Script Intervention
BehavioralThis intervention provides language to participants to allow them to discuss kidney transplantation with their social network.
NCT Number: NCT05255757
For this current phase of the larger project, the investigators will survey transplant candidates as well as the participants family and friends to understand the barriers to volunteering and evaluation. This project will examine how network characteristics are associated with eventual living donor kidney transplant outcomes and test the efficacy of evidence-based interventions designed to assist kidney transplant candidates in participant donor search on a multi-center scale.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
The overall goal is to understand the process and assist participants who do not receive unsolicited offers to be evaluated as a living kidney donor in initiating and effectively conducting these critical conversations with participants kin and friends. In the search intervention, based on what they can tell investigators about the number, type, perceived health, perceived relationship, and potential willingness to donate, as well as analyses of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) investigators will counsel them on which members of participants family and friendship networks appear most biomedically promising as donors among the subset of these individuals that participants have not ruled out for known medical or perceived relationship reasons. In the rhetorical intervention, investigators will test non-coercive, promising verbal scripts that have proven promising in preliminary tests in vignette experiments in online and phone surveys.
AIM 1: Survey transplant candidates about their social network and transplant-related attitudes, knowledge, and characteristics; and randomize participants into one of two interventions or a control group.
AIM 2: Send network member participants a survey that measures potential donor attributes that are hypothesized to influence donation decisions, such as medical contraindications, blood type, health insurance status, and barriers to living donation.
AIM 3: Test whether participant social networks and interventions affect donation outcomes using medical records and follow-ups provided by Penn and UAB. Investigators will create the first predictive model of potential donor evaluation and actual donation. This information is critical to improve clinical practice and efforts to ethically influence the living donor search process.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
This intervention provides language to participants to allow them to discuss kidney transplantation with their social network.
This group will complete the candidate survey, refer members of their family and social network for participation in a web survey, and be given information about the statistical likelihood that each member of their social network will be free of contraindications for living kidney donation.
Time frame: up to 3 years
Living donor kidney transplant received by patient
Time frame: up to 3 years
Deceased donor kidney transplant received by patient
Time frame: up to 3 years
Patient died during the follow-up period
Time frame: up to 3 years
Number of completed living kidney donation screening questionnaires completed for patient
Time frame: up to 3 years
Number of completed living kidney donor screening that received preliminary approval for patient
Time frame: up to 3 years
Number of living kidney donor evaluations completed for patient
Time frame: up to 3 years
Number of completed living kidney donor evaluations that resulted in approved living kidney donor candidacy for patient
Time frame: Immediate
A set of survey questions asked both before and after the intervention, to assess intermediate attitude outcomes regarding preference for living kidney donor
Time frame: Immediate
A set of survey questions asked both before and after the intervention, to assess intermediate attitude outcomes regarding concerns for living kidney donation
Time frame: Immediate
A set of survey questions asked both before and after the intervention, to assess intermediate attitude outcomes regarding living donor kidney transplant willingness
Time frame: Immediate
Respondent is asked to rate their level of knowledge related to kidney transplantation.
Time frame: Immediate
Respondent is asked to rate their trust in medical institutions.
Time frame: Immediate
Respondent is asked how strongly they agree that their religious views affect their willingness to pursue a kidney transplant.
Penn State University
Other
Social Network Interventions to Reduce Race Disparities in Living Kidney Donation
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07518628
Behavior, Chronic Disease
Nicosia, Cyprus
View Trial DetailsNCT05154773
Chronic Disease, Chronic Kidney Diseases
Buffalo, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04466865
Behavior, Chronic Disease
Denver, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04395131
Chronic Disease, Disease Attributes
Düsseldorf, Germany
View Trial Details