Trastuzumab Deruxtecan
DrugT-DXd i.v.
Other names: ENHERTU
NCT Number: NCT05704829
ADAPT-HER2-IV will address question of optimal neoadjuvant therapy in patients with less advanced -HER2+ EBC.
ADAPT-HER2-IV is planned as a superiority trial to demonstrate higher pCR rates in both clinically relevant subgroups of low-intermediate risk HER2+ EBC. Moreover, it aims to demonstrate excellent survival in patients treated by T-DXd (with the use of standard chemotherapy at investigator´s decision restricted only to patients with substantial residual tumour burden after T-DXd-treatment).
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Phase 2
Klinikum Mittelbaden, Brustzentrum, Baden-Baden, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
As the ADAPT-trials have clearly shown, pCR after 12 weeks of therapy, independent of the specific de-escalated neoadjuvant regimen and independent of further use of systemic chemotherapy, is an independent predictor of excellent prognosis4,19, also in patients treated by an antibody-drug conjugate alone (T-DM1), or in those receiving pertuzumab+trastuzumab+/-weekly paclitaxel.
In contrast to the adjuvant setting, none of the neoadjuvant trials so far has focused on HER2+ patients with a low-intermediate risk profile (e.g., node-negative patients with cT1-2 tumours). The ADAPT-HER2-IV trial aims to close this evidence gap.
Since there is some uncertainty about the optimal treatment duration in intermediate- to high-risk HER2+ EBC (e.g., tumour size >3 cm), we recommend using a longer 18-week taxane-based treatment (+/- carboplatin, at investigator´s decision) due to a large body of evidence for taxane + carboplatin combinations in patients in locally advanced stages.
Antibody-drug conjugates appear to be ideal candidate drugs for a "de-escalated" treatment due to their favourable safety (reduced alopecia, polyneuropathy rates, etc.) and a high efficacy profile (e.g., comparable pCR rates after 18 weeks of T-DM1 and taxane+pertuzumab+trastuzumab in the PREDIX HER2 trial20). Similarly to the classical chemotherapy landscape, optimal duration of antibody-drug conjugate-based neoadjuvant therapy remains unclear. pCR rates of around 40% to 60% were observed after 12 and 18 weeks of T-DM1 treatment (+/-pertuzumab) in the ADAPT TP, KRISTINE and PREDIX HER2 trials in HR+/HER2+ disease21,22. Moreover, long-term survival seem to be comparable between T-DM1+pertuzumab and older chemotherapy-containing regimens (docetaxel+carboplatin+trastuzumab+pertuzumab) despite of higher local progression rates and lower pCR in one study22.
Trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd) has shown promising activity in a small cohort of metastatic patients, including both HER2+ and HER2-low BC, pre-treated with several lines of therapy. Doi et al. reported overall response rates (ORR) of 58% and a disease control rate of 100% with overall survival at 12 months at in HER2+ disease pre-treated by T-DM1+/-pertuzumab in a late line setting23. T-DXd-therapy was associated with a manageable safety profile. Recently, clearly higher efficacy of T-DXd vs. T-DM1 was shown in second line metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in the DESTINY-03 trial24. Median progression free survival was not reached in T-DM1-arm vs. 6.8 months in the T-DXd-arm. This effect was independent of hormone receptor status, prior pertuzumab treatment, visceral metastases, number of prior therapy lines and presence of brain metastases. ORR was doubled (34.2 vs. 79.7%), favouring the T-DXd arm.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Patients eligible for inclusion in this study must meet all the following criteria:
Exclusion criteria
Patients eligible for inclusion in this study must not meet any of the following criteria:
Note: Patients, if enrolled, should not receive live vaccine during the study and up to 30 days after the last dose of IMP.
T-DXd i.v.
Other names: ENHERTU
Chemotherapy+T+P
Other names: Chemotherapy+T+P
Time frame: after 18 weeks of neoadjuvant treatment
compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 18 weeks (part 1, cohort 2) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 3 years
dDFS in patients with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy (pooled experimental treatment arms of part 1, pooled cohorts 1 and 2)
Time frame: after 3 years
in patients with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy followed by CHT (pooled experimental treatment arms of part 2, cohort 3)
Time frame: after 18 weeks of neoadjuvant treatment
defined as ypT0is/ypN0, compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy (pooled experimental treatment arms of part 1, pooled cohorts 1 and 2) compared to patients of corresponding standard-of-care treatments (DOC/PAC+T+P or DOC/PAC+Carbo+T+P) (pooled standard-of-care treatment arms of part 1, pooled cohorts 1 and 2)
Time frame: after 3 years
compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 18 weeks (part 1, cohort 2) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 3 years
compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1) and patients treated with SoC for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1) 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 3 years
compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy for 12 weeks followed by 6 weeks CHT (part 2, cohort 3) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 3 years
compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy for 12 weeks followed by 12 weeks CHT (part 2, cohort 3) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 3 years
in patients with pCR after neoadjuvant treatment without further chemotherapy: It should be tested whether 3-year dDFS of each arm exceeds 92% (literature data)
Time frame: after 18 weeks treatment
defined as ypTis/ypN0 in patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 18 weeks (part 1, cohort 2) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 12 weeks treatment
defined as ypTis/ypN0 in patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1) and patients treated with SoC for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1)
Time frame: after 24 weeks treatment
defined as ypTis/ypN0 in patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy for 12 weeks followed by 12 weeks CHT (part 2, cohort 3) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 6 weeks treatment
defined as either cCR, cPR, cSD, after 6 weeks of neoadjuvant treatment compared between T-DXd treated patients and SoC treated patients
Time frame: after 12 weeks treatment
defined as either cCR, cPR, cSD, after 12 weeks of neoadjuvant treatment compared between T-DXd treated patients and SoC treated patients
Time frame: after 24 weeks treatment
defined as either cCR, cPR, cSD, after 24 weeks of neoadjuvant treatment compared between T-DXd treated patients and SoC treated patients
Time frame: at end of study
survival endpoint STEEP 2.0
Time frame: at end of study
survival endpoint STEEP 2.0
Time frame: at end of study
survival endpoint STEEP 2.0
Time frame: at end of study
survival endpoint STEEP 2.0
Time frame: at end of study
survival endpoint STEEP 2.0
Time frame: after 1 year
health-related quality of life
Time frame: after 12 weeks treatment
Number of ADR with CTCAE-grade 3 or higher in patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1) and patients treated with SoC for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1)
Time frame: after 18 weeks treatment
Number of ADR with CTCAE-grade 3 or higher in patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy for 12 weeks followed by 6 weeks CHT (part 2, cohort 3) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 24 weeks treatment
Number of ADR with CTCAE-grade 3 or higher in patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy for 12 weeks followed by 12 weeks CHT (part 2, cohort 3) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 18 weeks treatment
compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 18 weeks (part 1, cohort 2) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 12 weeks treatment
compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1 ) and patients treated with SoC for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1)
Time frame: after 18 weeks treatment
compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy for 12 weeks followed by 6 weeks CHT (part 2, cohort 3) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 24 weeks treatment
compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy for 12 weeks followed by 12 weeks CHT (part 2, cohort 3) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 12 weeks treatment
in all T-DXd based neoadjuvant treatment regimens as well as in SoC for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1)
Time frame: after 18 weeks treatment
in all T-DXd based neoadjuvant treatment regimens as well as in SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 18 weeks treatment
AESI) (interstitial lung disease, QT time prolongation, LVEF decrease, infusion related reactions) compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 18 weeks (part 1, cohort 2) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 12 weeks treatment
AESI) (interstitial lung disease, QT time prolongation, LVEF decrease, infusion related reactions) compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1 ) and patients treated with SoC for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort1 )
Time frame: after 18 weeks treatment
AESI) (interstitial lung disease, QT time prolongation, LVEF decrease, infusion related reactions) compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy for 12 weeks followed by 6 weeks CHT (part 2, cohort 3) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 24 weeks treatment
AESI) (interstitial lung disease, QT time prolongation, LVEF decrease, infusion related reactions) compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy for 12 weeks followed by 12 weeks CHT (part 2, cohort 3) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 12 weeks treatment
in all four T-DXd based neoadjuvant treatment regimens
Time frame: after 12 weeks treatment
in SoC for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1)
Time frame: after 18 weeks treatment
in SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Anja Braschoß, MD
CONTACT
Pauline Tholen
CONTACT
West German Study Group
Other
NeoAdjuvant Dynamic Marker - Adjusted Personalized Therapy Comparing Trastuzumab-deruxtecan Versus Pacli-/Docetaxel+Carboplatin+Trastuzumab+Pertuzumab in HER2+ Early Breast Cancer
Acronym: ADAPTHER2-IV
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07340398
HER2-positive Early Breast Cancer
Hangzhou, China
View Trial DetailsNCT04750122
HER2-positive Early Breast Cancer
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05113251
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Springdale, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04024462
HER2-positive Early Breast Cancer
Beijing, China
View Trial Details