NYU Langone Health
New York, 10016, United States
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06349083
This is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2 mechanistic clinical trial designed to evaluate the therapeutic neural mechanisms of psilocybin in patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD), and to determine whether further studies are warranted to study the relationship of any such effects to clinical improvement in AUD symptoms. The primary aims are to evaluate the effects of psilocybin on AUD; measures will include 1) fMRI neural activation and functional connectivity, using a well-validated task to characterize neural and subjective response to negative affective and alcohol visual stimuli; 2) alcohol use data (self-report and blood biomarkers); and 3) self-report measures related the NE, IS, and EF domains.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
New York, 10016, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
a. Non-English speaking subjects will be excluded because the study is using only validated English-language versions of assessment instruments.
Exclusion criteria
a. Note that any medication prescribed to the participant for AUD is exclusionary, including FDA-approved medications as well those prescribed off-label, such as topiramate, ondansetron, gabapentin, and varenicline.
One 25 mg capsule and one 5 mg capsule (30 mg total) administered once orally
Two matching placebo capsules administered once orally
Participants will receive four supportive therapy sessions of manual-based treatment from two Center for Psychedelic Medicine (CPM) clinicians. The lead clinician will be a licensed physician, clinical psychologist, or nurse practitioner who will be primarily responsible for the content of the intervention. The second therapist will have at least a master's degree or be pursuing a master's or doctoral degree in a related clinical field.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 2
Percentage change in the BOLD signal is the difference in fMRI signal between the baseline condition (B) and the alcohol cue-induced task condition (T); percent signal change = (T-B)/B×100%. A positive value of the percentage change in BOLD signal indicates up-regulation of BOLD signal.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 2
Percentage change in the BOLD signal is the difference in fMRI signal between the baseline condition (B) and the alcohol cue-induced task condition (T); percent signal change = (T-B)/B×100%. A positive value of the percentage change in BOLD signal indicates up-regulation of BOLD signal.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 2
Percentage change in the BOLD signal is the difference in fMRI signal between the baseline condition (B) and the alcohol cue-induced task condition (T); percent signal change = (T-B)/B×100%. A positive value of the percentage change in BOLD signal indicates up-regulation of BOLD signal.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 2
Percentage change in the BOLD signal is the difference in fMRI signal between the baseline condition (B) and the alcohol cue-induced task condition (T); percent signal change = (T-B)/B×100%. A positive value of the percentage change in BOLD signal indicates up-regulation of BOLD signal.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 2
Percentage change in the BOLD signal is the difference in fMRI signal between the baseline condition (B) and the alcohol cue-induced task condition (T); percent signal change = (T-B)/B×100%. A positive value of the percentage change in BOLD signal indicates up-regulation of BOLD signal.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 2
Percentage change in the BOLD signal is the difference in fMRI signal between the baseline condition (B) and the alcohol cue-induced task condition (T); percent signal change = (T-B)/B×100%. A positive value of the percentage change in BOLD signal indicates up-regulation of BOLD signal.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 2
Percentage change in the BOLD signal is the difference in fMRI signal between the baseline condition (B) and the negative affective cue-induced task condition (T); percent signal change = (T-B)/B×100%. A positive value of the percentage change in BOLD signal indicates up-regulation of BOLD signal.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 2
Percentage change in the BOLD signal is the difference in fMRI signal between the baseline condition (B) and the negative affective cue-induced task condition (T); percent signal change = (T-B)/B×100%. A positive value of the percentage change in BOLD signal indicates up-regulation of BOLD signal.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 2
Percentage change in the BOLD signal is the difference in fMRI signal between the baseline condition (B) and the negative affective cue-induced task condition (T); percent signal change = (T-B)/B×100%. A positive value of the percentage change in BOLD signal indicates up-regulation of BOLD signal.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 2
ROI include the ventral striatum, lateral PFC (dlPFC and IFG), and caudate with target clusters in the PFC, ACC, and sensorimotor cortex (S1 and M1).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
ROI include the ventral striatal and amygdala with target clusters in temporal and occipital regions relative to placebo.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
A Go/NoGo task will be used as an objective measure of response inhibition. This task includes alcohol, non-alcohol, and neutral stimuli. The Go/No-go task requires participants to respond by pressing a button when they see a "go" signal, and not respond when they see the "no-go" signal. The key behaviour measured with this experiment is the participants' ability to withhold a response on No-go trials and the frequency of their failed responses.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
The discounting rate is derived from the Delay Discounting Task. Delay discounting tasks provide a measure of the temporal window and examine the devaluation of awards as a function of the delay to the receipt. The task includes 80 items requiring a choice between a delayed reward of $100 and smaller immediate rewards (ranging from $10 to $99, at delays ranging from one to 365 days. Discounting rates will be measured and pre-post differences will be assessed. Higher k values indicate higher impulsive decision-making.
Time frame: IP Administration (Day 0), Week 24
A Foraging Task will be used as an objective measure of cognitive flexibility. The task involves making "stay" or "go" decisions to harvest apples from stylized "trees" that have hidden initial rewards. Within each block, trees have a mean initial reward rate. Subjects decide to either harvest the tree ("stay") or search for a new one ("go"), incurring an S second delay penalty for searching. Harvesting reveals the reward, which depletes by a fixed amount, plus a small error term. After a 1-second inter-trial interval, the tree reappears for another "stay" or "go" choice. Rewards on each sequential trial are computed. Rewards are computed dynamically, with optimal strategies varying based on the delay penalty. The optimal reference point is calculated using the marginal value theorem, while the empirical reference point is the participant's cutoff for searching.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Outcome will be measured using the Timeline Followback (TLFB) interview-based assessment. The TLFB derives subjects' retrospective daily estimates of alcohol consumption patterns. Using a calendar as a visual aid, special events, and other memory cues, subjects are guided through the process of recalling and reporting daily drinking estimates.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
DrInC-2R is a validated self-report questionnaire consisted of 50 questions to measure adverse consequences of alcohol abuse in five areas: Interpersonal, Physical, Social, Impulsive, and Intrapersonal as well as frequency of these consequences (answers given on frequency scale grade from 0-3: 0 - never, 1 - once or a few times, 2 - once or twice a week 3 - daily or almost daily). Higher scores indicate greater levels of alcohol-related problems.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Sleep quality is measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) . The PSQI is a 19-item, self-rated questionnaire designed to measure sleep quality and disturbance over the past month in clinical populations. The 19 items are grouped into 7 components, including (1) sleep duration, (2) sleep disturbance, (3) sleep latency, (4) daytime dysfunction due to sleepiness, (5) sleep efficiency, (6) overall sleep quality, and (7) sleep medication use. Each of the sleep components yields a score ranging from 0 to 3, with 3 indicating the greatest dysfunction.
Adding up the average scores of the seven factors gives a global PSQI score from 0 to 21, with 0-4 indicating "good" sleep and 5-21 indicating "poor" sleep.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a validated 36 item self-report Quality of Life Questionnaire that measures eight multi-item dimensions of health: physical functioning, social functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, role limitations due to emotional problems, mental health, energy/vitality, pain, and general health perception. Scores range from 0 - 100. Lower scores = more disability, higher scores = less disability
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
The alcohol cravings score will be assessed using the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS). The PACS consists of 5 questions with sub-scales ranging from 0 (never) to 6 (nearly all of the time). Scores greater than 20 were considered to meet diagnostic criteria for craving for a diagnosis of Alcohol Use Disorder.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Negative affect will be assessed using the negative affect scale of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) which is a 10-item measure of negative emotions on a scale of 1 ("very slightly or not at all) to 5 ("extremely"). Total scores can range from 10 - 50, with higher scores representing higher levels of NA and reflect a dimension of general distress summarizing a variety of negative states such as anger, guilt, or anxiety.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Impulsivity will be assessed using the Barratt impulsivity scale (BIS-11), a validated self-report questionnaire composed of 30 items describing common impulsive or non-impulsive (for reverse scored items) behaviors and preferences. Items are scored on a 4-point scale: Rarely/Never = 1, Occasionally = 2, Often = 3, Almost Always/Always = 4. Total score is assessed. The total scores can range from 30 to 120. The higher total score corresponds to the more impulsive behavior
Time frame: IP Administration (Day 0), Week 24
Outcome will be measured using the Timeline Followback (TLFB) interview-based assessment. The TLFB derives subjects' retrospective daily estimates of alcohol consumption patterns. Using a calendar as a visual aid, special events, and other memory cues, subjects are guided through the process of recalling and reporting daily drinking estimates.
Time frame: IP Administration (Day 0), Week 24
Outcome will be measured using the Timeline Followback (TLFB) interview-based assessment. The TLFB derives subjects' retrospective daily estimates of alcohol consumption patterns. Using a calendar as a visual aid, special events, and other memory cues, subjects are guided through the process of recalling and reporting daily drinking estimates.
Time frame: IP Administration (Day 0), Week 24
Outcome will be measured using the Timeline Followback (TLFB) interview-based assessment. The TLFB derives subjects' retrospective daily estimates of alcohol consumption patterns. Using a calendar as a visual aid, special events, and other memory cues, subjects are guided through the process of recalling and reporting daily drinking estimates.
Time frame: IP Administration (Day 0), Week 24
Outcome will be measured using the Timeline Followback (TLFB) interview-based assessment. The TLFB derives subjects' retrospective daily estimates of alcohol consumption patterns. Using a calendar as a visual aid, special events, and other memory cues, subjects are guided through the process of recalling and reporting daily drinking estimates.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Outcome will be measured using the Timeline Followback (TLFB) interview-based assessment. The TLFB derives subjects' retrospective daily estimates of alcohol consumption patterns. Using a calendar as a visual aid, special events, and other memory cues, subjects are guided through the process of recalling and reporting daily drinking estimates. These daily drinking estimates will then be used to categorize participants' risk drinking levels based on WHO criteria, which are based on grams of pure ethanol consumed per day.
Time frame: IP Administration (Day 0), Week 24
Probability of having no drinking days from the day of IP administration to the Week 24 follow-up will be calculated using a likely responder analysis. Candidate predictors will include fMRI-derived neural metrics (activation and functional connectivity), clinical features, neuropsychological measures, self-report questionnaires, and outcome expectancies. The LR approach uses a prognostic score, a model of the outcome as a function of pre-treatment variables within the treatment group, to predict each participant's potential response under the treatment.
Time frame: IP Administration (Day 0), Week 24
Probability of having no heavy drinking days from the day of IP administration to the Week 24 follow-up will be calculated using a likely responder analysis. Candidate predictors will include fMRI-derived neural metrics (activation and functional connectivity), clinical features, neuropsychological measures, self-report questionnaires, and outcome expectancies. The LR approach uses a prognostic score, a model of the outcome as a function of pre-treatment variables within the treatment group, to predict each participant's potential response under the treatment.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Michael Bogenschutz, MD
CONTACT
Quincey Pyatt
CONTACT
NYU Langone Health
Other
Neurobehavioral Mechanisms of Psilocybin-assisted Treatment for Alcohol Use Disorder
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06860607
Alcohol Use Disorder, Alcohol-Related Disorders
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07191561
Alcohol Use Disorder, Alcohol-Related Disorders
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07178990
Alcohol Use Disorder, Alcohol-Related Disorders
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06985927
Alcohol Use Disorder, Alcohol-Related Disorders
Reims, France
View Trial Details