This is an open-label phase Ib trial to evaluate three different schedules of preoperative ipilimumab and nivolumab. Urothelial cancer patients will be included that are diagnosed with either:
- cT3-4aN0M0 OR
- T1-4aN1-3M0
Cohort 1 (n=24):
- Day 1: Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg
- Days 22: Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg + Nivolumab 1 mg/kg
- Day 43: Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
- Day 56-84: Radical cystectomy or nefro/ureterectomy with appropriate lymph node dissection
Patients in cohort 2 (n=30) were randomized between cohort 2a and 2b
Cohort 2a (n=15):
- Day 1: Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg + Nivolumab 1 mg/kg
- Days 22: Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg + Nivolumab 1 mg/kg
- Day 43: Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
- Day 56-84: Radical cystectomy or nefro/ureterectomy with appropriate lymph node dissection
Cohort 2b (n=15):
- Day 1: Ipilimumab 1 mg/kg + Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
- Days 22: Ipilimumab 1 mg/kg + Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
- Day 43: Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
- Day 56-84: Radical cystectomy or nefro/ureterectomy with appropriate lymph node dissection
The primary endpoint for cohort 1 in this trial was safety. We determined the number of patients that had surgical resection <12 weeks from first infusion, as this is an endpoint that is clinically meaningful for this population. After surgery, patients attended study visits at day 8 and day 29. Their final study visit for physical examination and laboratory testing is at day 57 (+/- 7 days), which is scheduled to anticipate late-onset adverse events (particularly endocrine). After this final visit, patients were followed according to standard clinical guidelines. Tumor biopsies/material preservation were required at baseline and during surgery.
In cohort 2, we randomized patients between 2 arms. Here, the main secondary outcomes were:
- To compare the efficacy of pre-operative ipilimumab + nivolumab in cohort 1 (sequenced ipilimumab/nivolumab), versus cohort 2a (ipi 3 mg/kg and nivo 1 mg/kg) and cohort 2b (ipi 1 mg/kg and nivo 3 mg/kg). Efficacy was defined as the pCR rate at resection.
- Provide an estimate of ≥grade 3 immune-related toxicity in the ipi3/nivo1 and ipi1/nivo3 cohorts as opposed to the initial cohort (Cohort 1)
An important additional secondary endpoint is translational. The main testable hypothesis is that a significant percentage of nonresponse can be explained by immune-inhibitory processes. Absence of immune infiltrates, presence of significant numbers of regulatory T-cells and presence of significant numbers of myeloid-derived suppressor cells will be compared between responders and nonresponders. The efficacy will be defined as the percentage of pathological complete response (pCR) at cystectomy (secondary endpoint).