Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01685775

Needlescopic Versus Transvaginal/Transumbilical Cholecystectomy

Laparoscopic surgery has become the golden standard for the removal of the gallbladder. Recently, developments have been made so that operations can be performed through a natural orifice instead of the abdominal wall, thus minimizing the trauma of a procedure. This study compares the transvaginal/transumbilical cholecystectomy with the laparoscopic operation using 2-3mm instruments in female patients. It also examines the benefits and disadvantages related to postoperative pain, cosmetic aspects, and potential physiological alterations to the transvaginal approach that affect sexual intercourse.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Department of Abdominal, Vascular and Transplant Surgery; Cologne-Merheim Medical Center

Cologne, 51109, Germany

About this study

The amount of trauma inflicted, especially in abdominal operations, depends largely on target organ access. Great efforts have been made to minimize access trauma. The further development of laparoscopy led to the miniaturization of surgical instruments and otherwise the use of natural orifices, like the stomach, rectum or vagina. The cholecystectomy is currently performed needlescopicly with 2-3 mm trocars and in transumbilically assisted transvaginal technique. The aim of this randomized study is to compare these two techniques in female patients that are in need of an elective cholecystectomy. The patients will be randomized on a 1:1 ratio into two treatment groups. In the needlescopic group the investigators will use two 2-3 mm working trocars and one 10 mm optic trocar, also to extract the gallbladder. In the transvaginal/transumbilical group the investigators will perform the Zornig technique using a 5 mm trocar in the umbilicus and a 10 mm trocar together with a 5 mm seizing forceps through the posterior vaginal vault. The primary endpoint of this trial is to measure the intensity of pain in motion measured from the day of the operation until postoperative day 2. Four different measurements of pain will be used. Furthermore the investigators examine perioperative complications as security parameters. The trial is supported in part by the German Ministry of Research and Education (CHIR-Net grant, BMBF No. 01-GH-0605).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Gender: Female
  • Minimum Age: 18 Years
  • Maximum Age: 80 Years
  • indication for elective cholecystectomy on account of symptomatic cholecystolithiasis
  • age >=18 years and <=80 years
  • legal competence

Exclusion criteria

  • Acute cholecystitis or locally complicated disease (gallbladder empyema, choledocholithiasis, pancreatitis, etc.)
  • liver cirrhosis (Child Pugh A, B, C)
  • severe comorbidity, class IV or V as defined by the American Society for Anesthesiologists (ASA)
  • intact hymen
  • acute vaginal infection
  • lacking visibility of the uterine orifice
  • endometriosis
  • malignoma
  • obesity with a Body Mass Index (BMI) > 40 kg/m2
  • chronic abuse of analgesics or alcohol
  • neuromuscular disease that could interfere treatment or measures of pain
  • history of major abdominal surgery with a high risk of intraperitoneal adhesions (minor operations such as an appendectomy, inguinal hernia repair, minor gynaecological surgery, etc. will not be considered exclusion criteria)
  • gravidity or breastfeeding
  • allergy against analgesics
  • patients who are dependent on or employed by the trial sponsor or physicians
  • institutionalisation for legal reasons
  • participation in other clinical studies that could interfere with the present trial
  • no written informed consent signed

Treatment and study plan

Transvaginal/transumbilical

Procedure

Needlescopic with 3 trocars

Procedure

Primary outcomes

  1. Intensity of pain in motion

    Time frame: at the operation day

    Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10)

  2. Intensity of pain in motion

    Time frame: at postoperative day 1

    2 measures (in the morning and in the evening) Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10)

  3. Intensity of pain in motion

    Time frame: at postoperative day 2

    Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cosmetic aspects and overall satisfaction with the results of the surgery

    Time frame: 10 days after operation

    1 (complete satisfaction) to 5 (complete dissatisfaction) scale from patient's and surgeon's point of view

  2. Intraoperative complications

    Time frame: evaluated at the operation day

    e.g. bleeding, organ-injury, especially bile-duct-injury

  3. Duration of the operation

    Time frame: at the operation day

    (in minutes)

  4. Surgical handling for the first and second surgeon

    Time frame: evaluated at the operation day

    on a 1 to 5 scale

  5. Intensity of pain in motion

    Time frame: at postoperative day 2

    in the evening pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10)

  6. Cumulative use of analgesics

    Time frame: 10 days after the surgery

    quantity, dose and class of the used drugs

  7. Return to everyday, work related and free time activities

    Time frame: 3 months after operation

    duration of limitations.

  8. Quality of life

    Time frame: on postoperative day 10

    measured with the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) from Eypasch et al.

  9. Postoperative restrictions of sexual function

    Time frame: 3 months after surgery

    with questions 14-19 of the "female sexual function index" (FSFI-D)

  10. Morphological consequences of transvaginal access

    Time frame: at the day before the operation, and again 10 to 14 days and 6 months after their surgery

    all patients from the transvaginal/transumbilical group will be examined by a gynaecologist

  11. Cosmetic aspects and overall satisfaction with the results of the surgery

    Time frame: 3 months after operation

    1 (complete satisfaction) to 5 (complete dissatisfaction) scale from patient's and surgeon's point of view

  12. Cosmetic aspects and overall satisfaction with the results of the surgery

    Time frame: 6 months after operation

    1 (complete satisfaction) to 5 (complete dissatisfaction) scale; from patient's and surgeon's point of view

  13. Conversionrate

    Time frame: at the operation day

    Conversion from transvaginal to classical laparoscopic or open technique and from needlescopic to open technique

  14. Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

    Time frame: at 6 month

    including frequency of reoperation

  15. Intensity of pain in motion

    Time frame: at postoperative day 3

    in the morning and in the evening pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10)

  16. Intensity of pain in motion

    Time frame: at postoperative day 4

    in the morning and in the evening pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10)

  17. Intensity of pain in motion

    Time frame: at postoperative day 5

    in the morning and in the evening pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10)

  18. Intensity of pain in motion

    Time frame: at postoperative day 6

    in the morning and in the evening pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10)

  19. Intensity of pain in motion

    Time frame: at postoperative day 7

    in the morning and in the evening pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10)

  20. Intensity of pain in motion

    Time frame: at postoperative day 8

    in the morning and in the evening pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10)

  21. Intensity of pain in motion

    Time frame: at postoperative day 9

    in the morning and in the evening pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10)

  22. Intensity of pain in motion

    Time frame: at postoperative day 10

    in the morning and in the evening pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Witten/Herdecke

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Needlescopic Versus Transvaginal/Transumbilical Cholecystectomy: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Acronym: NATCH

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Sep 14, 2012
Registry last updated
Oct 16, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.