Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06065384

Neural Plasticity and Motor Recovery After Upper Extremity Motor Training in People With c-SCI

After spinal cord injury (SCI), there is a disruption in neural circuits resulting in paralysis. There is not yet a cure for paralysis. In persons with Cervical SCI (pwC-SCI) recovery of arm-hand function is very important as it has a significant impact on the patients' level of independence and quality of life. Recovery is assumed to involve alterations in both central and peripheral motor systems. Motor training at an intensive dosage potentially provides a powerful stimulus for neurological recovery. This project exploits the peripheral and central neuroplastic effect of an early (<13 weeks after injury) and intensive (8 weeks of 6 hours in addition to usual care) upper limb motor training program (EIUMT) directed at recovery below the level of the injury in pwC-SCI within an international multi-center randomized controlled trial including 44 pwC-SCI. It has 4 objectives: to investigate 1)central neural plasticity by identifying alterations in cortical neuroplasticity and corticospinal excitability; 2)peripheral neural plasticity by identifying alterations in axonal excitability and number of motor units; 3)behavioral motor recovery of upper limb and 4)relationships between dose dimensions of motor intervention and behavioral and neurophysiological outcome measures after EIUMT. Cutting-edge neurophysiological measures are used to provide insight in the mechanism of neuroplasticity after EIUMT and will be taken before and after EIUMT and at 6 months follow-up.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

16 year–90 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Revalidatieziekenhuis RevArte, Antwerp, Belgium

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Background of the study:

Paralysis or paralysis is the most common effect of spinal cord injury (SCI) on individuals. Paralysis affects the ability to walk, perform self-care, live independently and participate in work and leisure activities. In individuals with cervical spinal cord injury, arm and hand function is very important. The most promising and easily implemented intervention that could promote neurological recovery and make a lasting difference in the lives of people with spinal cord injuries is early and intensive motor training aimed at recovery below the injury level. This intervention takes advantage of the early plasticity of the nervous system. By maximizing muscle activation in the first few weeks after injury, we can target the nervous system's unique capacity for neural plasticity where changes can occur in central and peripheral motor systems.

Objective of the study:

This project aims to investigate peripheral and central neuroplasticity following an early (<13 weeks after injury) and intensive (8 weeks of 6 hours of additional therapy) upper extremity motor training program (EIUMT) aimed at recovery below the lesion level. This project has 4 objectives: to investigate 1) central neural plasticity (identify changes in cortical neuroplasticity and corticospinal excitability; 2) peripheral neural plasticity (identify change in axonal excitability and number of motor units); 3) clinical motor recovery of the upper limbs and 4) relationships between dose dimensions of motor intervention and clinical and neurophysiological outcome measures after EIUMT. Advanced neurophysiological measurements and clinical measurements will be taken before and after EIUMT and at 6-month follow-up.

Study design:

a multicenter pragmatic randomised controlled study in 2 countries

Study population:

44 persons with cervical spinal cord injury (22 participants in the control and intervention groups) Inclusion criteria: Individuals are eligible to participate if they have suffered a traumatic or non-traumatic cervical spinal cord injury within the previous 13 weeks, have AIS (ASIA Impairment Scale) A lesion with motor function more than three levels below motor level (on one or both sides) or have AIS C or AIS D lesion (as defined by the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of spinal cord injury), are older than 16 years of age, have received permission to begin rehabilitation and are likely to remain an inpatient for the next 8 weeks.

Exclusion criteria

Participants will be excluded if they have a significant medical or physical condition or psychiatric illness that could prevent the person from participating in the study or would place the person at unacceptable risk if they were to participate.

Intervention:

The intervention group receives 6 hours of motor training each week. This involves active and targeted motor training of all affected muscles below the injury level in the context of functional activities.

The control group receives only standard rehabilitation and care.

Primary study parameters/outcome of the study (Baseline vs 8 weeks after randomisation):

Central plasticity via: Single pulse TMS (transcranial magnetic stimulation) (Resting Motor Threshold) Peripheral plasticity via: Peripheral nerve assessment (Compound muscle action potential (CMAP)) Functional recovery via: Grades redefined assessment of strength, sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP)

Secondary study parameters/outcome of the study:

Clinical Measures: Upper Extremity Motor Score, Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SClM-selfcare); Van Lieshout Test (VLT); Hand-Held Dynamometry; accelerometry (session density: active therapy time/session length); perceived difficulty and exertion) Central plasticity: Single Pulse TMS: Stimulus-Response Function, Cortical mapping, Paired pulse TMS: SICI (short interval intracortical inhibition); LICI (long interval intracortical inhibition) Peripheral plasticity: NET (Nerve excitability testing) and MScanFit MUNE.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Traumatic or non-traumatic C-SCI in the preceding 13 weeks; age over 16 years; have an incomplete SCI categorized as AIS C or D or an AIS A SCI with zones of partial motor paralysis (as defined by the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCI) and medically stable.

Exclusion criteria

  • SCI with ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) A without zones of partial preservation (decided based on former studies) and expertise of the team; SCI with any significant medical condition that could prevent the person from participating. Patients will be excluded from the measures of central plasticity in the presence of contraindications for TMS application such as epilepsy, metal implants in the brain, defibrillator, pacemaker, and pregnancy

Treatment and study plan

experimental group: intensive motor training

Other

Intervention group: receive an extra 6 hours of motor training each week (distributed over the week) for 8 weeks. It will involve active and targeted motor training of all affected muscles of the upper limb below the level of the injury within the context of practice of functional activities. Interventions will be goal directed and individualized to the needs of each participant with a focus on training that addresses each person's specific motor problem, promoting motor learning as well as stimulating neural plasticity. All patients will continue to receive usual physiotherapy and usual rehabilitation.

Usual Care

Other

usual rehabilitation

Primary outcomes

  1. changes in single pulse TMS: resting motor threshold

    Time frame: - before intervention; at 4 weeks (inbetween measure), at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up

    to asses changes in cortical reactivity

  2. Changes in Compound Muscle Action Potential (CMAP)

    Time frame: - before intervention; at 4 weeks (inbetween measure), at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up

    Changes in amplitude of CMAP

  3. changes in GRASSP

    Time frame: - before intervention; at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up

    Grades redefined assessment of strength sensibility and Prehension

Secondary outcomes

  1. Single-pulse TMS: Stimulus Response Curve

    Time frame: - before intervention; at 4 weeks (inbetween measure), at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up

    • to assess cortical excitability
  2. changes SICI

    Time frame: - before intervention; at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up

    to evaluatie changes in Short interval intracortical inhibition

  3. changes in LICI

    Time frame: - before intervention; at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up

    long-interval intracortical inhibition

  4. changes in MscanFit MUNE

    Time frame: - before intervention; at 4 weeks (inbetween measure), at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up

    Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) scans will be recorded

  5. changes in single pulse TMS: mapping

    Time frame: - before intervention; at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up

    to evaluate changes in cortical reorganisation

  6. changes in NET (Nerve excitability testing)

    Time frame: - before intervention; at 4 weeks (inbetween measure), at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up

    Stimulus-Response Curve, Strength duration time constant (SDTC), threshold electrotonus (TE), I/V relationship (I/V) and recovery cycles (RC) will be measured.

  7. changes in behavioral measures: Upper extremity motor score

    Time frame: - before intervention; at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up

    score on 50

  8. changes in Spinal Cord independence Measures

    Time frame: - before intervention; at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up

    questionaire: self-care score

  9. changes in Van Lieshout Test

    Time frame: - before intervention; at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up

    basis upper extremity skills

  10. changes in hand held dynamometry

    Time frame: - before intervention; at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up

    strength in hand

  11. Goal satisfaction

    Time frame: - before intervention; at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up

    Subjective scoring 0-10 of four goals

Other outcomes

  1. Subjectively perceived session difficulty

    Time frame: measurement of one week during the 2., 5. and 8. week of intervention duration; before and after completion of session

    VAS

  2. Objective active time

    Time frame: - measurement of one week during the 2., 5. and 8. week of intervention duration

    accelerometry

  3. Subjectively perceived session intensity

    Time frame: measurement of one week during the 2., 5. and 8. week of intervention duration; before and after completion of session

    VAS (perceived exertion)

  4. Therapy documentation

    Time frame: whole trial period of 8 weeks

    Total session length and UL training session length based on therapy documentation

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Annemie Spooren, Prof. Dr.

CONTACT

[email protected]

11269332

Lisa Tedesco Triccas, Prof. Dr.

CONTACT

[email protected]

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Annemie Spooren

Other

Collaborators

  • Adelante, Centre of Expertise in Rehabilitation and Audiology
  • Rehabilitation Hospital RevArte
  • Research Foundation Flanders
  • Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
  • University Hospital, Ghent
  • University of Aarhus
  • University of Sydney

Registry information

Official study title

Central and Peripheral Neuroplasticity in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Following Intensive Upper Limb Motor Training

Acronym: REPAIR-SCI

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Oct 3, 2023
Registry last updated
Dec 12, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.