McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario, L8S4L1, Canada
NCT Number: NCT06006130
Fibromyalgia is a syndrome associated with fatigue and chronic pain, leading to significant physical limitations and impaired quality of life. There are several challenges that complicate the diagnosis and management of fibromyalgia. The etiology is not well defined, as there are several proposed factors that may trigger the genesis of pain in fibromyalgia including physical and/or emotional life stressors, and genetic predispositions involving neuromodulator pathways. Chronic pain in fibromyalgia arises in the absence of tissue pathology, and consequently a lack of consensus on reliable diagnostic criteria. Understanding the neurophysiology of fibromyalgia would aid in the discovery of objective biomarkers for diagnosis. Therefore, the goals of this study are to:
1. Compare the neurophysiological responses in fibromyalgia compared to healthy controls. 2. Determine whether a two-week cTMS protocol will alter pain in individuals with fibromyalgia.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Hamilton, Ontario, L8S4L1, Canada
Fibromyalgia is a syndrome associated with fatigue and chronic pain, leading to significant physical limitations and impaired quality of life. Fibromyalgia affects 1.7% of Canadians, with a higher prevalence in females compared to males at 9:1 [1]. There are several challenges that complicate the diagnosis and management of fibromyalgia. The etiology is not well defined, as there are several proposed factors that may trigger the genesis of pain in fibromyalgia. Chronic pain in fibromyalgia arises in the absence of tissue pathology, and consequently a lack of consensus on reliable diagnostic criteria. Understanding the pathophysiology of fibromyalgia would aid in the identification of objective biomarkers that could be used for diagnosis.
Multiple theories have been posited to explain the genesis of chronic pain. The gate control theory describes the attenuation of pain signals in the spinal cord prior to cortical processing, and it has been hypothesized that loss of this gate control leads to the genesis of chronic pain [2]. Gate control can be observed by reduction of afferent signals during active muscle contraction. For example, the amplitude of the somatosensory-evoked potential (SEP) is attenuated during active contraction [3]. To our knowledge, it is unknown whether such gate control is observed in fibromyalgia. The lack of gate control may contribute to chronic pain in this population.
The sensorimotor theory suggests that incongruency between motor intention and sensory feedback underlies chronic pain where there is an absence of tissue pathology [4]. This may align with the genesis of fibromyalgia, given the findings that those with fibromyalgia have altered tactile and proprioceptive functioning [5]. Corticomuscular coherence (CMC) is a useful tool that uses electroencephalography (EEG) and electromyography (EMG) to probe the synchrony of neural firing between the brain and muscle [6]. To our knowledge, it is unknown how the magnitude of CMC varies in fibromyalgia compared to healthy controls.
Non-invasive brain stimulation in the form of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) has been used to probe the activity of corticospinal and cortical networks in fibromyalgia. When TMS pulses are delivered in a repetitive train, a protocol known as repetitive TMS (rTMS), short-term neuroplasticity can be induced (i.e., a change in the activity of neurons in the brain). In fibromyalgia, Mhalla et al. [7] found that 5 days of 10 Hz rTMS reduced pain intensity and improved quality of life metrics. Controlled pulse parameter transcranial magnetic stimulation (cTMS) is a novel technique that may produce stronger analgesic effects by delivering monophasic pulses that could enhance neuroplasticity compared with conventional rTMS. It is unknown whether a longer intervention period or the use of cTMS could lead to greater analgesic effects.
Finally, central sensitization may explain the widespread chronic pain experienced in fibromyalgia. There are several neuromodulators that contribute to the neurobiology of central sensitization and may be implicated in this condition including serotonin, dopamine, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Serotonin is linked to pain modulation, such that increased levels of 5-HT are associated with hyperalgesia [8]. BDNF has been implicated in the genesis of neuropathic pain [9]. In fibromyalgia compared to healthy controls, serum BDNF levels have been reported to be higher [10]. Abnormal dopamine function may also be associated with fibromyalgia [11]. Positron-emission tomography (PET) studies show lower cortical dopamine D2/D3 binding availability in fibromyalgia compared to healthy controls [12].
Ultimately, a combination of events may lead to widespread chronic pain in fibromyalgia. Understanding the neurophysiology of fibromyalgia would aid in the discovery of objective biomarkers for diagnosis. Therefore, the goals of this study are to:
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
cTMS is a non-invasive, non-painful procedure used to relieve chronic pain and promote short-term changes. The first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle of the left motor cortex will be targeted using neuronavigation software. 2000 pulses will be delivered at 10 Hz stimulation. Stimulation will be delivered at 80% of the resting motor threshold obtained from the right FDI muscle. The delivery of cTMS requires 11 minutes in total.
A sham coil will be utilized for the sham cTMS condition. It is important to note that from the participant perspective, the sham stimulation will feel and sound identical to active. The location and all other parameters of Sham cTMS will be identical to Active cTMS.
Time frame: Experiment 1: At baseline pre-intervention, Experiment 2: At baseline pre-intervention and 2 weeks post-intervention
Using numerical rating (0 to 5) to assess the change in seven health domains including physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbances, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and pain interference. Each category consists of 4 questions. Also uses a numerical rating to asses pain intensity (0-10).
Time frame: Experiment 1: At baseline pre-intervention, Experiment 2: At baseline pre-intervention and 2 weeks post-intervention
This instrument will be used to assess the patients feeling and emotion related to their pain experience.
Time frame: Experiment 1: At baseline pre-intervention, Experiment 2: At baseline pre-intervention and 2 weeks post-intervention
Will be used to assess the patients feeling and emotion related to their pain experience
Time frame: Experiment 1: At baseline pre-intervention, Experiment 2: At baseline pre-intervention and 2 weeks post-intervention
Will be used to assess for symptoms of for Major Depressive Disorder and Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Time frame: Experiment 1: At baseline pre-intervention, Experiment 2: At baseline pre-intervention and 2 weeks post-intervention
Will be used to screen for symptoms of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
Time frame: Experiment 1: At baseline pre-intervention and immediately following 1 treatment session, Experiment 2: At baseline pre-intervention and 2 weeks post-intervention
This will include an assessments of MEPs obtained using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS).
Time frame: Experiment 1: At baseline pre-intervention and immediately following 1 treatment session, Experiment 2: At baseline pre-intervention and 2 weeks post-intervention
This will include an assessments of SICI obtained using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS).
Time frame: Experiment 1: At baseline pre-intervention, Experiment 2: At baseline pre-intervention and 2 weeks post-intervention
Tasks include tactile localization, temporal order judgement (TOJ), and sequential amplitude discrimination
Time frame: Experiment 1: At baseline pre-intervention only
This will include an assessment of SEPs using EEG electrodes.
Time frame: Experiment 1: At baseline pre-intervention only
This will include an assessment of PREPs using EEG electrodes.
Time frame: Experiment 1: At baseline pre-intervention only
This will include an assessment of CMC using EEG electrodes.
Time frame: Experiment 1: At baseline pre-intervention only
This will include an assessment of ERD using EEG electrodes.
McMaster University
Other
Investigating the Neurobiological Contributions to Pain in Patients With Fibromyalgia
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07533487
Fibromyalgia, Muscular Diseases
Cairo, Non US Or Canada, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT04115033
Fibromyalgia, Muscular Diseases
Decatur, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07591766
Behavior, Fibromyalgia
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05962138
Fibromyalgia, Muscular Diseases
Oxford, United Kingdom
View Trial Details