Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06747507

Ndovu RCT: Investing the Optimal Management of Dolutegravir Resistance

This clinical trial will address the gap in published data on the effect of dolutegravir (DTG)-associated drug-resistant mutations on viral suppression among people remaining on DTG-based antiretroviral therapy. It will also address the gap in the optimal management strategy for this population.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Conditions

Age range

3 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Jaramogi Oginga Odinga Teaching and Referral Hospital, Kisumu, Kenya

Loading trial locations.

About this study

BACKGROUND:

The majority of people living with HIV (PLWH) on first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) in low- and middle-income countries are on dolutegravir (DTG)-containing regimens. Different countries have adopted different approaches in the management of people on DTG-based first-line ART with repeat HIV viral load (VL) of > 1,000 copies/mL after 3 months of enhanced adherence counselling. For example, Kenya recommends a drug resistance test (DRT) to guide on switch and the optimal second-line regimen; Mozambique and Tanzania recommend switch to 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and protease inhibitors (PIs) without drug resistance testing; South Africa does not recommend switch from DTG or DRT for those who are on first-line DTG-containing regimens within the first 2 years of treatment, after which management is guided by possible DRT and expert opinion. The World Health Organization has recognised the role of drug resistance testing (DRT) in a treatment failure algorithm for people living with HIV receiving DTG-based treatment to minimise unnecessary switches from this regimen. The switch to PI has disadvantages including higher cost, higher pill burden, less convenient administration (often should be taken with food), more potential drug-drug interactions, poorer tolerability and more long-term toxicities.

GOAL:

To assess the efficacy and safety of remaining on DTG compared to switching to DRV/r among people failing DTG-based ART with at least one major DTG DRM.

METHODS:

This is a phase 3b, multi-country, open-label, two-arm, active-controlled randomized clinical trial (RCT) over 12 months describing the efficacy and safety of switching from DTG to DRV/r among PLWH age ≥ 3 years who are failing DTG-based ART with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 200 copies/mL and ≥ 1 major DTG-associated DRM (and most recent prior HIV-1 RNA ≥ 1,000 copies/mL after at least 6 months on DTG-based ART). The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 200 copies/mL at month 6. The study will be conducted in 9 sites in Kenya, Mozambique, Tanzania and Lesotho targeting 392 participants including 30 children aged between 3 and 14 years old. The primary efficacy analysis will assess the difference in the proportion of participants with viral suppression at month 6 using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method. This RCT is nested within an observational cohort study describing HIV-1 viral suppression of people with HIV-1 RNA value of ≥ 1,000 copies/mL after at least six months on DTG-based ART.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Enrolled in the Ndovu cohort study
  • Able and willing to understand and comply with the protocol requirements, instructions and restrictions
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent for the nested clinical trial (assent as appropriate and legal guardian consent if < 18 years)
  • Age ≥ 3 years
  • Most recent HIV-1 RNA ≥ 200 copies/mL
  • At least one major DTG-associated DRM (substitution at codon 66K, 92Q, 118R, 138K/A/T, 140S/A/C, 148H/R/K, 155H or 263K)

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Using any concomitant therapy disallowed as per the reference safety information and product labelling for the study drugs
  • WHO stage 3 or 4 opportunistic infection which would prevent randomisation to either arm (e.g. due to drug interactions or significant liver or renal injury) within 4 weeks prior to RCT screening
  • Investigator opinion that the potential participant should discontinue DTG immediately for clinical reasons
  • Investigator opinion that the potential participant should not switch to DRV/r for clinical reasons

Treatment and study plan

Dolutegravir Pill

Drug

Dose will be based on weight; brand names will be as supplied through the respective national programs

Darunavir+Ritonavir

Drug

Dose will be based on weight

Other names: Durart

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA of <200 copies/mL at 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months

    The comparative efficacy of switching to a DRV/r-based regimen after confirmed virologic failure and of remaining on DTG-based ART in achieving viral suppression of <200 copies/mL at 6 months from randomization among participants with ≥1 major DTG-associated DRM

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA of <200 copies/mL at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

    Viral suppression to HIV-RNA of <200 copies/mL at 12 months from randomization

  2. Superiority of switch to DRV/r

    Time frame: 6 months

    Evaluate if switching to DRV/r-based ART after virologic failure is superior to remaining on DTG-based ART in achieving viral suppression to <200 copies/mL at 6 months from randomization

  3. Viral suppression with cut-off of 50 copies/mL

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

    Evaluate the difference in viral suppression using HIV-RNA cut-off of <50 copies/mL at 6 and 12 months from randomization

  4. Viral suppression with cut-off of 1,000 copies/mL

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

    Evaluate the difference in viral suppression using HIV-RNA cut-off of <1,000 copies/mL at 6 and 12 months from randomization

  5. Viral suppression by age strata

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

    Viral load suppression rate by age strata: 3-9, 10-19, ≥20, 20-24, 25-34, 35-44, and ≥45 years old

  6. Viral suppression by sex at birth

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

    Viral load suppression based on participant's sex

  7. Incidence of adverse events by study arm

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

    Incidence and severity of adverse events and laboratory abnormalities

  8. Association between adherence and suppression

    Time frame: 6 months

    Adherence levels, based on DBS TFV-DP levels, associated with suppression and selection of treatment-emergent DRMs

  9. Incidence of drug resistant mutations (DRMs)

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

    Incidence of treatment-emergent DRMs over 12 months of follow-up

  10. Patterns of accumulated drug resistant mutations (DRMs)

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

    Describe the patterns of accumulated drug resistant mutations over 12 months of follow-up

  11. Drug resistant mutations (DRM) patterns associated with non-suppression

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

    Evaluate drug resistant mutation patterns that are associated with sustained non-suppression

  12. Predictors of DTG-associated drug resistant mutations (DRMs)

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

    Investigate the predictors of selection of DTG-associated drug resistant mutations

  13. Viral suppression by pre-enrolment nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

    Assess viral suppression based on pre-enrolment NRTI

  14. Viral suppression by tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus tenofovir alafenamide

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

    Assess viral suppression based on tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) versus tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) as the study nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor

  15. Change in cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) Count

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

    The impact of regimen on change in cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) count

  16. Patient satisfaction as measured using the HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire - Status version (HIVTSQs) which scores 10 variables on a 7-point likert score ranging from 0 to 6 with a higher score representing a better outcome

    Time frame: 6 months

    Patient satisfaction (HIVTSQs) at baseline

  17. Change in patient satisfaction as measured using the HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire - Change version (HIVTSQc) which scores 10 variables on a 7-point likert score ranging from -3 to +3 with a higher score representing a better outcome

    Time frame: Month 6

    Patient satisfaction (HIVTSQc) at month 6

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Joseph Nkuranga, MBChB, MSc

CONTACT

[email protected]

+254737223988

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Nairobi

Other

Collaborators

  • Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Mozambique
  • London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences
  • SolidarMed

Registry information

Official study title

Investigating the Optimal Management of Dolutegravir Resistance: an Open-label Randomised Controlled Trial of Maintaining Dolutegravir or Switch to Ritonavir-boosted Darunavir

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2027
First posted
Dec 24, 2024
Registry last updated
Sep 11, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.