Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02260258

Neuromuscular Blockade for Post-Cardiac Arrest Care

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate if neuromuscular blockade improves lactate clearance (and preliminary secondary clinical outcome measures) as compared to usual care in post-cardiac arrest patients undergoing targeted temperature management.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Michael Kurz, Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) occurs in more than 300,000 patients in the United States each year with an estimated mortality of greater than 90%. Unfortunately, we currently have little to offer in terms of treatment other than supportive care for the post-cardiac arrest patient. Neuromuscular blockade (NMB) is sometimes utilized in post-arrest patients particularly for the prevention of shivering. However, usage of NMB remains controversial and current American Heart Association (AHA) recommendations are to minimize utilization. Recent prospective randomized trials in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome suggest a mortality benefit from NMB and an excellent safety profile. Furthermore, observational trials in both sepsis and post-cardiac arrest show that the use of NMB is associated with improved survival. Given this, we hypothesize that continuous NMB will be beneficial in post-arrest patients. In order to test this hypothesis, we propose a multi-center, randomized, open-label, phase II trial in post-CA patients comparing sustained NMB administration for 24 hours to standard of care after return of spontaenous circulation (ROSC). We will enroll adult, comatose OHCA patients with ROSC and will utilize an already existing clinical trials network for the completion of the study. Patients will be randomized to receive either rocuronium for 24 hours or to receive placebo with usual care. Previous data from our group has suggested that lactate levels in the post-arrest patient are a good surrogate marker for mortality. We have therefore chosen to utilize lactate levels at 24 hours as the primary endpoint for the current trial. Secondarily we will evaluate clinical endpoints including length of stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality, and good neurological outcome. We will perform a sub-study of inflammatory markers and oxygen consumption.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult (≥ 18 years)
  • Cardiac arrest with sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC)
  • Comatose (i.e., not following commands) following ROSC
  • Undergoing targeted temperature management (TTM)
  • Time of enrollment ≤ 6 hours from initiation of targeted temperature management
  • Serum Lactate ≥2

Exclusion criteria

  • Pre-existing dementia, severe brain injury, or dependence on others for activities of daily living (i.e. a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 4 or higher)
  • Traumatic etiology of the cardiac arrest
  • Protected population (pregnant, prisoner)

Treatment and study plan

Rocuronium

Drug

Neuromuscular Blockade

normal saline

Drug

Normal Saline

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Lactate Over 24 Hours

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Change in median serum lactate level between enrollment and 24-hours after the receipt of study drug. A negative number indicates that the lactate levels were lower at 24 hours compared to their level at receipt of study drug.

  2. Change in Lactate Over 24 Hours: Effect Estimate

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Interaction between allocated treatment and time: ratio of geometric mean differences over 24 hours in log lactate values between the two groups.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time ROSC to Target Temperature

    Time frame: Duration of hospitalization, limit 180 days

    Time from return of spontaneous circulation to target temperature

  2. Length of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay

    Time frame: Length of Stay Truncated at 28 Days

    Length of stay in ICU

  3. Mechanical Ventilation Duration

    Time frame: Duration of hospitalization, limit 180 days

    Mechanical Ventilation Duration in Hours

  4. Survival

    Time frame: Duration of hospitalization, limit 180 days

    In-hospital survival

  5. Number of Participants With Rankin Score ≤3

    Time frame: Duration of hospitalization, limit 180 days

    Modified Rankin scale to assess neurological outcome at discharge. The scale ranges from 0 to 6, and is used for measuring the performance of daily activities. The score is as follows:

    • 0: No symptoms
    • 1: No significant disability (able to carry out all usual activities, despite some symptoms)
    • 2: Slight disability (able to look after own affairs without assistance, but unable to carry out all previous activities)
    • 3: Moderate disability (requires some help, but able to walk unassisted)
    • 4: Moderately severe disability (unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance, and unable to walk unassisted)
    • 5: Severe disability (requires constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent)
    • 6: Dead.

    Higher cores represent worse outcomes. Good and bad neurological outcome will be defined as a score of 0-3 and 4-6 respectively. This outcome reports the number of patients with a good neurological outcome( modified Rankin score ≤ 3)

  6. Muscle Weakness Score

    Time frame: Duration of hospitalization, limit 180 days

    Medical Research Council Scale : Measured for 6 muscle groups (3 in the upper limbs and 3 in the lower limbs). Maximum score is 30 (grade 5 for each group) and minimum is 0 (grade 0 for each group). If muscle group strength was not symmetric bilaterally, higher measurement used. Higher scores indicate better outcomes.

    Grade 5: Muscle contracts normally against full resistance. Grade 4: Muscle strength is reduced but muscle contraction can still move joint against resistance.

    Grade 3: Muscle strength is further reduced such that the joint can be moved only against gravity with the examiner's resistance completely removed.

    Grade 2: Muscle can move only if the resistance of gravity is removed. As an example, the elbow can be fully flexed only if the arm is maintained in a horizontal plane.

    Grade 1: Only a trace or flicker of movement is seen or felt in the muscle or fasciculations are observed in the muscle.

    Grade 0: No movement is observed

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Other

Collaborators

  • Beaumont Hospital
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Registry information

Acronym: NMB_in_CA

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Oct 9, 2014
Registry last updated
Jan 29, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.