Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT04261244

NeoRad Breast Cancer Study

The NEORAD trial tests whether preoperative radiotherapy results in an improved DFS and less radiation induced late effect compared to postoperative radiotherapy in higher risk breast cancer after NACT.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

St. Marien-Krankenhaus Ahaus, Ahaus, Germany

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The standard of care for high-risk breast cancer consists of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery followed by postoperative whole breast/chest wall irradiation+/- an additional boost (= irradiation restricted to the tumour bed in the case of breast-conserving therapy). In case of lymph node involvement in most patients require additional radiation of the regional lymph nodes. Adjuvant radiotherapy significantly reduces ipsilateral breast cancer recurrences, breast cancer specific mortality, and overall mortality. The optimal time of radiotherapy in patients, who are candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has never been addressed in a randomised controlled trial.

The Study Chairman of the NEORAD trial is Prof. Dr. med. Christiane Matuschek. The deputies of the Study Chairman are Prof. Dr. med. Wilfried Budach and Prof. Dr. med. Tanja Fehm.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Histologically proven invasive, unilateral breast cancer
  • Indication for radiotherapy
  • Indication for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (+/- antibody treatment or other targeted therapies) in accordance with national and international guidelines
  • Female
  • Informed consent for the trial signed by the patient
  • Hormone receptor and HER2 status: no restrictions
  • All grades G1-G3
  • Age ≥ 18 years at the time of informed consent
  • Performance status ≤ 2
  • No pre-existing conditions that prohibit therapy

Exclusion criteria

  • Neoadjuvant treatment solely with endocrine therapy
  • Bilateral breast cancer
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Prior radiotherapy of the thorax
  • Connective tissue disease, including rheumatoid arthritis and thromboangiitis obliterans
  • Pre-existing symptomatic chronic lung disease (fibrosis, pneumoconiosis, adult-onset allergies, such as farmer's lung, severe lung emphysema, COPD °III)
  • Cardiac comorbidities: symptomatic coronary heart disease, prior heart attack, heart failure NYHA ≥II or AHA ≥C, pacemaker, and/or implanted defibrillator
  • Malignoma except basalioma or in-situ-carcinomas in complete response
  • Distant metastasis
  • Plexopathies of the arm of the treated side
  • Stiffness of the shoulder of the arm of the side of the breast cancer of any origin (e.g. following a road accident)
  • Lymph edema ≥°II of the arm at the side of the breast cancer
  • Other medical conditions that prohibit the neoadjuvant radiotherapy (i.e. Expected non-compliance, etc.)
  • Male patients
  • Patients who have previously been assessed for chemotherapy response

Treatment and study plan

preoperative radiotherapy

Radiation

preoperative radiotherapy instead of postoperative radiotherapy in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Postoperative Radiotherapy

Radiation

postoperative radiotherapy in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Primary outcomes

  1. disease free survival (DFS):

    Time frame: 6 to 10 years

    Time interval in which the patient does not show any signs or symptoms of the treated cancer (local or regional recurrence, distant metastases, or death of any cause) beginning after randomisation to a study arm.

    This is a way to measure how well the new treatment is working.

Secondary outcomes

  1. local recurrence rate [in affected breast] (LR)

    Time frame: 6 to 10 years

    Rate of cancer that has recurred at the same location as the primary cancer. This is a way to measure how well the new treatment is working.

  2. locoregional recurrence rate (LRR)

    Time frame: 6 to 10 years

    Rate of new cancer at any locations (regional lymph nodes, chest wall/mastectomy site) on side which was previously affected by the primary cancer.

    This is a way to measure how well the new treatment is working.

  3. disease metastases free survival (DMFS)

    Time frame: 6 to 10 years

    Time interval beginning after randomisation in which the patient survives and the cancer has not metastasized.

    This is a way to measure how well the new treatment is working.

  4. overall survival (OS)

    Time frame: 6 to 10 years

    Length of time beginning after randomisation in the study that the patient survives.

    This is a way to measure how well the new treatment is working.

  5. disease specific survival (DSS)

    Time frame: 6 to 10 years

    Length of time from the beginning of the study after randomisation in a study arm that the patient survives the specific cancer.

    This is a way to measure how well the new treatment is working.

  6. Assesment of cosmetic results by the physicians and the patient using a 5 point Scoring System*

    Time frame: 6 to 10 years

    A grading scale is provided for cosmetic results (5 Point Scoring System):

    E0 Excellent aesthetic result: At first sight no visible therapy sequellae. Both breasts have a similar appearance E1 Good: minimal changes in pigmentation, a visible scar, localized teleangieectasia.

    E2 Moderate: marked sequellae with a clear deformation of the breast contour, nipple displacement, or marked skin changes, but yet "acceptable".

    E3 Bad: severe retraction or fibrosis, severe teleangiectasia. E4 Complications: skin necrosis

  7. Assesment of cosmetic results by the physicians using breast retraction assessment-Score (BRA Score)*

    Time frame: 6 to 10 years

    *The BRA Score measures breast symmetry of the treated breast in comparison to the untreated breast. The average in the general population is 1.2 cm. A higher BRA score is worse. A BRA score of 0 cm is optimal.

  8. Measurement of the quality of life (QOL): functional scale

    Time frame: 6 to 10 years

    QoL will be assessed by EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) QLQ-C30 questionnaires for overall QoL and EORTC QLQ-BR23 for breast-specific QoL. The QLQ-C30 consists of 30 questions categorized in functional and symptom-specific scales and provides a global score through two general questions concerning health and quality of life. QLQ-BR23 is a standard instrument for measuring QoL in patients with breast cancer. The questionnaire has 23 items with four possible answers each (not at all, a little, quite a bit, very much). Results are reported using functional scales (e.g. body image, sexual functioning) and symptom-related items (e.g. systemic therapy side effects, breast symptoms). It is also common practice to classify the summary scores into four distinct categories with functional scales (0-25 bad; 26-50 moderate; 51-75 good; 76-100 excellent) and symptom-related scales.

  9. Measurement of the quality of life (QOL): symptom-related scale

    Time frame: 6 to 10 years

    QoL will be assessed by EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) QLQ-C30 questionnaires for overall QoL and EORTC QLQ-BR23 for breast-specific QoL. The QLQ-C30 consists of 30 questions categorized in functional and symptom-specific scales and provides a global score through two general questions concerning health and quality of life. QLQ-BR23 is a standard instrument for measuring QoL in patients with breast cancer. The questionnaire has 23 items with four possible answers each (not at all, a little, quite a bit, very much). Results are reported using functional scales (e.g. body image, sexual functioning) and symptom-related items (e.g. systemic therapy side effects, breast symptoms). It is also common practice to classify the summary scores into four distinct categories with functional scales and symptom-related scales: (0-25 excellent; 26-50 good; 51-75 moderate, 76-100 bad)

  10. Assessment of arm lymphedema rates by the physicians using common toxicity criteria for adverse events CTCAE, version 5.0

    Time frame: 6 to 10 years

    Lymphedema: 'A disorder characterized by excessive fluid collection in tissues that causes swelling.'

    A grading scale is provided for arm lymphoedema rates higher than Grade 1 of the irradiated side (0= "not present", 1= "Trace thickening or faint discoloration", 2= "Marked discoloration; leathery skin texture; papillary formation; limiting instrumental ADL*", 3= "Severe symptoms; limiting self care ADL") using common toxicity criteria for adverse events CTCAE, version 5.0

    *ADL = activities of daily living

  11. Assessment of plexopathia higher than Grade 1 of brachial plexus on irradiated side by the physicians using common toxicity criteria for adverse events CTCAE, version 5.0

    Time frame: 6 to 10 years

    Brachial plexopathia:'"A disorder characterized by regional paresthesia of the brachial plexus, marked discomfort and muscle weakness, and limited movement in the arm or hand.'

    A grading scale is provided for plexopathia of brachial plexus on the irradiated side higher than Grade 1 (0= "not present", 1= "Aysmptomatic; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated", 2= "Moderate symptoms; limiting instrumental ADL*", 3= "Severe symptoms, limiting self care ADL") using common toxicity criteria for adverse events CTCAE, version 5.0

    *ADL = activities of daily living

  12. Assessment of treatment-related toxicity measured by the physicians using standardized common toxicity criteria for adverse events CTCAE, version 5.0.

    Time frame: 6 to 10 years

    A grading scale is provided for each side effect (0= not present, 1=asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated, 3=moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; -4=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening)

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Christiane Matuschek, MD Prof.

CONTACT

[email protected]

+495215812901

Deborah Wöstenfeld, M. A.

CONTACT

[email protected]

+495215812972

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Bielefeld University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Preoperative Radiotherapy Versus Postoperative Radiotherapy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ("NeoRad") in High-risk Breast Cancer: a Prospektiv, Randomized, International Multicenter Phase III Trial

Acronym: NeoRad

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2034
First posted
Feb 7, 2020
Registry last updated
May 7, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.