UC San Diego
La Jolla, California, 92093, United States
NCT Number: NCT07003802
Low back pain (LBP) is a condition that affects a majority of the US population and is responsible for a significant proportion of health care costs and utilization. Lumbar spine muscle is compromised in LBP, and do, and do not, respond to exercise based physical therapy program depending on measurements representing activation capacity of lumbar muscle. Here, we will characterize the neurological and muscle specific features that may contribute to limited activation in an attempt to identify sources of resistance to recovery in patients with chronic disc injury and identify precision rehabilitation approaches for this complex population of individuals.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
La Jolla, California, 92093, United States
Low back pain (LBP) is a complex condition that affects 65-85% of the population, and is the leading musculoskeletal condition contributing to disability in the United States. Disc injury is the most common injury and 75% of individuals undergoing surgical and rehabilitative interventions for this condition experience suboptimal or poor outcomes. These patients demonstrate disability and deficits in functional capacity, and paraspinal muscles in these individuals have been shown to be altered in volume, composition, and mechanical properties. These maladaptive changes influence the ability for the muscle to respond appropriately to rehabilitation efforts in a subgroup of individuals with chronic back pain who do not demonstrate the expected acute activation responses to exercise. While the structural and adaptive capacities of healthy muscle are well understood, pathological muscle recovery and activation deficits are less clear and may be influenced by neurogenic and/or muscle specific impairments. To address this gap in knowledge, the purpose of this trial is to compare central and peripheral origins of impaired activation in individuals with chronic disc injury who do, and do not respond to exercise. Experiment 1 will use a novel functional MRI technique and electromyographic measurements to compare responder and non-responder groups in patients with chronic lumbar disc injury undergoing standard physical therapy. Experiment 2 will compare corticomotor excitability and intracortical inhibition and facilitation between individuals who are undergoing physical therapy or surgery who do and do not respond to exercise. Experiment 3 will compare ex vivo passive and active mechanical responses, and transcriptomics from intraoperative multifidus biopsies of patients undergoing spinal surgery for chronic lumbar disc injury to evaluate muscle mechanotransduction. These experiments will elucidate the neurogenic and muscle-specific contributions to muscle adaptation in the presence of chronic lumbar spine pathology and pain.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Physical Therapy Group-
Healthy Control group -
Exclusion criteria
An acute bout of a 3 minute resistance exercise will be performed using a lumbar extension exercise machine
Time frame: Baseline
Average RMS EMG amplitude of the lumbar multifidus over the duration of the acute exercise bout.
Time frame: Baseline
Response classification from IVIM MRI imaging as an increase in IVIM Diffusion (D) of at least 0.055 x 10-3 mm2/s and a pseudodiffusion (D*) increase of at least 6.94 x 10-3 mm2/s in response to the acute exercise stimulus
Time frame: Baseline
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation based motor threshold of activation of the lumbar multifidus muscle
Time frame: Time of surgery/biopsy
Mechanically-induced phosphorylation of p38 MAPK-Thr180/Tyr182 (p-p38T180/Y182) from intraoperative multifidus biopsies or biopsy needle
Time frame: Baseline
Motor evoked potential of multifidus in response to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the motor cortex
Time frame: Baseline
Period of motor silence in the multifidus after Transcrianial Magnetic Simulation MEP over the motor cortex
Time frame: Baseline
Measurement of signal loss in the multifidus after a paired pulse stimulation of the motor cortex using transcranial magnetic stimulation
Time frame: Baseline
Measurement of time of multifidus muscle activation after a paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex
Time frame: Time of surgery/biopsy
Structural Proteins and phosphorylation of p-mTORS2448/total mTOR measured from intraoperative multifidus biopsies or biopsy needle
University of California, San Diego
Other
The Contributions of Neural Control and Mechanosensation to Rehabilitation Induced Spine Muscle Recovery
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07031947
Back Pain, Core Stabilization Exercise Therapy
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05493891
Back Pain, Low Back Pain
Qina, Qena Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05745129
Back Pain, Bone Diseases
Oslo, Norge, Norway
View Trial DetailsNCT07674407
Back Pain, Bone Diseases
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details