considerably greater in women. Among other factors, this possibly reflects gender differences in central serotonergic function since dysfunction of serotonergic neurotransmission is critically involved in the pathophysiology of mood and anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, and Alzheimer's disease. In particular, women going through phases in life where sex hormones decline rapidly from high levels or fluctuate, have a higher frequency of severe mood state changes and are more vulnerable to psychiatric disorders, e.g. across the pre to postpartum and menopausal transition. Interestingly, this risk is associated with increased variability of the plasma levels of the sex-hormone estradiol. Therefore, sex-hormone manipulation with a pharmacologically induced biphasic ovarian hormone response serve as a unique opportunity to study how sex-hormone fluctuations provoke mood state changes and increase vulnerability to neuropsychiatric disorders.

In this project investigators aimed at investigating whether sex-hormone manipulation affects: 1. Molecular imaging markers of serotonergic neurotransmission in vivo, 2. Brain structure, architecture and functional connectivity, 3. Stress and inflammatory responses, and 4. Cognitive functions, emotional processing, and information filtering, of importance in the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders.

Mentally healthy female volunteers were assessed at baseline (i.e cycle day 6.6 ±2.2) and at follow-up (i.e 16.2 ±2.6 days post intervention) in the early ovarian suppression phase af a Gonadotrophin-Releasing-Hormone agonist response in a placebo-controlled, double-blinded design (cohort size aim: N=30x2).

Research in neurobiological correlates of vulnerability related to sex-hormone changes is pivotal to improve the etiological understanding of brain disorders with gender differences in their incidence and/or nature. Such research may contribute to ameliorate fertility treatment, to improve treatment of mood disorders and schizophrenia, and, ideally, shed light on possible preventive strategies in vulnerable phases of women's lives such as the pre- to post-partum and menopausal transition period.

Hypotheses:

Investigators hypothesised that sex-hormone manipulation is associated with the following: 1. Compromised serotonergic neurotransmission, 2. Changes in functional and structural connectivity and lower hippocampal brain volumes and/or markers of decreased neurogenesis, 3. Increased stress reactivity and inflammatory responses, and 4. Changes in neurocognitive functioning and negative bias in emotional processing and information filtering. Investigators further hypothesised that these changes occur in a manner dependent on the magnitude of the estradiol drop from baseline and dependent on symptoms of depressed and anxious mood.

General study design:

The study is a prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, combined within-subject and between-group design of neuropsychobiological changes in response to hormonal down-regulation. The investigation program will be performed at baseline in the mid-follicular phase, at day 5-8 of the menstrual cycle, and in the down-regulated state, 14-19 days after GnRHa intervention.

Participants. Investigators aimed at including 60 healthy female volunteers, in the age range 18-40 years. Group 1 (N=30) will receive sex-hormone manipulation with GnRHa, and group 2 (N=30) will receive placebo (saline injection). The inclusion will be stratified according to a polymorphism in the serotonin transporter promoter region (5-HTLPR).

The investigation program includes functional brain imaging of the serotonin transporter with [11C]DASB PET (6) and fMRI, structural brain imaging, blood measurements of sex-hormone levels, inflammatory and epigenetic biomarkers, characterization of the cortisol awakening response, and psychophysiological measures of information processing, and monitoring of symptoms of mental distress and psychopathology across the intervention period. An initial screening program will secure inclusion of healthy controls only and determine trait parameters such as genotypes, IQ and personality measures.

The study was registered at and approved by the Danish Ethical Committee before participant inclusion under the protocol identification number: H-2-2010-108. All participants gave written informed consent.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy women
  • Regular menstrual cycles (23 -35 days cycle length)
  • No systemic or intrauterine steroid hormone use

Exclusion criteria

  • Psychiatric disorder (DSM IV Axis I or WHO ICD-10 diagnostic classification).
  • Prior or present neurological or other severe medical condition including substance abuse.
  • No drug intake suspected to influence results
  • Conditions that may increase risk by participating in the study program including ovarian cysts
  • Pregnancy during the last year
  • Delivery during the last 2 years
  • Presently wishing to obtain pregnancy
  • Breast feeding
  • Not fluent in Danish or severe visual or hearing impairments
  • Earlier or present learning disabilities
  • Claustrophobia (due to MRI scans)
  • Metal implants (excludes MRI)

Treatment and study plan

Goserelin 3.6 mg implant

Drug

Pharmacologically induced biphasic sex-steroid hormone fluctuation

Other names: Zoladex

Placebo

Drug

Injection of saline

Other names: Saline

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes from baseline in symptoms of depression

    Time frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention

    Hamilton 17 item score

  2. Changes from baseline in serotonin transporter binding in volumes of interest (VOIs)

    Time frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention

    PET scan assessed serotonin transporter binding changes

  3. Changes from baseline in fMRI response to emotional faces

    Time frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention

    fMRI response changes to emotional faces in emotion processing network including amygdala reactivity

  4. Changes from baseline in fMRI response to gambling paradigm

    Time frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention

    fMRI response changes to reward (monetary win) paradigm in reward processing network

  5. Changes from baseline in rsfMRI changes in functional connectivity

    Time frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention

    rsfMRI changes in functional connectivity in response to intervention

  6. Changes from baseline in affective cognition (VAMT-24 test)

    Time frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention

    Neuropsychological (VAMT-24 test) outcomes on affective cognition

  7. Changes from baseline in reaction time

    Time frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention

    Changes in reaction time

  8. Serial mood fluctuations (SD of total mood disturbance (TMD) score of daily POMS across intervention period)

    Time frame: Intervention start to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention

    Mood fluctuations measured by serial collection of daily POMS

  9. Changes from baseline in hippocampal volume

    Time frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention

    Hippocampal volumes from structural MRI

  10. Changes in pre-pulse-inhibition (PPI) from baseline

    Time frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention

    Change in amplitude of the startle response to pulse after pre-pulse warning as measured by EMG in the orbicularis oculi muscle (subtraction of averages across a series of 10 repititions at baseline and at follow-up 16±3 days).

  11. Changes in a set of markers of immunoactivity across study period

    Time frame: Baseline, intervention time, flare-up phase and follow-up

    Cytokines, hsCRP and gene transcript profile markers of

  12. Changes in epigenetic markers of estrogen sensitivity

    Time frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention

    Epigenetic (methylation) markers

  13. Changes in HPA-axis dynamics (the cortisol awakening response)

    Time frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention

    The cortical awakening response

  14. Changes in sensorimotor gating (P50 suppression) from baseline

    Time frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention

    Changes in sensorimotor gating (P50 suppression) from baseline

  15. Changes from baseline in hippocampal microstructure

    Time frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention

    Hippocampal microstructure from MRI

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes from baseline in fMRI responses to emotional memory paradigm

    Time frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention

    Changes in brain activation to fMRI emotional memory paradigm - delayed recall forgetting of word prior to emotional disturbance

  2. Changes from baseline in Cohens perceived stress score

    Time frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention

    Changes Cohens perceived stress score

  3. Changes in Pittsburg Sleep Quality Inventory (PSQI)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 time per week until follow-up at 16 ±3 days

    Sleep quality self reported weekly across intervention period

  4. Side effects scores (project specific 15 items questionnaire)

    Time frame: 7, 12 and 30 days post intervention

    Total side effect score across and after intervention period

  5. Changes in SCL-R (Symptom check-list revised)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 time per week from intervention to follow up at 16±3 days post intervention

    Changes in symptoms of psychopathology across intervention period

  6. Major Depression Inventory (MDI)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 time per week from intervention to follow up at 16±3 days post intervention

    Changes in self-reported symptoms of depression across intervention period

  7. Changes in profile of mood states (POMS TMD score)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 time per week from intervention to follow up at 16±3 days post intervention

    Changes in self-reported symptoms of mental distress across intervention period

Other outcomes

  1. Ovarian hormone responses to intervention

    Time frame: Baseline (i.e, cycle day 5-8), intervention time (i.e cycle day 21-23), flare-up phase (i.e, 3-4 days post intervention) and follow-up (i.e.,16±3 days post intervention)

    Ovarian hormone responses to intervention, i.e. concentrations of estradiol, progesterone and testosterone in peripheral blood)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Gitte Moos Knudsen

Other

Collaborators

  • Center for Integrated Molecular Brain Imaging, Copenhagen, Denmak
  • Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center Rigshospitalet
  • Glostrup University Hospital, Copenhagen
  • Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Registry information

Acronym: GnRHa

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Jan 22, 2016
Registry last updated
Jan 22, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.