Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01478854

Neural Progenitor Cell Sparing Radiation Therapy Plus Temozolomide

The long term goal of this research is to establish whether NPC sparing RT techniques improve neurocognitive outcomes compared to conventional RT for brain tumors. If the proposed study demonstrates that NPC sparing RT is not associated with increased LR in the spared regions of the brain compared to conventional RT, it will ideally serve as the foundation for a future multi-institutional randomized controlled trial comparing neurocognitive outcomes in patients treated with NPC-sparing RT versus conventional radiation therapy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins

Baltimore, Maryland, 21231, United States

About this study

Radiation therapy (RT) is an integral component of the management of brain tumors, but cognitive deficits following cranial irradiation are well documented. There is an association between damage to neural progenitor cells (NPC) and neurocognitive dysfunction. NPC are similarly known to play an important role in recovery from damage to the brain, including radiation-induced damage. However NPC are extremely sensitive to radiation. In spite of this information, current RT planning techniques do not limit the radiation dose to the NPC containing regions. Recent human studies have demonstrated that it is possible to use intensity modulated radiation therapy to reduce the radiation dose to NPC containing regions during RT for brain tumors, without compromising coverage of the tumor. We hypothesize that NPC-sparing RT will reduce neurocognitive decline following treatment for brain tumors, without compromising tumor local control. However, there is conflicting data regarding the role of NPC in the development of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Some studies suggest that GBM are derived from NPC whereas others have associated NPC with improved tumor control following therapy for GBM. Prior to evaluation of neurocognitive outcomes with NPC-sparing RT, it is therefore imperative to evaluate whether NPC-sparing RT techniques lead to increased LR in the spared NPC containing niches of the brain.

The proposed study is designed to evaluate LR in the spared regions of the brain following NPC sparing RT in patients with newly diagnosed GBM. Our research will consist of 3 specific aims: 1) Determine the LR rate at 1 year in the spared NPC containing niches in patients treated with NPC sparing RT for GBM; 2) Quantify the extent of radiation dose sparing to the NPC containing regions that is possible without compromising tumor coverage in patients with GBM; 3) Determine if it is feasible to evaluate cognitive function prospectively in patients undergoing NPC sparing RT for GBM.

The long term goal of this research is to establish whether NPC sparing RT techniques improve neurocognitive outcomes compared to conventional RT for brain tumors. If the proposed study demonstrates that NPC sparing RT is not associated with increased LR in the spared regions of the brain compared to conventional RT, it will ideally serve as the foundation for a future multi-institutional randomized controlled trial comparing neurocognitive outcomes in patients treated with NPC-sparing RT versus conventional radiation therapy.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient must have newly diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM).
  • Patient must have undergone surgical resection and must begin radiation within 12 weeks of this procedure.
  • Patients must not have received previous irradiation to the brain.
  • Patient must be at least 18 years of age
  • Karnofsky performance status of greater than 60%
  • Patient must receive temozolomide concurrent with and following radiation.
  • If a woman is of child-bearing potential, a negative urine or serum pregnancy test must be demonstrated prior to treatment. Women of childbearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception for the duration of study participation and for up to 12 weeks following the study. Should a women become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study she should inform her treating physician immediately.
  • Patient must have the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
  • All patients must be informed of the investigational nature of this study and must be given written informed consent in accordance with institutional and federal guidelines.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients may not be receiving any other agents to treat their GBM
  • No prior malignancy except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, cervical carcinoma in situ, or other cancer from which the patient has been disease free for at least 2 years.
  • Patients with any other uncontrolled illness will be excluded.
  • Pregnant and breastfeeding women are excluded. Women of child-bearing potential who are unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method of birth control to avoid pregnancy for the entire study period and up to 12 weeks after the study are excluded. This applies to any woman who has not experienced menarche and who has not undergone successful surgical sterilization or is not postmenopausal (defined as amenorrhea for at least 12 consecutive months). Male subjects must also agree to use effective contraception for the same period as above.

Treatment and study plan

Radiation

Radiation

Patients will be treated to a total dose of 60 Gy with a once daily fractionation schedule of 2 Gy per fraction, administered five days per week. All patients will undergo CT simulation with intravenous contrast. In addition they will undergo MRI simulation with both T1 with gadolinium as well as FLAIR sequences. They will be treated in a supine position using an aquaplast mask system for immobilization. CT image data will be reconstructed in approximately 3 mm slice thickness and manually coregistered with T1 post-gadolinium and FLAIR sequence MRI.

Chemotherapy

Drug

Temozolomide

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Local Recurrence in the Spared NPC Niches

    Time frame: 1 year

    Number of participants with local recurrence (LR) at 1 year in the spared neural progenitor cell (NPC) containing niches of the brain in patients treated with NPC sparing radiation therapy (RT) plus temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Local recurrence in spared area is defined as development of a new regions of T1 post gadolinium enhancement.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Extent of NPC Sparing

    Time frame: 1 year

    The extent of NPC-sparing will be recorded for each patient. Patients will be binned into 4 groups according to the volume of NPC region that receives a certain dose as follows: 1) V5Gy≤50%; 2) V5Gy ≤20%; 3) V10Gy≤20%; 4) Doses higher than levels 1-3.

  2. Distance of Tumor to Spared NPC Niches

    Time frame: 1 year

    The X-, Y-, and Z- coordinate distances in centimeters will be recorded from the most proximal point of the planning tumor volume to the closest point of the spared NPC-containing niche.

  3. Change in Neurocognitive Function as Measured by Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) Coding Subtest

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months

    Change in mean score of neurocognitive function (processing speed) as measured by WAIS-IV (Coding subtest) in patients treated with NPC sparing radiation for newly diagnosed GBM. The coding subtest of WAIS-IV is a visual, paper and pencil task that requires individuals to match numbers with symbols based on a "key" at the top of the page (Coding) by drawing the correct symbol in the boxes provided. Coding measures visual processing speed, short-term visual memory, and the ability to shift the eyes efficiently back and forth between the "key" and the responses. This task requires fine motor skills (using a pencil) but does not require expressive language. Minimal demands are placed on receptive language. This task also assesses the ability to sustain focus and effort for a two minutes. The score is the total number of correct responses within a given time frame, which ranges from 0-135. A higher score reflects a better outcome. A negative value for change reflects a worse outcome.

  4. Change in Neurocognitive Function as Measured by Trail Making Test

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months

    Change in mean score of neurocognitive function as measured by Trail Making test Parts A and B in patients treated with NPC sparing radiation for newly diagnosed GBM. The Trail making score is the number of seconds spent connecting numbered circles (1-13) to circles containing letters of the alphabet (A-L) in alternating sequential order. Score ranges from 0-150 for Part A and 0-300 for Part B. A higher score reflects greater neurocognitive impairment. Therefore, a negative value for change reflects an improvement in this measure, whereas a positive value reflects worsening impairment.

  5. Change in Neurocognitive Function (Verbal Fluency) as Measured by Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT)

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months

    Change in neurocognitive function (verbal fluency) as measured by COWAT in patients treated with NPC sparing radiation for newly diagnosed GBM. COWAT assesses verbal fluency by asking the participant to produce words for three designated letters. The test score is the total number of different words produced for all three letters. A higher score reflects a better outcome. Therefore, a positive value for change reflects an improvement in this measure.

  6. Change in Neurocognitive Function (Total Recall, Delayed Recall, Recognition Discrimination) as Measured by Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R)

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months

    Change in total recall, delayed recall, and recognition discrimination index as measured by HVLT-R in patients treated with NPC sparing radiation for newly diagnosed GBM. 12-item word list, composed of four words from each of the three semantic categories which the patient must learn over three trials. For each trial, the subject is instructed to listen carefully as the examiner reads the word list and attempt to memorize the words. The score for total recall is the sum of all the correctly-recalled words from each trial, for a maximum of 36. Delayed recall is assessed as the number of words freely recalled 20-25 minutes after the learning trials. Recognition is assessed after 20-25 minutes where the patient is read 24 words and is asked to say "yes" after words from the recall list (12 targets) and "no" after other words (12 distractors). RDI is the number of recalled target words minus the number of recalled distractor words. A higher score reflects a better outcome.

  7. Radiation Dose to Spared NPC Region

    Time frame: Day 1 of radiation therapy

    The mean radiation dose (cGy) to spared NPC region (hippocampus, subventricular zone [SVZ]) in reference to site of lesion.

  8. Volume (cc) of "NPC for Sparing" Region

    Time frame: day 1 of radiation therapy

    The volume of the "NPC_for_sparing" region as collected using the Pinnacle treatment planning system.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective Trial of Neural Progenitor Cell Sparing Radiation Therapy Plus Temozolomide for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Nov 23, 2011
Registry last updated
Jun 13, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.