Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06552351

Needle-Free Lidocaine Injection vs Traditional Local Anesthesia in Infant Lumbar Puncture

We hypothesize that the J-Tip needle-free jet-injection system offers comparable pain control and greater provider satisfaction due to its less invasive nature compared to traditional needle infiltration of 1% lidocaine in infants undergoing lumbar punctures.

Our aim is to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of different local anesthetic techniques in the ED setting by comparing traditional lidocaine needle infiltration with J-tip.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Conditions

Age range

1 day–3 month

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

About this study

Lumbar punctures (LPs) play a key role in diagnosing meningitis in febrile infants. The use of local anesthesia is critical to the success of these procedures. Traditional anesthesia techniques, including needle injections and the application of topical anesthetic creams, have been effective in managing pain and enhancing the outcomes of LPs. Recently, the introduction of needle-free jet injection technology, such as the J-Tip system, offers a quicker and less invasive method for delivering local anesthesia.

This research compares the effectiveness of the J-Tip with that of traditional 1% lidocaine infiltration for local anesthesia during LPs in infants.

The investigators hypothesize that the J-Tip needle-free jet-injection system offers comparable pain control and greater provider satisfaction due to its less invasive nature compared to traditional needle infiltration of 1% lidocaine in infants undergoing lumbar punctures.

The aim is to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of different local anesthetic techniques in the ED setting by comparing traditional 1% lidocaine needle infiltration with administration of 1% lidocaine the J-Tip.

Secondary outcomes include the number of attempts to successfully perform the LP, perceptions of pain management effectiveness by ED providers, the need for additional lidocaine, skin condition at the LP site, and the overall success rate of the LP procedures.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:

A single-center, randomized, controlled trial will compare the efficacy of J-Tip-injected lidocaine with conventional needle-injected lidocaine in providing anesthesia for infants undergoing lumbar punctures.

PROPOSED PROCEDURE:

Infants aged 0 to 3 months presenting to the Oklahoma Children's Hospital Emergency Department between July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025, who require an LP as part of their ED evaluation will be recruited.

Randomization Strategy:

Participants who consent will be randomly divided into two groups: one receiving local anesthesia via the J-Tip syringe containing 1% lidocaine (experimental group) and the other through needle infiltration with the same concentration of lidocaine (control group). Randomization assignments will be provided in sealed envelopes and kept with the study team to be included in a study packet along with the consent forms to be reviewed at the time of enrollment.

The ED provider performing the LP will independently evaluate pain levels using the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) immediately before the LP begins and at the time of needle insertion.

A brief period of up to 5 minutes will follow the topical anesthesia application to allow infants to calm and reach a steady state, accounting for any initial discomfort or startle response.

After the LP, attending providers will complete a questionnaire detailing the number of attempts, any encountered difficulties, additional lidocaine usage, their assessment of pain control during the procedure, any skin changes at the LP site, and LP success, defined as obtaining cerebrospinal fluid.

Outcome Measures:

Primary Outcome: Pain levels, as measured by NIPS scores, immediately before the LP and at needle insertion.

The NIPS (Neonatal Infant Pain Scale) is a scoring system used to assess pain in newborns and infants up to 1 year of age. It is a behavioral scale that evaluates specific criteria to determine the level of pain the infant may be experiencing.

NIPS Scoring System:

Facial Expression (0-1 points) 0: Relaxed facial expression

1: Grimace Cry (0-2 points) 0: No cry

  • Whimper
  • Vigorous cry Breathing Patterns (0-1 points)

0: Relaxed breathing

1: Change in breathing patterns (e.g., irregular, fast, or slow breathing) Arm Movements (0-1 points) 0: Relaxed, no movement or only gentle movements

1: Flexed or extended movements (restless, jerking) Leg Movements (0-1 points) 0: Relaxed, no movement or only gentle movements

1: Flexed or extended movements (restless, jerking) State of Arousal (0-1 points) 0: Sleeping or calm

1: Fussy

Scoring Interpretation:

0-2 points: Mild or no pain 3-4 points: Moderate pain 5-7 points: Severe pain

Secondary Outcomes: Include the number of LP attempts, any difficulties encountered (open-ended), provider's perception of pain control (1-5 scale), additional lidocaine use, post-procedure skin reactions (classified as minor/moderate or severe induration, bleeding), and LP success. Additionally, it will be determined if the LP was traumatic by reviewing patient charts, defined as having a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) red blood cell (RBC) count of ≥ 1000 cells/mm³.

Provider Information: Details about the providers performing the LP, including their level of training (APP, fellow, attending, resident) and prior experience with LPs (categorized as 0-5, 6-10, 11-20, >20 attempts), will be documented.

Data will be entered into REDCap and only authorized key study personnel will have access. Identifiers will be removed, and the de-identified information may be used for future research without additional informed consent from the participant.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Infants requiring lumbar puncture for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes

  • Age 0 to 3 months
  • Parental/guardian consent obtained

Exclusion criteria

  • Infants with known allergy or hypersensitivity to lidocaine or components of the needle-free jet injection device
  • Infants with significant skin infection or dermatitis at the site of injection
  • Infants with coagulopathy or any bleeding disorder
  • Infants with any other condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make participation in the study unsafe or not in the best interest of the infant

Treatment and study plan

Needle-Free Jet Injection of 1 % lidocaine

Device

The needle-free jet injection device delivers 1% lidocaine through high-pressure fluid without the use of a needle. This method aims to reduce the pain associated with needle-based anesthesia during infant lumbar punctures.

Other names: Jet Injection Device, J-tip injection of 1 % lidocaine

traditional needle infiltration of 1% lidocaine

Other

Traditional needle infiltration involves injecting 1% lidocaine with a needle to provide local anesthesia before an infant lumbar puncture. This method is the standard practice for pain management in such procedures.

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Score

    Time frame: Immediately post-procedure (within 5 minutes after the lumbar puncture)

    The primary outcome measure will be the pain score of infants undergoing lumbar punctures, assessed using a validated pain scale appropriate for infants.

  2. Procedure Success Rate

    Time frame: During the procedure

    The success rate of the lumbar puncture procedure, defined as obtaining an adequate CSF sample on the first attempt without the need for additional anesthesia.

  3. Caregiver Satisfaction

    Time frame: Within 1 hour post-procedure

    Caregiver satisfaction with the anesthesia method used, measured using a standardized survey or questionnaire completed after the procedure.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Olena Kostyuk, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

646-643-4355

Valorie Owens, MSW

CONTACT

[email protected]

405-271-2429 ext. 44249

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Oklahoma

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Needle-Free Jet Injection Versus Traditional Lidocaine Needle Infiltration for Local Anesthesia in Infant Lumbar Puncture

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Aug 14, 2024
Registry last updated
Oct 10, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.