Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01357980

Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity Following Spinal Cord Injury or Multiple Sclerosis

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of a single dose of 750 U of Dysport compared to placebo for the improvement in the daily incontinence episode frequency for each administration mode in subjects suffering from neurogenic detrusor overactivity following spinal cord injury or multiple sclerosis.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Faculty Hospital Motol, Prague, Czechia

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject, family member or care giver was willing and able to perform clean intermittent catheterisation (CIC) for the duration of the study
  • Inadequate response or refractory to anticholinergic medication
  • Botulinum Toxin naive for intradetrusor injections and with no previous treatment with Botulinum Toxin of any type, within 3 months prior to study entry for any other condition
  • Have a minimum of 2 incontinences per day calculated as the average daily incontinence episode frequency (IEF) over the 3 days preceding the baseline visit

Exclusion criteria

  • Significant Baseline renal and/or urinary tract pathology
  • Previous treatment with any endovesical pharmacology agent including detrusor Botulinum Toxin injection

Treatment and study plan

Botulinum toxin type A

Biological

750 U intra detrusor injection on Day 1 (single dose)

Other names: AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®)

Placebo

Drug

Intra detrusor injection on Day 1 (single dose)

Primary outcomes

  1. Daily Incontinence Episode Frequency (IEF)

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 84

Secondary outcomes

  1. Urodynamics: Maximum Cystometric Capacity

    Time frame: Baseline, Days 14, 42 and 84

    Maximum Cystometric Capacity is an urodynamic parameter that indicates the volume at which a patient feels he (she) can no longer delay release of urine from the urinary bladder. Baseline urodynamics exams done at screening visit.

  2. Urodynamics:Maximum Detrusor Pressure

    Time frame: Baseline, Days 14, 42 and 84

    Maximum Detrusor Pressure is an urodynamic parameter that is the maximum value of the pressure within the bladder which is measured during the filling phase of the urodynamic exam. Baseline urodynamics exams done at screening visit.

  3. Physician's Global Assessment Score of Treatment Response

    Time frame: Day 14

    The subject's treatment response was assessed by the physician and graded as 'markedly worse', 'much worse', 'worse', 'slightly worse', 'no change', 'slightly improved', 'improved', 'much improved', or 'markedly improved'.

  4. Physician's Global Assessment Score of Treatment Response

    Time frame: Day 42

    The subject's treatment response was assessed by the physician and graded as 'markedly worse', 'much worse', 'worse', 'slightly worse', 'no change', 'slightly improved', 'improved', 'much improved', or 'markedly improved'.

  5. Physician's Global Assessment Score of Treatment Response

    Time frame: Day 84

    The subject's treatment response was assessed by the physician and graded as 'markedly worse', 'much worse', 'worse', 'slightly worse', 'no change', 'slightly improved', 'improved', 'much improved', or 'markedly improved'.

  6. Quality of Life (QoL) Total Summary Score

    Time frame: Baseline, 14, 42 and 84

    Mean Change from Baseline in Short Form (SF)-Qualiveen Questionnaire Calculated Total Score.

    The SF-Qualiveen questionnaire is a specific health related QoL questionnaire validated for urinary disorders in subjects with neurological conditions containing 8 items looking at four scales: limitations (2 items); constraints (2 items); fears (2 items) and feelings (2 items). The 8 items each having a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0="Not at all" to 4="Extremely" for the first 6 items, from 0="Never" to 4="Always" for item 7 and from 0="Always" to 4="Never" for item 8. The score per scale has been calculated as the mean of the two items. In case of one missing item among the 2 items for a given scale, the score has not been calculated.

    Total score has been calculated as the mean of all the items completed among the 8 items.

    Lower scores indicate a better QoL (i.e. no limitations, fears, constraints, or negative feelings) and higher scores indicate poorer QoL.

  7. Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score: Before Treatment Injection

    Time frame: Baseline

    Pain assessment using the VAS. The VAS is a 100-mm (10-cm) scoring scale. Score range on VAS is from 0 to 100 where zero [0] indicates no pain and 100 indicates worst possible pain.

  8. Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score: During Treatment Injection Procedure

    Time frame: Baseline

    Pain assessment using the VAS. The VAS is a 100-mm (10-cm) scoring scale. Score range on VAS is from 0 to 100 where zero [0] indicates no pain and 100 indicates worst possible pain.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ipsen

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase IIa, Multicentre, Double Blind, Single Dose, Parallel Group, Placebo Controlled, Clinical Pilot Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of a Single Dose, Intra-Detrusor Injections of 750 Units of Dysport® in Subjects Suffering From Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity Following Spinal Cord Injury or Multiple Sclerosis.

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
May 23, 2011
Registry last updated
Sep 27, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.