Dolutegravir Pill
DrugDose will be based on weight; brand names will be as supplied through the respective national programs
NCT Number: NCT06747507
This clinical trial will address the gap in published data on the effect of dolutegravir (DTG)-associated drug-resistant mutations on viral suppression among people remaining on DTG-based antiretroviral therapy. It will also address the gap in the optimal management strategy for this population.
Interested in participating?
Request Info3 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Jaramogi Oginga Odinga Teaching and Referral Hospital, Kisumu, Kenya
BACKGROUND:
The majority of people living with HIV (PLWH) on first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) in low- and middle-income countries are on dolutegravir (DTG)-containing regimens. Different countries have adopted different approaches in the management of people on DTG-based first-line ART with repeat HIV viral load (VL) of > 1,000 copies/mL after 3 months of enhanced adherence counselling. For example, Kenya recommends a drug resistance test (DRT) to guide on switch and the optimal second-line regimen; Mozambique and Tanzania recommend switch to 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and protease inhibitors (PIs) without drug resistance testing; South Africa does not recommend switch from DTG or DRT for those who are on first-line DTG-containing regimens within the first 2 years of treatment, after which management is guided by possible DRT and expert opinion. The World Health Organization has recognised the role of drug resistance testing (DRT) in a treatment failure algorithm for people living with HIV receiving DTG-based treatment to minimise unnecessary switches from this regimen. The switch to PI has disadvantages including higher cost, higher pill burden, less convenient administration (often should be taken with food), more potential drug-drug interactions, poorer tolerability and more long-term toxicities.
GOAL:
To assess the efficacy and safety of remaining on DTG compared to switching to DRV/r among people failing DTG-based ART with at least one major DTG DRM.
METHODS:
This is a phase 3b, multi-country, open-label, two-arm, active-controlled randomized clinical trial (RCT) over 12 months describing the efficacy and safety of switching from DTG to DRV/r among PLWH age ≥ 3 years who are failing DTG-based ART with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 200 copies/mL and ≥ 1 major DTG-associated DRM (and most recent prior HIV-1 RNA ≥ 1,000 copies/mL after at least 6 months on DTG-based ART). The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 200 copies/mL at month 6. The study will be conducted in 9 sites in Kenya, Mozambique, Tanzania and Lesotho targeting 392 participants including 30 children aged between 3 and 14 years old. The primary efficacy analysis will assess the difference in the proportion of participants with viral suppression at month 6 using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method. This RCT is nested within an observational cohort study describing HIV-1 viral suppression of people with HIV-1 RNA value of ≥ 1,000 copies/mL after at least six months on DTG-based ART.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Dose will be based on weight; brand names will be as supplied through the respective national programs
Dose will be based on weight
Other names: Durart
Time frame: 6 months
The comparative efficacy of switching to a DRV/r-based regimen after confirmed virologic failure and of remaining on DTG-based ART in achieving viral suppression of <200 copies/mL at 6 months from randomization among participants with ≥1 major DTG-associated DRM
Time frame: 12 months
Viral suppression to HIV-RNA of <200 copies/mL at 12 months from randomization
Time frame: 6 months
Evaluate if switching to DRV/r-based ART after virologic failure is superior to remaining on DTG-based ART in achieving viral suppression to <200 copies/mL at 6 months from randomization
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Evaluate the difference in viral suppression using HIV-RNA cut-off of <50 copies/mL at 6 and 12 months from randomization
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Evaluate the difference in viral suppression using HIV-RNA cut-off of <1,000 copies/mL at 6 and 12 months from randomization
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Viral load suppression rate by age strata: 3-9, 10-19, ≥20, 20-24, 25-34, 35-44, and ≥45 years old
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Viral load suppression based on participant's sex
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Incidence and severity of adverse events and laboratory abnormalities
Time frame: 6 months
Adherence levels, based on DBS TFV-DP levels, associated with suppression and selection of treatment-emergent DRMs
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Incidence of treatment-emergent DRMs over 12 months of follow-up
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Describe the patterns of accumulated drug resistant mutations over 12 months of follow-up
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Evaluate drug resistant mutation patterns that are associated with sustained non-suppression
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Investigate the predictors of selection of DTG-associated drug resistant mutations
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Assess viral suppression based on pre-enrolment NRTI
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Assess viral suppression based on tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) versus tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) as the study nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
The impact of regimen on change in cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) count
Time frame: 6 months
Patient satisfaction (HIVTSQs) at baseline
Time frame: Month 6
Patient satisfaction (HIVTSQc) at month 6
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of Nairobi
Other
Investigating the Optimal Management of Dolutegravir Resistance: an Open-label Randomised Controlled Trial of Maintaining Dolutegravir or Switch to Ritonavir-boosted Darunavir
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07683000
HIV-1-infection
Berkeley, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06203132
HIV-1-infection
Nova Iguaçu, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT07645287
HIV-1-infection
Ft. Pierce, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07596888
HIV-1-infection
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
View Trial Details