Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Enrolling by Invitation

NCT Number: NCT05115461

Neuropathic Pain and Postural Stability in Patients With Lumbar Radiculopathy

The aim of this study is to answer the questions below;

1. Is there a difference between patients with lumbar radiculopathy suffering from radicular pain and healthy subjects in terms of static and dynamic postural stability? 2. Is there a relationship between postural stability and the neuropathic characteristics of radicular pain?

Enrolling by Invitation

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Izmir Bozyaka Research and Training Hostpital

Izmir, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Patients presenting to our outpatient clinic with radicular pain and MRI findings associated with radiculopathy will be tested for static and dynamic postural stability. Patient demographics, pain intensity, neuropathic pain scores, and level of disability will also be recorded. The demographic data and postural stability scores will also be collected for the control subjects. Differences between the patient and control groups in terms of postural stability parameters will be sought. In addition, the relationship between the variables representing balance in the patient group and the neuropathic pain score and disability will be investigated.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Having radicular pain due to lumbar disc herniation.
  • Root compression on the dominant side on imaging.
  • Root compression at no more than two levels.
  • Radicular pain with at least 3 points on a numerical rating scale.

Exclusion criteria

  • No radicular pain despite root compression on imaging.
  • Midline disc herniation or root compression on the nondominant side.
  • Radicular pain on the non-dominant side.
  • Treatment with neuropathic pain medication or psychotropic medication.
  • Loss of muscle strength on clinical examination.
  • Evidence of lower extremity atrophy, joint contractures, shortening of limbs, or similar disabilities.
  • Presence of vision loss, vestibular or neurological disorders that may cause balance disorders.

Treatment and study plan

Biodex Balance System™ SD

Device

Postural stability index values (anteroposterior, mediolateral and overall) will be measured for static and dynamic conditions.

questionnaires and inventories

Other

questionnaires and inventories related to primary end secondary outcomes will be applied and physical examination will be performed.

Other names: physical examination

Primary outcomes

  1. Dynamic Postural Stability

    Time frame: Once, at baseline

    Postural Stability Test will be performed via Biodex Balance System. This test assesses the patient's ability to maintain the center position (zero point) on a moving balance platform. The test protocol is performed with the following parameters: Duration: 20 seconds, Stability Level: 8, and Stance: two legs. Patients will complete a 1-minute pre-test trial to get used to the device. Then the test will be performed with 3 trials. The patient's performance will be noted as the overall stability index. A high stability index value indicates poor balance and stability.

  2. Static Postural Stability

    Time frame: Once, at baseline

    Postural Stability Test will be performed via Biodex Balance System. This test assesses the patient's ability to maintain the center position (zero point) on a stable platform. The test protocol is performed with the following parameters: Duration: 20 seconds, Stability Level: Static, and Stance: both legs, alternating. Patients will complete a 1-minute pre-test trial to get used to the device. Then the test will be performed with 3 trials. The patient's performance will be noted as the overall stability index. A high stability index value indicates poor balance and stability.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Neuropathic pain

    Time frame: Once, at baseline

    It will be assessed using the painDETECT questionnaire. The PainDETECT questionnaire contains nine questions, all based on self-assessment. Seven items are rated on a six-point Likert scale, ranging from 0-5. These seven questions query some sensations such as burning, tingling or prickling, allodynia, numbness, etc. Apart from these seven items, one item assesses the radiation of pain and another item asks about the temporal characteristics of pain. A total score of 12 or less indicates neuropathic component is unlikely, 13-18 means a possible neuropathic component and 19 or greater means that a neuropathic component is likely. In addition, there are three items in a separate section that measure the severity of pain at the time of assessment, on average, and at most in the last month. This section is not included in the assessment.

  2. Disability

    Time frame: Once, at baseline

    It will be assessed using Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. This scale contains 6 domains of activity affected by back pain: bed/rest (items 1-3), sitting/standing (items 4-6), ambulation (items 7-9), movement (items 10-12), bending/stooping (items 13-16), and handling of large/heavy objects (items 17-20). For each item, a 6-point Likert scale (0-5) to indicate the level of difficulty is used, where 0 = "not difficult at all," 1 = "minimally difficult," 2 = "somewhat difficult," 3 = "fairly difficult," 4 = "very difficult," and 5 = "unable to do." The total score is calculated by adding up the scores of each items. Scores range from 0 (no disability) to 100 (maximal disability).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Postural Stability in Patients With Lumbar Radiculopathy and it's Relation to Neuropathic Pain: a Cross Sectional Case-control Study

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Nov 10, 2021
Registry last updated
Nov 4, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.