Neoadjuvant ADT with TULSA in the Treatment of Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer

The prostate volume change will be determined by comparing the prostate volume measured on T2-weighted MRI at four, eight, and 12 weeks of ADT to that at baseline.

The prostate tumor volume change will be determined by comparing the prostate tumor volume measured on T2-weighted MRI at four, eight, and 12 weeks of ADT to that at baseline.

The frequency and severity of adverse events after neoadjuvant Degarelix and TULSA treatment will be determined by using the CTCAE v6.0 classification. Adverse events attributed to TULSA will also be graded using the Clavien Dindo classification for surgical complications.

The prostate tumor-capsule contact length change will be determined by comparing the prostate tumor-capsule contact length measured on T2-weighted MRI at four, eight, and 12 weeks of ADT to that at baseline.

The change in prostate vascular perfusion will be determined by comparing average blood flow values in the prostate measured on dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI at four, eight, and 12 weeks of ADT to that at baseline.

The change in prostate tumor vascular perfusion will be determined by comparing average blood flow values in the prostate tumor measured on dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI at four, eight, and 12 weeks of ADT to that at baseline.

The change in periprostatic, prostate and tumor tissue structures will be determined by comparing the radiomics features extracted from T2-weighted, T2 relaxation time mapping, and diffusion-weighted images at four, eight, and 12 weeks of ADT to that at baseline.

Thermal coverage of the target volume achieved by whole-prostate gland TULSA will be determined by comparing physician-defined target boundaries to MRI measurements of temperature distributions, thermal dose distributions, and acute treatment-induced perfusion defect immediately post-treatment.

The change in QoL and functional status outcomes will be determined by comparing the summary scores of urinary incontinence, urinary irritative/obstructive, bowel, sexual and hormonal domains of the Expanded Prostate Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26) questionnaire at 12 weeks of ADT to that at baseline. EPIC-26 contains 26 items with response options for each EPIC item forming a Likert Scale, and multi-item scale scores transformed linearly to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores representing better functional status/QoL.

The change in lower urinary tract symptoms will be determined by comparing the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 12 weeks of ADT to that at baseline. The possible scores for the IPSS questionnaire range from 0 to 35, with higher scores representing worse symptoms.

The change in erectile function will be determined by comparing the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score at 12 weeks of ADT to that at baseline. The possible scores for the IIEF-5 range from 5 to 25, with higher scores representing a better erectile function.

The change in QoL and functional status outcomes will be determined by comparing the summary scores of urinary incontinence, urinary irritative/obstructive, bowel, sexual and hormonal domains of the Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC-26) questionnaire at three, six, 12, 36 and 60 months post-TULSA to that at baseline and TULSA procedure. EPIC-26 contains 26 items with response options for each EPIC item forming a Likert Scale, and multi-item scale scores transformed linearly to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores representing better functional status/QoL.

The change in lower urinary tract symptoms will be determined by comparing the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at three, six, 12, 36 and 60 months post-TULSA to that at baseline and TULSA procedure. The possible scores for the IPSS questionnaire range from 0 to 35, with higher scores representing worse symptoms.

The change in erectile function will be determined by comparing the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score at three, six, 12, 36 and 60 months post-TULSA to that at baseline and TULSA procedure. The possible scores for the IIEF-5 range from 5 to 25, with higher scores representing a better erectile function.

The frequency and severity of adverse events after neoadjuvant Degarelix and TULSA treatment will be determined using the CTCAE v6.0 classification. Adverse events attributed to TULSA will also be graded using the Clavien Dindo classification for surgical complications.

Salvage therapy-free survival will be defined as freedom from radical salvage treatments for prostate cancer including radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy, or ablation, and reported as the proportion of subjects who have not reached those events.

Systemic therapy-free survival will be defined as freedom from additional systemic therapy including but not limited to additional ADT or chemotherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer, and reported as the proportion of subjects who have not reached those events.

Failure-free survival will be defined as freedom from salvage treatment, systemic treatment, metastases, or death from prostate cancer, and reported as the proportion of subjects who have not reached those events.

Metastasis-free, prostate cancer-specific and overall survivals will be assessed one, three, and five years after TULSA and reported as the proportion of subjects who have not reached those endpoints.

PSA at each timepoint, as well as PSA nadir, will be reported. The proportion of subjects with biochemical failure, defined as a PSA value more than 2.0 ng/ml above nadir, will be reported.

Histopathologic verification of treatment response to TULSA treatment will be confirmed at 12 months post-TULSA with targeted plus 10-12-core systematic biopsy. The proportion of subjects with a clinically-significant disease, defined as Gleason grade ≥ 3 + 4 and ISUP (International Society of Urological Pathology) grade group ≥ 2 prostate cancer, on biopsy, will be reported.

Histopathologic verification of treatment response to TULSA treatment will be confirmed at 12 months post-TULSA with targeted plus 10-12-core systematic biopsy. The number, location, grade, and percent of cancer involvement within each core will be collected. The proportion of subjects with any prostate cancer on biopsy, will be reported.

The prostate volume change will be determined by comparing the prostate volume measured on T2-weighted MRI at three, and 12 months after TULSA to that at TULSA procedure.

The change in maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) (ml/s) will be determined by comparing Qmax values at 12 weeks of ADT and three, 12, 36, and 60 months post-TULSA to that at baseline and TULSA procedure.

The change in average urinary flow rate (ml/s) will be determined by comparing average flow rate values at 12 weeks of ADT and three, 12, 36, and 60 months post-TULSA to that at baseline and TULSA procedure.

The change in post-void residual volume (PVR) (ml) will be determined by comparing PVR values at 12 weeks of ADT and three, 12, 36, and 60 months post-TULSA to that at baseline and TULSA procedure.

The change in voided volume (ml) will be determined by comparing voided volume values at 12 weeks of ADT and three, 12, 36, and 60 months post-TULSA to that at baseline and TULSA procedure.

3T prostate multiparametric MRI three and twelve months after TULSA treatment will be assessed for residual or recurrent disease according to the Prostate Imaging for Recurrence Reporting (PI-RR) system guidelines. The proportion of subjects with a suspicious lesion on MRI, defined as lesion ≥ PI-RR 3, will be reported.