Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Enrolling by Invitation

NCT Number: NCT07085494

Neurofeedback and Cognitive Training for PBTS

Brief Summary of the Study:

This study is a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled, triple-blind trial investigating whether combining individualized alpha neurofeedback (NF) with cognitive training (Cogmed) can improve cognitive functioning in pediatric brain tumor survivors (PBTS), a group at risk for persistent cognitive difficulties after cancer treatment. Participants (ages 6-18) who have completed primary cancer therapy and report cognitive problems are randomly assigned to either (1) individualized alpha NF plus Cogmed or (2) sham NF plus Cogmed. Both interventions include eight one-hour sessions over four weeks, with neurofeedback (real or sham) followed by Cogmed training.

The primary outcome is cognitive performance measured by CNS Vital Signs at baseline, post-intervention, and 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes include attention, executive function, behavior, and quality of life (measured by SWAN, BRIEF, SDQ, and PedsQL). The study uses rigorous double-blinding and intention-to-treat analysis, with sample size planned at 40-60 participants. Results will determine if individualized alpha NF, when combined with cognitive training, yields greater cognitive and behavioral benefits than cognitive training alone in PBTS.

Enrolling by Invitation

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

6 year–18 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Hong Kong Children's Hospital

Hong Kong

About this study

This study is a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind trial designed to evaluate whether individualized alpha neurofeedback (NF) combined with cognitive training (Cogmed) can improve cognitive functioning in pediatric brain tumor survivors (PBTS), who frequently suffer from attention, memory, and executive function difficulties following cancer treatment.

Participants:

The study plans to enroll 40-60 PBTS, aged 6 to 18, who have completed primary cancer treatment at least six months prior and report cognitive difficulties. Major exclusion criteria include severe neurological or psychiatric conditions, interfering medications, and significant sensory or motor deficits.

Design and Intervention:

Participants are randomly assigned (1:1) to one of two groups:

  • Individualized Alpha Neurofeedback + Cogmed (NF Group)
  • Sham Neurofeedback + Cogmed (Sham Group) Both groups participate in eight one-hour sessions over four weeks. Each session includes 30 minutes of neurofeedback (either real, based on each participant's individualized alpha EEG band, or sham, based on pre-recorded EEG data but with identical procedures) followed by 30 minutes of Cogmed cognitive training (adaptive, computerized working memory tasks).

Blinding:

The study is double-blind: both participants and outcome assessors are blinded to group allocation. The neurofeedback software automatically delivers either real or sham feedback according to assignment, maintaining blinding for all involved.

Objectives and Outcome Measures:

The primary objective is to determine whether the combined individualized alpha NF and Cogmed intervention leads to superior improvements in cognitive functioning, measured by CNS Vital Signs, compared to sham NF plus Cogmed. Assessments occur at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at 12-month follow-up.

Secondary objectives include evaluating changes in attention, executive function, behavior, and quality of life, using validated tools such as the SWAN, BRIEF, SDQ, and PedsQL. The study will also examine neurophysiological changes (qEEG markers) and their relationship to cognitive and behavioral outcomes.

Data Analysis:

Primary and secondary outcomes will be analyzed using mixed linear models to assess group-by-time interactions. An intention-to-treat approach will include all randomized participants, with appropriate methods for handling missing data.

Significance:

This study will clarify whether adding individualized alpha neurofeedback to cognitive training offers additional cognitive and behavioral benefits for pediatric brain tumor survivors, compared to cognitive training alone, using a rigorous double-blind, sham-controlled methodology with a planned sample size of 40-60 participants.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • - Paediatric brain tumour survivors aged 6 to 18 years
  • Completion of primary cancer treatment (for example, surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy) at least six months prior
  • Documented or reported cognitive difficulties in attention or executive functioning
  • Ability and willingness to attend scheduled sessions over four weeks

Exclusion criteria

  • - Severe neurological or psychiatric conditions (for example, uncontrolled seizures) that preclude EEG monitoring or completing computer-based training
  • Medication regimens that significantly interfere with EEG signals and cannot be safely adjusted
  • Severe sensory or motor deficits that would make training infeasible
  • Inability or unwillingness to follow study protocol

Treatment and study plan

Neurofeedback

Behavioral
  • Neurofeedback Training : Feedback is based on individualized alpha band power. Participants see a game-like display (for instance, a plane) that reflects their alpha activity. Excessive EMG (muscle tension) causes performance drops, encouraging relaxation.

Cognitive training

Behavioral
  • Cogmed Training : Participants complete adaptive tasks focusing on working memory. The difficulty adjusts in real time based on performance.

Sham feedback

Behavioral

The sham neurofeedback protocol was identical to the verum neurofeedback protocol except that the animation (horizontal plane movement) was based on the EEG results of another participant. EMG-based feedback will still be provided for the sham condition

Primary outcomes

  1. cognitive performance

    Time frame: prior to the intervention, immediate after the interventions & 6 months after the intervention

    cognitive performance as measured by a neurocogntive test battery, CNS VS. the neurocognition Index (NCI) as a compostie score of various cognitive performance will be used

Secondary outcomes

  1. PedsQL (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory)

    Time frame: prior to the intervention, immediate after the intervention & 6 months after the intervention

    The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) is a reliable and validated instrument for assessing health-related quality of life in children and adolescents aged 2-18 years. It consists of 23 items, covering four domains: physical functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning, and school functioning. The PedsQL is designed to measure the impact of various health conditions on children's daily lives and well-being.

  2. SDQ (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire)

    Time frame: prior to the intervention, immediate after the intervention 6 months after the intervention

    The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a brief behavioral screening questionnaire for children and adolescents aged 2-17 years. It consists of 25 items, covering five domains: emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity/inattention, peer relationship problems, and prosocial behavior. The SDQ is designed to help identify mental health problems and promote emotional well-being in children and adolescents.

  3. Strengths and Weaknesses of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Symptoms and Normal Behavior Scale (SWAN)

    Time frame: prior to the intervention, immediate after the interventions & 6 months after the intervention

    The Chinese SWAN is a validated instrument for the assessment of ADHD symptoms in Chinese children in Hong Kong. The SWAN questionnaire was originally devised by Swanson et al in 2005 based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria for ADHD.

  4. Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF)

    Time frame: prior to the intervention, immediate after the intervention & 6 months after the intervention

    A parent/self-report questionnaire evaluating various components of executive functioning in daily life (for example, planning, working memory, and inhibitory control)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

The University of Hong Kong

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial Investigating Individualized Alpha Neurofeedback Plus Cognitive Training in Paediatric Brain Tumour Survivors

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2028
First posted
Jul 25, 2025
Registry last updated
Jan 27, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.