University of Nebraska-Omaha, Biomechanics Research Building
Omaha, Nebraska, 68182, United States
NCT Number: NCT06576687
Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is a common debilitating orthopedic condition that disrupts physical function and decreases quality of life. Not all CAI is the same. It can be mechanical ligamentous laxity, perceived disability often referred to as functional instability, or a combination of the two. However, clinicians and researchers most often combine all chronic ankle instability patients without considering these sub-groups, which may account for poor recovery and recurrence. The objective of this research is to determine functional and neurophysiological differences between sub-groups of CAI to allow for development of evidence-based rehabilitation which may improve patient outcomes.
To accomplish this, the study will determine the differences among CAI sub-groups on performance of a traditional side-hop test and neurocognitive hop test, determine differences in neurophysiological response and motor control between CAI sub-groups during a lower limb and an ankle specific task, and determine the underlying neurophysiological effects of a 4-week neurocognitively enhanced balance training protocol among CAI subgroups. Time to complete each of the hop tests, cortical activation during the balance and force control tasks, and neurocognitive performance will be assessed to determine differences in performance and neurological function among subgroups of CAI
Interested in participating?
Request Info19 year–45 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Omaha, Nebraska, 68182, United States
Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is a common debilitating orthopedic condition that disrupts physical function and decreases quality of life. CAI is heterogenous and can manifest as mechanical ligamentous laxity, perceived disability often referred to as functional instability, or a combination of the two. However, clinicians and researchers most often combine all chronic ankle instability patients without considering these sub-groups, which may account for the poor recovery and recurrent nature of this pathology. Neurocognitive and neurophysiologic discrepancies may explain the different sub-groups; however, technological limitations have previously limited this assessment. The objective of this research is to determine functional and neurophysiological differences between sub-groups of CAI to allow for development of evidence-based rehabilitation which may improve patient outcomes.
To accomplish this, the study will determine the differences among CAI sub-groups on performance of a traditional side-hop test and neurocognitive hop test, determine differences in neurophysiological response and motor control between CAI sub-groups during a lower limb and an ankle specific task, and determine the underlying neurophysiological effects of a 4-week neurocognitively enhanced balance training protocol among CAI subgroups. This study hypothesizes functional performance will be similar between sub-groups during a traditional side-hop test, but those with functional instability without mechanical laxity will perform worse during a choice-reaction hop test compared to those with mechanical ankle instability. It also hypothesizes individuals with functional ankle instability will demonstrate greater cortical activation during the research tasks and after a 4-week balance training protocol compared to individuals with mechanical ankle instability. Time to complete each of the hop tests, cortical activation during the balance and force control tasks, and neurocognitive performance will be assessed to determine differences in performance and neurological function among subgroups of CAI.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Exercises include (1) single-limb hops to stabilization, (2) hop to stabilization and reach, (3) unanticipated hop to stabilization, (4) single-limb stance activities, and (5) continuous choice-reaction hopping.
Other names: Balance and hop-training
Time frame: Baseline and post-rehabilitation (six weeks total)
Amount of time it takes participants to hop medially and laterally across a 30-cm gap ten times will be measured. Greater times equals worse performance.
Time frame: Baseline and post-rehabilitation (six weeks total)
Amount of time it takes participants hop on a mat medially and laterally across a 30-cm gap ten times, using visual cues to direct movement to one of two squares on each side. Greater times equals worse performance.
Time frame: Baseline and post-rehabilitation (six weeks total)
The force control accuracy at 50% maximal contraction for eversion and inversion will be determined. This is analyzed by a non-linear analysis Lyapunov exponent (LyE) which measures the quality or the natural, inherent fluctuations in movement. Greater values indicate reduced neuromuscular control.
Time frame: Baseline and post-rehabilitation (six weeks total)
Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT), a 9-item scale, will be used to measure the severity of functional ankle instability. It is scored from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and post-rehabilitation (six weeks total)
The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Activities of Daily Living Scale will be used to assess physical function in activities of daily living (ADL) for individuals with foot and ankle impairments. It is a patient-reported outcome instrument that is scored as a percentage from 0% to 100%. Higher scores indicate a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and post-rehabilitation (six weeks total)
The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Activities of Daily Living Scale will be used to assess physical function in sports activities for individuals with foot and ankle impairments. It is a patient-reported outcome instrument that is scored as a percentage from 0% to 100%. Higher scores indicate a better outcome.
University of Nebraska
Other
Understanding the Neurophysiology of Ankle Instability to Improve Rehabilitation Outcomes
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07287969
Ankle Injuries, Foot Injuries
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07620015
Ankle Fractures, Ankle Injuries
Kyrenia, Cyprus
View Trial DetailsNCT06586190
Ankle Injuries, Femoral Fractures
View Trial DetailsNCT00906672
Ankle Injuries, Foot Injuries
Besançon, France
View Trial Details