Centro Médico Teknon
Barcelona, 08022, Spain
NCT Number: NCT04282213
Mechanomyography (MMG) is considered the gold-standard for neuromuscular blockade (NMB) monitoring. However, it is quite bulky and difficult to use on a routine basis. Therefore, alternative methods like Acceleromyography (AMG), Electromyography (EMG) and the TOF-CUFF method have been developed. The aim of this study was to compare the TOF-Cuff monitor and Electromyography (EMG-NMT module with the CARESCAPE B450 monitor) data following rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade and its reversal.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Observational
Barcelona, 08022, Spain
Neuromuscular relaxation of the patient during surgery is necessary for multiple reasons, such as facilitating intubation or improving the effectiveness of some surgical procedures. Premature extubation of the patient without having achieved a complete recovery of the NMB can have deleterious consequences, increasing postoperative complications, especially those related to the respiratory system. Given this, current guidelines of good clinical practice recommend the monitoring of pharmacologically induced NMB during general anesthesia. In addition, monitoring allows confirmation of optimum relaxation before intubation, and allows for control over re-dose administration and recovery of NMB upon awakening from general anesthesia.
There are different methods of quantitative monitoring of NMB. The TOF-CUFF monitor uses a method based on a traditional pressure cuff that incorporates stimulation electrodes. The placement of the cuff which aligns the stimulation electrodes on the path of the brachial plexus at the humeral level allows to evaluate the muscular response evoked from the changes in the cuff pressure, generated by the muscular contraction after the electrical stimulus. Its main advantage is that monitoring of the NMB is included within the pressure cuff itself, which is always used in any anesthetic act. Then, when the pressure cuff is placed, monitoring of the NMB is easily established. This specific design facilitates the task of anesthesiologists because they do not have to perform any additional preparation for the monitoring of NMB.
The TOF-CUFF monitor has been validated regarding the mechanomyography, which is considered the gold-standard for the monitoring of NMB. The main objective of the study is to compare the values of NMB measured with the TOF-CUFF monitor with NMB values measured with the CARESCAPE B450 monitor during the pharmacologically induced NMB and evaluate the degree of equivalence in different situations. Secondary objective is to verify that the design for joint monitoring of the NMB and NIBP in the TOF-CUFF monitor does not affect the independent measure of the two variables.
Prospective, single-center, open and controlled observational clinical study. The study is aimed to be conducted with 40 patients aged between 18 and 65 years.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: Baseline
For this measurement, patient is stimulated with four twitches at a known stimulation current. Each twitch is performed every 500ms. The neuromuscular response for each twitch is gathered. Train Of Four ratio consists of the weighting of the fourth stimulus against the first stimulus.
It can be calculated also as a percentage.
Time frame: Baseline
When performing the Train Of Four (TOF) measurement, count of the twitches that are higher than 0.
Time frame: Baseline
Once patient is in a deep neuromuscular blockade, all twitches from Train Of Four (TOF) measurement are 0. In order to evaluate the neuromuscular response, Post Tetanic Count (PTC) measurement is performed.
PTC is splitted in two steps. First, during 5 seconds a tetanic stimulation is performed at 50Hz. If no response is elicited, after a pause of 3 seconds 15 single-twitch stimualtion at 1Hz are performed. PTC value is the count of the single-twitches that are higher than 0.
Time frame: Baseline
For Train Of Four (TOF) measurement, amplitude of the first neuromuscular stimulation response. Units depend on the measurement techniques.
Time frame: Baseline
For Train Of Four (TOF) measurement, amplitude of the second neuromuscular stimulation response. Units depend on the measurement techniques.
Time frame: Baseline
For Train Of Four (TOF) measurement, amplitude of the third neuromuscular stimulation response. Units depend on the measurement techniques.
Time frame: Baseline
For Train Of Four (TOF) measurement, amplitude of the fourth neuromuscular stimulation response. Units depend on the measurement techniques.
Time frame: Baseline
Diastolic pressure in mmHg
Time frame: Baseline
Systolic pressure in mmHg
Time frame: Baseline
Mean pressure in mmHg
Time frame: Baseline
Patient temperature on the palm hand
Servei Central d'Anestesiologia
Other
Comparison of the TOFCuff Monitor Versus Electromyography in Neuromuscular Monitoring
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06220136
Anesthesia, General, Neuromuscular Blockade
Ankara, Altındağ, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07580144
Atrophy, Frailty
Konya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05006807
Neuromuscular Blockade
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07404579
Neuromuscular Blockade
Zhengzhou, Henan, China
View Trial Details