Division of Neurorehabilitation, University Hospital of Geneva
Geneva, Canton of Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
NCT Number: NCT02223910
Background: The technology of brain-computer interfaces (BCI) enables the monitoring of brain activity and the generation of a real-time output about specific changes in activity patterns. The recorded subject receives a feedback about the neural activity associated his/her efforts and can thus learn to voluntarily modulate brain activity. There is accumulating evidence that training of motor cortex activations with brain-computer interface systems can enhance recovery in stroke patients. Here we propose a new approach which trains resting-state correlates of motor performance instead of activations related to movements. Previous studies have shown that the more resting-state alpha oscillations in the motor cortex are coherent with the rest of the brain, the better stroke patients perform in motor tasks. Furthermore, observational studies have suggested that training of alpha-band coherence in the motor cortex with neurofeedback has beneficial effects on motor performance.
Objective : This randomized controlled study aims to test the usefulness of training functional connectivity between the motor cortex and the rest of the brain with a brain-computer interface in patients with chronic stroke. We hypothesized that this network variant of neurofeedback training will lead to region and frequency specific increases in functional connectivity and to an improved function of the affected upper extremity.
Methods : 10 patients with chronic stroke and significant unilateral deficit of upper extremity motor function will perform two periods of neurofeedback training in a randomized cross-over design. In one period, they will train alpha-band coherence between intact areas around the affected motor cortex and the rest of the brain. In a control period, they will train alpha-band coherence between a control region not directly related to motor function (the medial prefrontal cortex of the healthy hemisphere) and the rest of the brain. In each period, two training sessions per week will be performed for 4 weeks. The periods are separated by at least 4 weeks. Oscillations in the brain will be reconstructed from 128 EEG channels using an adaptive spatial filter and the coherence between the target area and the rest of the brain will be calculated in real time. Coherence magnitude will be displayed in the form of a cursor on a computer screen.
Significance: This study may provide causal evidence for a role of functional connectivity in motor learning and may lead to new strategies for rehabilitation.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me16 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Geneva, Canton of Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: Week 4
Change in Fugl Meyer Upper Extremity Motor Assessment Score from before to after treatment.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Change in Fugl Meyer Upper Extremity Motor Assessment Score from before treatment to 1 month after treatment.
Time frame: 4 weeks
For calculation of the compound motor score, the Fugl Meyer Upper Extremity Motor Assessment, the Nine Hole Peg test, and the Jamar Dynamometer assessment are each normalized to values and then averaged. Change is computed as difference from before treatment to after treatment.
Time frame: 8 weeks
For calculation of the compound motor score, the Fugl Meyer Upper Extremity Motor Assessment, the Nine Hole Peg test, and the Jamar Dynamometer assessment are each normalized to values and then averaged. Change is computed as difference from before treatment to 4 weeks after treatment.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Change in Nine Hole Peg test from before treatment to after treatment.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Change in Nine Hole Peg test from before treatment to 4 weeks after treatment.
Time frame: 4 weeks
The Motor Activity Log assessed changes in motor activities of daily living. Change in Nine Hole Peg test from before treatment to after treatment.
Time frame: 8 weeks
The Motor Activity Log assessed changes in motor activities of daily living. Change in Nine Hole Peg test from before treatment to 4 weeks after treatment.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Change in Modified Ashworth Score from before treatment to after treatment.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Change in Modified Ashworth Score from before treatment to 4 weeks after treatment.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Change in Medical Research Council (MRC) muscle strength from before treatment to after treatment.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Change in Medical Research Council (MRC) muscle strength from before treatment to 4 weeks after treatment.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Change in Change in European Stroke Scale from before to after treatment.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Change in Change in European Stroke Scale from before to 4 weeks after treatment.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Change in walking speed as measured with 10m walking test from before to after treatment.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Change in walking speed as measured with 10m walking test from before to 4 weeks after treatment.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Change in timed up and go (TUG) test from before to after treatment.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Change in timed up and go (TUG) test from before to 4 weeks after treatment.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Change in tactile sensibility measured with standardized filaments from before to after treatment.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Change in tactile sensibility measured with standardized filaments from before to 4 weeks after treatment.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Time frame: 8 weeks
University Hospital, Geneva
Other
Neurofeedback Training of Alpha-band Coherence After Stroke: a Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02425345
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
View Trial DetailsNCT05589402
Bone Diseases, Brain Diseases
Harlingen, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06750692
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Afyonkarahisar, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04992195
Alzheimer Disease, Arterial Thromboembolism
Hong Kong
View Trial Details