Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01502904

Neointimal Coverage After Implantation of Biolimus Eluting Stent With Biodegradable Polymer: Optical Coherence Tomographic Assessment According to the Treatment of Dyslipidemia and Hypertension and the Types of Implanted Drug-eluting Stents

There has been little research on neointimal coverage and malapposition after BES implantation using OCT in human coronary artery. Furthermore, specific drug may possibly influence the vascular healing after stent implantation. Therefore, this study will investigate 1) neointimal coverage and malapposition on OCT after BES versus SES implantation and 2) relationship of specific drug treatment and neointimal coverage or late malapposition by the prospective, randomized study.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 20 year old
  • In the case that the blood pressure at rest is greater than systolic 140mmHg or more than diastolic 90mmHg
  • When someone is taking Anti-Hypertensive medication
  • If total cholesterol is more than 200mg/dL and LDL-cholesterol is greater than 130mg/dL or if you are taking a statin
  • Significant coronary de novo lesion (> 70% by quantitative angiographic analysis)
  • Patients with stable angina or acute coronary syndrome considered for percutaneous coronary intervention.
  • Reference vessel diameter of 2.5 to 3.5 mm by operator assessment
  • Stent size of 2.5 to 3.5 mm and stent length ≤ 24 mm

Exclusion criteria

  • Contraindication to anti-platelet agents
  • Proximal leison within 15 mm from ostium
  • Creatinine level 2.0 mg/dL or end stage renal disease on dialysis
  • Pregnant women or women with potential childbearing
  • Life expectancy less than 1 year
  • Complex lesion morphologies (aorto-ostial, bifurcation with >2.0 mm side branch, unprotected Left main, thrombus, severe calcification, chronic total occlusion)
  • Vein graft lesion

Treatment and study plan

Sirolimus-eluting stent

Device

2x2 randomization by the treatment of dyslipidemia and hypertension(In patients of dyslipidemia: pitavastatin 2mg/day vs. pravastatin 20mg/day, in patients of hypertension: eporsartan 600mg/day vs. Non-ARB) and the types of the implanted DES, SES vs BES.

Biolimus-eluting stents

Device

2x2 randomization by the treatment of dyslipidemia and hypertension(In patients of dyslipidemia: pitavastatin 2mg/day vs. pravastatin 20mg/day, in patients of hypertension: eporsartan 600mg/day vs. Non-ARB) and the types of the implanted DES, SES vs BES.

pravastatin 20mg/day after DES implantation

Drug

2x2 randomization by the treatment of dyslipidemia and hypertension(In patients of dyslipidemia: pitavastatin 2mg/day vs. pravastatin 20mg/day, in patients of hypertension: eporsartan 600mg/day vs. Non-ARB) and the types of the implanted DES, SES vs BES.

pitavastatin 2mg/day after DES implantation

Drug

2x2 randomization by the treatment of dyslipidemia and hypertension(In patients of dyslipidemia: pitavastatin 2mg/day vs. pravastatin 20mg/day, in patients of hypertension: eporsartan 600mg/day vs. Non-ARB) and the types of the implanted DES, SES vs BES.

Non-ARB /day after DES implantation

Drug

2x2 randomization by the treatment of dyslipidemia and hypertension(In patients of dyslipidemia: pitavastatin 2mg/day vs. pravastatin 20mg/day, in patients of hypertension: eporsartan 600mg/day vs. Non-ARB) and the types of the implanted DES, SES vs BES.

Eposartan 600mg/day after DES implantation

Drug

2x2 randomization by the treatment of dyslipidemia and hypertension(In patients of dyslipidemia: pitavastatin 2mg/day vs. pravastatin 20mg/day, in patients of hypertension: eporsartan 600mg/day vs. Non-ARB) and the types of the implanted DES, SES vs BES.

Primary outcomes

  1. neointimal coverage

    Time frame: 6month

    • To compare the neointimal coverage on 6-month follow-up OCT according to specific drug treatment in 2 patient subgroups at 6-month after DES implantation.
    • To compare the neointimal coverage on 6-month follow-up OCT according to the randomly assigned BES or SES implantation.

Secondary outcomes

  1. stent malapposition and thrombus

    Time frame: 6month

    The secondary endpoint of this study is to compare percent of stent malapposition and thrombus at 6 months according to specific drug treatment in 2 patient subgroups or to the types of implanted DES, SES vs. BES by a 6-month follow-up OCT.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Yonsei University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Jan 2, 2012
Registry last updated
Jul 27, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.