Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02773407

Nepal Undifferentiated Febrile Illness Trial

The purpose of the study is to determine whether azithromycin or cotrimoxazole is the best empirical treatment for undifferentiated febrile illness in Nepal

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

2 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Nepal Civil Service Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Fever is one of the most common presenting symptoms of patients presenting to health centers in Nepal. Many of the times, it is difficult to diagnose the cause of the fever by initial history, clinical examination and basic laboratory tests and the patents are treated as presumed enteric fever or fever without focus needing antimicrobials. In fact there are various causes of similarly presenting febrile illnesses including typhoid, paratyphoid, murine typhus, scrub typhus etc.

Many of the traditionally used drugs including fluoroquinolones are now resistant against enteric fever in south asia. Oral azithromycin is now commonly used to treat undifferentiated febrile illness and remains effective against enteric fever. Many physicians now also use co-trimoxazole as it was very commonly used in the treatment of enteric fever in the past. Resistance to co-trimoxazole emerged two decades ago, but has subsequently largely disappeared and nearly all Salmonella Typhi and Paratyphi A strains from Nepal are now susceptible. Anecdotal reports claim that it seems to work very well against undifferentiated febrile illness in Nepal; it is largely stocked in government health facilities and is a popular and cheap treatment option.

Both azithromycin and co-trimoxazole are available in Nepal and are extensively used in the treatment of undifferentiated febrile illness. Therefore it is important to know the better oral option to treat enteric fever and other febrile illnesses and also to have an alternative oral treatment in case resistance to azithromycin emerges.

The investigators purpose to conduct a head to head, parallel group, 1:1, double blinded randomized controlled trial to compare azithromycin and co-trimoxazole for the treatment of undifferentiated febrile illness and determine the best empirical treatment for undifferentiated febrile illness in Nepal.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Fever of ≥ 38.0°C and for ≥4 days without a focus of infection
  • ≥ 2 years and <65 years of age
  • Able to take tablets orally
  • Patient residing in Kathmandu Valley
  • Able to come for follow up
  • Can be reached by telephone/mobile phone 24 hours a day.
  • Written informed consent to participate in the study including assent for minors in addition to parental consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Fever >14 days
  • Pregnancy
  • Obtundation
  • Shock
  • Visible jaundice
  • Presence of signs of gastrointestinal bleeding
  • History of hypersensitivity to either of the trial drugs
  • Patient requiring intravenous antibiotic or hospital admission for any reason.
  • Contraindication of drug for any reason (e.g. drug interactions).
  • Any patient fulfilling inclusion criteria but already on antimicrobials and responding clinically to the treatment

Treatment and study plan

Azithromycin

Drug

co-trimoxazole

Drug

Primary outcomes

  1. Fever clearance time

    Time frame: at least 2 days

    time from the first dose of a study drug until a temperature ≤37.5°C for at least 2 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fever failure

    Time frame: over 7 days post treatment initiation

    defined by fever clearance time (FCT) >7 days post treatment initiation;

  2. Need rescue treatment

    Time frame: within 63 days

    Requirement for rescue treatment as judged by the Research Medical Officer (RMO) and Attending Physician (AP)

  3. Microbiological failure

    Time frame: on day 7 of treatment

    Blood culture positivity for S. Typhi or an S. Paratyphi

  4. Relapse

    Time frame: within 28 days of initiation of treatment

    Culture-confirmed or syndromic enteric fever relapse

  5. The development of any complication

    Time frame: within 28 days of initiation of treatment

    any complication: e.g. clinically significant bleeding, fall in the Glasgow Coma Score, perforation of the gastrointestinal tract and hospital admission

  6. Time-to-treatment failure

    Time frame: within 63 days

    the time from the first dose of treatment until the date of the earliest failure event

  7. Adverse events

    Time frame: within 63 days

    grade 3/4 adverse events, serious adverse events, adverse events of any grade leading to modification of study drug dose or interruption/early discontinuation

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Vietnam

Other

Collaborators

  • University of Oxford
  • Wellcome Trust

Registry information

Official study title

Parallel Group, Double Blinded, 1:1, Randomized Controlled Phase III Trial of Co-trimoxazole Versus Azithromycin for the Treatment of Undifferentiated Fever In Nepal

Acronym: NUFIT

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
May 16, 2016
Registry last updated
Dec 6, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.